Split screen/tabbed interface for multiple servers.

NEW
Assigned to

Status

--
enhancement
17 years ago
9 years ago

People

(Reporter: netdragon, Assigned: rginda)

Tracking

(Depends on: 1 bug, Blocks: 1 bug)

Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Reporter)

Description

17 years ago
It would be nice if you could have multiple servers connected at once all in the
same Chatzilla window so it wouldn't clutter up your screen.
(Reporter)

Comment 1

17 years ago
Ok.. heheh I guess I don't get off that easy.

Let me explain it a little better.

There are a bunch of tabs on the bottom of the textarea with such as this:


\ i.m.org    /\     #moz1  /\    #moz2   /\    i.u.c   /\     #s     /
 \__________/  \__________/  \__________/  \__________/  \__________/  

My idea is to organize the tabs in a double tabbed way:

\ i.m.org    /\     #moz1  /\    #moz2   /\    i.u.c   /
 \__________/  \__________/  \__________/  \__________/

and

\    i.u.c   /\     #s     /\ i.m.org    /
 \__________/  \__________/  \__________/  

So only the channels for one server are open at a time.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true

Comment 2

17 years ago
that would actually bite somewhat, with regards to coloring of the channel name
when somebody sais something...

would be better to just put some noticable separator between servers, I think;

\  i.m.o  /\  #moz1  /\  #moz2  /||\  i.u.c  /\  #foo  /
 \_______/  \_______/  \_______/ || \_______/  \______/

and make your suggestion an option, for those who'd like it.

Comment 3

17 years ago
Remove myself from QA of 33 open Chatzilla bugs and change to default QA
contact, since I have no way to verify these easily.  Still no working Mozilla
on my primary platform and it doesn't look like it will happen anytime soon. :(
QA Contact: mozilla → samuel

Comment 4

16 years ago
comment #2 makes sense.. it is the way server separation is achieved in mirc 6.x
we don't even a separator, just a little more space
(as the gaps seen in bug 114742)

Example:
[Server1][#channel1][#channel2][#channel3] [Server2][#channel1][#channel4]

Comment 5

16 years ago
I agree with #2 and #4. Also, channels should be sorted alphabetically within
their respective groups (where one group = one server...)

Comment 6

16 years ago
I don't think automatically sorting the channels is a good idea - I like mine in
a fixed order, but forcing the channels for each network apart would be nice.

Comment 7

16 years ago
problem is the tabs don´t become smaller if the tab bar is full
this way new tabs, i.e. queries, are out of sight
if u add spaces between networks plz first remove this limitation of channels
you can join
(I don´t like automatically move focus to new tabs)
Product: Core → Other Applications

Updated

14 years ago
Depends on: 76175

Updated

13 years ago
Blocks: 314617

Updated

9 years ago
QA Contact: samuel → chatzilla
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.