Closed Bug 1189686 Opened 10 years ago Closed 9 years ago

"Harness status: Timeout" when running "clients-matchall-client-types.https.html" test

Categories

(Testing :: web-platform-tests, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(firefox42 affected, firefox43 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla43
Tracking Status
firefox42 --- affected
firefox43 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: noemi, Assigned: nsm)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Test run such as |./mach web-platform-tests _mozilla/service-workers/service-worker/clients-matchall-client-types.https.html| Actual Result: Harness status: Timeout Found 1 tests 1 Timeout * Verify matchAll() with various client types -> timed out Traces: https://pastebin.mozilla.org/8838604
Bug 1189686 - Disable unsupported sections. r?catalinb This makes sure the test does not timeout. Due to the way the test is written, failures are reported on the console rather than immediately failing the test, which was leading to the timeouts. I have commented in Bug 1130685 to re-enable these. Update web-platform-tests expected data
Attachment #8659597 - Flags: review?(catalin.badea392)
Comment on attachment 8659597 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1189686 - Disable unsupported sections. r?catalinb https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/18981/#review16847
Attachment #8659597 - Flags: review?(catalin.badea392) → review+
Patch provided by Nikhil so assigning this to him. Please feel free to change it as needed. Thanks!
Assignee: nobody → nsm.nikhil
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla43
Hi, just checked in m-c (c69e31de9aec revision) and the test successfully runs. Thanks for fixing it!. Summary Harness status: OK Found 1 tests 1 Pass Details Result Test Name Pass Verify matchAll() with various client types
Wait. Why are we randomly disabling upstream tests due to our failures? wpt tests can be annotated as "this test fails by timing out", no? This patch was not OK, should never have landed, and I'd appreciate it if we didn't r+ any more patches like this, ever...
Flags: needinfo?(catalin.badea392)
Yes, this was a bad idea. I guess we were planning on fixing bug 1130685 sooner.
Flags: needinfo?(catalin.badea392)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: