1191924 - Release notes for Bugzilla 5.0.1

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Bugzilla :: Documentation, defect)

Description

[Frédéric Buclin]

Attachment: relnotes, v1

Comment 1

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

Comment on attachment 8644477 [details] [diff] [review]
relnotes, v1

Review of attachment 8644477 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

::: template/en/default/pages/release-notes.html.tmpl
@@ +44,5 @@
> +<h2 id="point">Updates in this 5.0.x Release</h2>
> +
> +<h3>5.0.1</h3>
> +
> +<p>This release contains the following [% terms.bug %] fixes:</p>

Do we want to phrase release notes as "Thing X didn't work" (as now) or "Thing X now works"?

I.e. do we want:

"Users whose login name is not an email address could not log in on installations which use LDAP to authenticate users."
or
"Users whose login name is not an email address can now log in on installations which use LDAP to authenticate users."
?

@@ +48,5 @@
> +<p>This release contains the following [% terms.bug %] fixes:</p>
> +
> +<ul>
> +  <li>Users whose login name is not an email address could not log in on
> +    installations using LDAP to authenticate users.

using -> which use

@@ +50,5 @@
> +<ul>
> +  <li>Users whose login name is not an email address could not log in on
> +    installations using LDAP to authenticate users.
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1179160">[% terms.Bug %] 1179160</a>)</li>
> +  <li>If a mandatory custom field is hidden, it was not possible to create

is -> was

@@ +58,5 @@
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1186700">[% terms.Bug %] 1186700</a>)</li>
> +  <li>Clicking the date picker in the "Time Summary" page did not work.
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181649">[% terms.Bug %] 1181649</a>)</li>
> +  <li>If Test::Taint or any other Perl module required to use the JSON-RPC API
> +    is not installed or is too old, the UI to tag comments was displayed anyway,

is -> was

@@ +60,5 @@
> +    (<a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1181649">[% terms.Bug %] 1181649</a>)</li>
> +  <li>If Test::Taint or any other Perl module required to use the JSON-RPC API
> +    is not installed or is too old, the UI to tag comments was displayed anyway,
> +    you could tag comments, but tags were not persistent (they were lost on page
> +    reload). Now the UI to tag comments is not displayed at all till missing

till -> until the

Comment 2

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

Comment on attachment 8644477 [details] [diff] [review]
relnotes, v1

Marking r- to get this back into Frederic's queue.

Gerv

Comment 3

[Frédéric Buclin]

Attachment: relnotes, v2

I included bug 714724 in the list, assuming it will be reviewed on time for 5.0.1. If not, I will remove it from the list on checkin.

Comment 4

[Frédéric Buclin]

To ssh://[e-mail]/bugzilla/bugzilla.git
   d9c1802..e32682d  master -> master

To ssh://[e-mail]/bugzilla/bugzilla.git
   40da871..eff343a  5.0 -> 5.0

Comment 5

[Frédéric Buclin]

(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #3)
> I included bug 714724 in the list, assuming it will be reviewed on time for
> 5.0.1. If not, I will remove it from the list on checkin.

Oops, I forgot to remove it. It's a pity it hasn't been reviewed on time for 5.0.1.

To ssh://[e-mail]/bugzilla/bugzilla.git
   d7b46a6..94b44ff  master -> master

To ssh://[e-mail]/bugzilla/bugzilla.git
   5bf48d6..55e005a  5.0 -> 5.0