Closed
Bug 1184186
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Consider converting some all-js robocop tests to mochitest-chrome
Categories
(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: Testing, defect)
Firefox for Android Graveyard
Testing
Tracking
(firefox42 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 42
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox42 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: gbrown, Assigned: gbrown)
References
Details
Attachments
(22 files, 1 obsolete file)
1.06 KB,
patch
|
nalexander
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.25 KB,
patch
|
nalexander
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
8.28 KB,
patch
|
ally
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
6.75 KB,
patch
|
nalexander
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
5.74 KB,
patch
|
rnewman
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
11.89 KB,
patch
|
myk
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
5.21 KB,
patch
|
jryans
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
10.95 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
12.27 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
12.74 KB,
patch
|
Margaret
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
11.88 KB,
patch
|
nalexander
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
7.46 KB,
patch
|
nalexander
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
4.98 KB,
patch
|
Margaret
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
5.07 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
12.88 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
10.55 KB,
patch
|
Margaret
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
6.35 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
18.59 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
18.43 KB,
patch
|
nalexander
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
8.87 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
17.21 KB,
patch
|
mfinkle
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
14.68 KB,
patch
|
nalexander
:
review+
markh
:
feedback+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I think some JavascriptTest-based Robocop tests can be easily converted to mochitest-chrome. The mochitest-chrome versions should run faster (less setup/cleanup overhead) and produce more readable logs.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Some JavascriptTest-based Robocop tests have a non-trivial Java component and are NOT good candidates for this work; these include:
x testFilePicker
x testFindInPage
x testOrderedBroadcast
x testSelectionCarets
x testTrackingProtection
x testUITelemetry
That leaves these Javascript tests which may be good candidates:
testAboutLogins
testAccounts
testAndroidLog
testAppConstants
testBrowserDiscovery
testDebuggerServer
testDesktopUserAgent
testDeviceSearchEngine
testHistoryService
testHomeProvider
testJavaAddons
testJNI
testMigrateUI
testMozPay
testNetworkManager
testOfflinePage
testReaderView
testReadingListCache
testResourceSubstitutions
testRestrictedProfiles
testSessionFormData
testSharedPreferences
testSimpleDiscovery
testVideoControls
testVideoDiscovery
testWebChannel
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
I am using "gen_template.pl --type chrome" to generate a chrome test template, then importing the robocop js file into the template html. Some mechanical changes affect most tests:
- do_check_true -> ok
- do_check_eq -> is
- s/do_print/dump/
- add_task/run_next_test are not available; remove or use Task.spawn if necessary
- remove old .java/.js and update robocop.ini; add new file, update chrome.ini.
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=5d0356cac6da
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
- s/do_register_cleanup/SimpleTest.registerCleanupFunction/
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8634174 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] (pto July 22 - 27) from comment #3)
> - s/do_print/dump/
That works, in that it dumps to the logcat, but
s/do_print/info/
has the advantage that the message is also dumped to the test log, if appropriate (on failure, or if requestCompleteLog() is called and verbose logging enabled).
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=e8847db12359
I have successfully converted 21 robocop tests to mochitest-chrome; they run in under 2 minutes on mochitest-chrome -- a big time savings.
There are a few more tests that don't quite work; some of those have the same intermittent failures in robocop.
To do (after pto): clean up my translation of add_task; review remaining accesses to robocop resources and move as necessary; re-consider whether some of these would be better suited to browser-chrome; kick off some reviews!
I really like the local-run experience:
gbrown@mozpad:~/src$ ./mach mochitest mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome --log-mach-verbose
...
######
### Now running mochitest-chrome.
######
0:00.87 LOG: MainThread INFO Android sdk version '18'; will use this to filter manifests
0:01.09 LOG: MainThread INFO Checking for orphan ssltunnel processes...
0:01.14 LOG: MainThread INFO Checking for orphan xpcshell processes...
0:01.19 SUITE_START: MainThread 21
0:01.27 LOG: MainThread INFO pushing /home/gbrown/objdirs/droid/_tests/testing/mochitest/chrome to /sdcard/tests/chrome on device...
pk12util: PKCS12 IMPORT SUCCESSFUL
0:12.86 LOG: MainThread INFO MochitestServer : launching [u'/home/gbrown/objdirs/firefox/dist/bin/xpcshell', '-g', '/home/gbrown/objdirs/firefox/dist/bin', '-v', '170', '-f', '/home/gbrown/objdirs/firefox/dist/bin/components/httpd.js', '-e', "const _PROFILE_PATH = '/tmp/tmpZW8_s9.mozrunner'; const _SERVER_PORT = '8888'; const _SERVER_ADDR = '192.168.0.81'; const _TEST_PREFIX = undefined; const _DISPLAY_RESULTS = false;", '-f', '/home/gbrown/objdirs/droid/_tests/testing/mochitest/server.js']
0:12.86 LOG: MainThread INFO runtests.py | Server pid: 15949
0:12.88 LOG: MainThread INFO runtests.py | Websocket server pid: 15952
0:12.89 LOG: MainThread INFO runtests.py | SSL tunnel pid: 15973
0:16.64 LOG: MainThread INFO runtests.py | Running tests: start.
INFO | automation.py | Application pid: 3027
0:34.47 LOG: INFO SimpleTest START
0:34.55 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_about_logins.html
0:39.44 TEST_END: OK
0:39.79 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_accounts.html
0:40.26 TEST_END: OK
0:40.43 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_android_log.html
0:40.77 TEST_END: OK
0:40.92 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_app_constants.html
0:41.22 TEST_END: OK
0:41.37 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_debugger_server.html
0:43.03 TEST_END: OK
0:43.33 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_desktop_useragent.html
0:46.81 TEST_END: OK
0:47.17 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_device_search_engine.html
0:49.28 TEST_END: OK
0:50.60 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_home_provider.html
0:52.14 TEST_END: OK
0:52.31 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_java_addons.html
0:53.26 TEST_END: OK
0:53.57 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_jni.html
0:53.96 TEST_END: OK
0:54.11 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_migrate_ui.html
0:54.60 TEST_END: OK
0:54.84 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_network_manager.html
0:55.17 TEST_END: OK
0:55.35 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_offline_page.html
0:59.50 TEST_END: OK
0:59.64 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_reader_view.html
1:02.97 TEST_END: OK
1:03.20 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_resource_substitutions.html
1:03.69 TEST_END: OK
1:03.87 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_restricted_profiles.html
1:04.43 TEST_END: OK
1:04.67 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_session_form_data.html
1:23.72 TEST_END: OK
1:23.92 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_shared_preferences.html
1:25.10 TEST_END: OK
1:25.25 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_simple_discovery.html
1:25.61 TEST_END: OK
1:25.76 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_video_discovery.html
1:28.34 TEST_END: OK
1:28.56 TEST_START: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_web_channel.html
1:33.95 TEST_END: OK
INFO | automation.py | Application ran for: 0:01:35.691279
INFO | zombiecheck | Reading PID log: /tmp/tmpwcrNRipidlog
MOZ_UPLOAD_DIR not defined; tombstone check skipped
1:53.50 LOG: MainThread INFO Stopping web server
1:53.53 LOG: MainThread INFO Stopping web socket server
1:53.55 LOG: MainThread INFO Stopping ssltunnel
1:53.57 LOG: MainThread INFO WARNING | leakcheck | refcount logging is off, so leaks can't be detected!
1:53.57 LOG: MainThread INFO runtests.py | Running tests: end.
1:34.28 LOG: INFO TEST-START | Shutdown
1:34.29 LOG: INFO Passed: 174
1:34.29 LOG: INFO Failed: 0
1:34.30 LOG: INFO Todo: 0
1:34.31 LOG: INFO Slowest: 19046ms - chrome://mochitests/content/chrome/mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_session_form_data.html
1:34.31 LOG: INFO SimpleTest FINISHED
1:55.68 SUITE_END: MainThread
Summary
=======
Ran 21 tests
Expected results: 21
Unexpected results: 0
OK
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
For the record, I'm quite pleased to see tests moving out of the Robocop harness.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
A really simple start to a flood of patches: Add an initially-empty chrome.ini for mobile, at mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/chrome.ini. Note that these tests will be run on Android, skipped on all other platforms.
Attachment #8640202 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
And here's the very simplest JavascriptTest, testAppConstants, converted to mochitest-chrome.
I intend to r? the original author of each converted test. In this case, that's :rricard, but he hasn't been active in bugzilla lately.
Drive-by comments/reviews by others welcome, especially on these first few patches.
The html wrapper form is pretty standard for chrome tests and was generated by gen_template.pl, as recommended at https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Mochitest#Test_templates.
I removed the license notice since it is not included in most mochitest-chrome tests, and is not generated by gen_template.pl; I'm happy to put it back in if that's preferred.
Attachment #8640208 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Note that I've moved the check for AppConstants.NIGHTLY_BUILD into javascript. Otherwise, the robocop -> mochitest-chrome conversion is pretty straight forward.
Attachment #8640213 -
Flags: review?(ally)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8640202 -
Flags: review?(nalexander) → review+
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8640208 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testAppConstants
Review of attachment 8640208 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
lgtm. I don't know much about mochitest-chrome: is there a pattern for multiple test functions? Is the pattern to extract multiple test files?
Attachment #8640208 -
Flags: review?(nalexander) → review+
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
> I removed the license notice since it is not included in most
> mochitest-chrome tests, and is not generated by gen_template.pl; I'm happy
> to put it back in if that's preferred.
This sounds good: we should do whatever the majority of the existing tests do.
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nick Alexander :nalexander from comment #11)
> lgtm. I don't know much about mochitest-chrome: is there a pattern for
> multiple test functions? Is the pattern to extract multiple test files?
Are you thinking of something like the xpcshell add_test() and add_task()? Those appear to not be available. Many mochitests seem to keep each test file pretty simple, with a straight-forward main-line and perhaps a few helper functions.
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8640213 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testAboutLogins
Review of attachment 8640213 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I have some questions, the biggest one being about hitting the network using test links. Assuming that all checks out,r+.
::: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_about_logins.html
@@ +1,1 @@
> +<!DOCTYPE HTML>
needs a license block
@@ +76,5 @@
> +
> + SimpleTest.finish();
> + }
> +
> + if (AppConstants.NIGHTLY_BUILD) {
I'll be removing the nightly only build flags so soon that aboutlogins can ride the trains. Would I just delete this if block?
@@ +86,5 @@
> +
> + </script>
> +</head>
> +<body>
> +<a target="_blank" href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1136477">Mozilla Bug 1136477</a>
dont we usually use local links for testing? So that the test harness doesnt hit the network when we run the test suites...
Attachment #8640213 -
Flags: review?(ally) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Allison Naaktgeboren please NEEDINFO? :ally from comment #14)
> ::: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_about_logins.html
> @@ +1,1 @@
> > +<!DOCTYPE HTML>
>
> needs a license block
See Comment 12. Do you have a strong opinion?
> @@ +76,5 @@
> > +
> > + SimpleTest.finish();
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (AppConstants.NIGHTLY_BUILD) {
>
> I'll be removing the nightly only build flags so soon that aboutlogins can
> ride the trains. Would I just delete this if block?
Yes.
> @@ +86,5 @@
> > +
> > + </script>
> > +</head>
> > +<body>
> > +<a target="_blank" href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1136477">Mozilla Bug 1136477</a>
>
> dont we usually use local links for testing? So that the test harness doesnt
> hit the network when we run the test suites...
Yes, we always use local links for testing to avoid network reliance.
This link is a mochitest convention: Provide a link on the test page back to the bug that introduced the test, as a convenience to manual testers / people debugging or reading this test in future. I think it is of limited usefulness, especially on mobile, but it also does no harm: The link is not used by the test and would only be followed if someone manually clicked on the link.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
This is the first of my patches to use add_task. I said earlier that add_task() was not available, but that is changing with bug 1187701. There's still some discussion happening in that bug, but the initial patch posted in bug 1187701 is sufficient for my purposes.
Attachment #8641237 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
This is a simple conversion of testAccounts to mochitest-chrome.
One issue: The original test called Accounts.launchSetup(), I suppose just to verify that the call does not cause a crash? In the mochitest environment, I don't want to call that without cleaning up, for fear of affecting later tests. Is it OK to leave it out? Or, is there a good way to close the setup wizard?
Attachment #8641240 -
Flags: review?(rnewman)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641241 -
Flags: review?(myk)
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641243 -
Flags: review?(jryans)
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
I added some closeTab calls to clean up; otherwise, I think this is a simple robocop -> mochitest conversion.
Attachment #8641246 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Comment 21•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641237 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testResourceSubstitutions
Review of attachment 8641237 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
wfm if it works for you.
::: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_resource_substitutions.html
@@ +49,5 @@
> + // This can be any file that we know exists in the root of every APK.
> + let packageName = yield readChannel("resource://android/package-name.txt");
> + info(packageName);
> +
> + // It's difficult to fish ANDROID_PACKAGE_NAME from JavaScript, so we test the
It's now easy to do this (https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/modules/AppConstants.jsm#179) if you want to strengthen the test.
Attachment #8641237 -
Flags: review?(nalexander) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641248 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•9 years ago
|
||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641246 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641248 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Attachment #8641243 -
Flags: review?(jryans) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641799 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641801 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641802 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641803 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641804 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641805 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641806 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641807 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641808 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641809 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 34•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641810 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 35•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641814 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8641815 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•9 years ago
|
||
A big "thank you" (and "I'm sorry!") to all reviewers. I hope it goes without saying: If for any reason you don't want your robocop test converted, just say so. Nits and rubber-stamps accepted equally.
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•9 years ago
|
||
I also considered but decided not to convert:
testBrowserDiscovery
testHistoryService
testReadingListCache
testVideoControls
These can be converted, but have intermittent failures in both the robocop and chrome versions; I want to keep the mochitest-chrome job as green as possible. If the intermittent failures can be addressed, these are all good candidates for mochitest-chrome in the future.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641814 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641810 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641808 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Comment 39•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641807 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testRestrictedProfiles
Restricted Profiles have been changing, but it looks like you have the most recent test code.
Attachment #8641807 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) from comment #39)
> Restricted Profiles have been changing, but it looks like you have the most
> recent test code.
Yes, I recently updated for 8fd046b77ea3.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641804 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Comment 41•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641805 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testOfflinePage
Kinda sad I re-used video_controls.html for this, but I guess that test might be converted at some point too :)
Attachment #8641805 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
Comment 42•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641802 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testJNI
Review of attachment 8641802 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
rs.
Attachment #8641802 -
Flags: review?(nalexander) → review+
Comment 43•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641801 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testJavaAddons
Review of attachment 8641801 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
If it works for you, rubber stamp from me.
Attachment #8641801 -
Flags: review?(nalexander) → review+
Comment 44•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641809 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testSharedPreferences
Review of attachment 8641809 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
rs.
Attachment #8641809 -
Flags: review?(nalexander) → review+
Comment 45•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641241 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testAndroidLog
Review of attachment 8641241 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
rs=myk
Attachment #8641241 -
Flags: review?(myk) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 47•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641815 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testWebChannel
Review of attachment 8641815 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I see no reason that this won't work, so r+. However, I'd like to get a seasoned Desktop engineer to weigh in. markh, would it be possible to test the toolkit (browser/ and mobile/android/) WebChannel implementation in mochitest-chrome (in toolkit/), thereby reducing test duplication?
Attachment #8641815 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Attachment #8641815 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #8641815 -
Flags: feedback?(markh)
Assignee | ||
Comment 48•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) from comment #41)
> Kinda sad I re-used video_controls.html for this, but I guess that test
> might be converted at some point too :)
I'm glad you mentioned this. Since I'm not converting testVideoControls, I'd better copy video_controls.html instead of moving it (deleting the old file passes try because testVideoControls is disabled, but still...)
Comment 49•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641815 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testWebChannel
Review of attachment 8641815 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, I don't see any reason the test couldn't be mochitest-chrome on desktop too which would avoid the duplication and be a "good thing"(tm) nor a reason it couldn't just be done as part of this bug (other than the obvious of the extra effort it might take)
Attachment #8641815 -
Flags: feedback?(markh) → feedback+
Comment 50•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: leave-open
Comment 51•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8641240 [details] [diff] [review]
convert testAccounts
Review of attachment 8641240 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: mobile/android/tests/browser/chrome/test_accounts.html
@@ +26,5 @@
> + // Only one account should exist.
> + ok(!syncExists || !firefoxExists, "at least one account does not exist");
> + is(anyExists, firefoxExists || syncExists, "sync/firefox account existence consistent with any existence");
> +
> + // TODO: How can this be cleaned up?
Not easily.
Attachment #8641240 -
Flags: review?(rnewman) → review+
Comment 52•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/3fc1d9ffd079
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/2d440acf37fe
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/f425dbcf5e32
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/04a6b52d1128
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/1be9ffae5e97
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/94185637c0f3
Comment 53•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7c1ba20a3cab
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8001cf476a92
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6c082c23b9c6
Flags: in-testsuite+
Comment 54•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3fc1d9ffd079
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2d440acf37fe
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f425dbcf5e32
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/04a6b52d1128
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1be9ffae5e97
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/94185637c0f3
Assignee | ||
Comment 55•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Hammond [:markh] from comment #49)
> Yeah, I don't see any reason the test couldn't be mochitest-chrome on
> desktop too which would avoid the duplication and be a "good thing"(tm) nor
> a reason it couldn't just be done as part of this bug (other than the
> obvious of the extra effort it might take)
Thanks. Filed bug 1190964 for follow-up.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641799 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641803 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8641806 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Comment 56•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/1264230fac8c
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/f4fc37fa5a2c
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/a252287c186c
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/c87adb72050b
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/5a057086c77d
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/81ed032662fa
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/07097d4a43b6
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/61612437cafc
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/7822f3ad0aab
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/14abce1059c6
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/75953f632ffc
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/514b2733ac8f
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/dd0af7b479ae
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: leave-open
Comment 57•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1264230fac8c
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f4fc37fa5a2c
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a252287c186c
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c87adb72050b
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5a057086c77d
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/81ed032662fa
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/07097d4a43b6
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/61612437cafc
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7822f3ad0aab
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/14abce1059c6
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/75953f632ffc
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/514b2733ac8f
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dd0af7b479ae
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox42:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 42
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•