1235071 - ssh: symbolpush.mozilla.org: no address associated with name"

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Thunderbird :: Build Config, defect)

Description

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

Thunderbird esr 38.5.0 build is failing 

https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/candidates/38.5.1-candidates/build1/logs/release-comm-esr38-win32_build-bm91-build1-build0.txt.gz

Executing: ['python.exe', 'c:/builds/moz2_slave/tb-rel-c-esr38-w32_bld-0000000/build/build/pymake/make.py', 'uploadsymbols']
C:/mozilla-build/msys/bin/sh.exe c:/builds/moz2_slave/tb-rel-c-esr38-w32_bld-0000000/build/mozilla/toolkit/crashreporter/tools/upload_symbols.sh thunderbird-38.5.1-WINNT-20151224050540-x86-symbols.txt 'dist/win32/en-US/thunderbird-38.5.1.crashreporter-symbols-full.zip'
Transferring symbols... dist/win32/en-US/thunderbird-38.5.1.crashreporter-symbols-full.zip
debug1: Reading configuration data /c/Users/cltbld/.ssh/config
debug1: Applying options for *mozilla.org
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
Makefile:262: recipe for target 'uploadsymbols' failed
ssh: symbolpush.mozilla.org: no address associated with name


Also https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/thunderbird/candidates/38.5.1-candidates/build1/logs/release-comm-esr38-linux_build-bm74-build1-build1.txt.gz


xref bug 1079004  - Work around unreachable symbolpush.m.o

Comment 1

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

The error in linux build is 
ssh: Could not resolve hostname symbolpush.mozilla.org: Name or service not known

Comment 2

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

from IRC  [24:19:05]gcox wsmwk: symbolpush was decom'ed a couple of months ago. 302 #releng for the mechanism to upload symbols in the new world.  Indeed.  So bug 1079004 is not applicable

we did bug 1171218. Have we regressed somewhere?

Comment 3

[Joe Sabash [:JoeS1]]

(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk, use Needinfo for questions) from comment #2)
> from IRC  [24:19:05]gcox wsmwk: symbolpush was decom'ed a couple of months
> ago. 302 #releng for the mechanism to upload symbols in the new world. 
> Indeed.  So bug 1079004 is not applicable
> 
> we did bug 1171218. Have we regressed somewhere?

Typo ? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171218#c25

Comment 4

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

(In reply to Joe Sabash [:JoeS1] from comment #3)
> (In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk, use Needinfo for questions) from comment #2)
> > from IRC  [24:19:05]gcox wsmwk: symbolpush was decom'ed a couple of months
> > ago. 302 #releng for the mechanism to upload symbols in the new world. 
> > Indeed.  So bug 1079004 is not applicable
> > 
> > we did bug 1171218. Have we regressed somewhere?
> 
> Typo ? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171218#c25

I do not understand. 
Where do you see a typo?

Comment 5

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

callek kindly emailed me ... "perhaps https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta/rev/fef892adccdf is not landed on the cset you did this beta build with (or its mc equiv)"

If this were true, why have previous betas not failed?
Unless we have a regression

(comment 4 anwered in bug 1171218 comment 27

Comment 6

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

We have concluded this error is the result of 38.5.1 being built with 
mozilla commit: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr38/rev/THUNDERBIRD_38_VERBRANCH
comm commit: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr38/rev/THUNDERBIRD_38_VERBRANCH

instead of 
mozilla commit: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-esr38/rev/THUNDERBIRD_38_VERBRANCH
comm commit: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr38/rev/<cset>