Closed Bug 1242073 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Design issues with new about:networking design

Categories

(Firefox :: Theme, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox 47
Tracking Status
firefox46 --- affected
firefox47 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: soeren.hentzschel, Assigned: ntim)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: good first bug)

Attachments

(6 files)

Attached image screenshot1.png
Images can say more than a thousand words.
Attached image screenshot2.png
Also the rows should have some top/bottom padding. Please have a look at the in content preferences, for example the list of installed search engines or the application pane. The height of the rows should be the same.
Whiteboard: good first bug
(In reply to Sören Hentzschel from comment #0) > Created attachment 8711214 [details] > Images can say more than a thousand words. The line is intentional. It's supposed to separate the stats section (above), and the diagnostics section (below), which hasn't landed yet (bug 907050)
On Mac OS X 10.6.8 Snow Leopard, no left margin and the warning image.
Assignee: nobody → ntim.bugs
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8714386 - Flags: review?(jaws)
Attachment #8714386 - Flags: review?(jaws) → review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 47
The alignment issue you can see in the second screenshot was not addressed with this patch. Shall I file a new ticket or was it intentional not to change the warning page?
(In reply to Sören Hentzschel from comment #8) > The alignment issue you can see in the second screenshot was not addressed > with this patch. Shall I file a new ticket or was it intentional not to > change the warning page? The spacing is intentional, I've reduced it in this bug so it looks less out of place.
But it's not consistent with about:config. Is there a reason for this style difference?
(In reply to Sören Hentzschel from comment #10) > But it's not consistent with about:config. Is there a reason for this style > difference? about:config's warning screen has a description, about:networking doesn't. Consider the spacing as a replacement for the description :)
Attachment #8716763 - Flags: review?(jaws)
Comment on attachment 8716763 [details] [diff] [review] followup: clean up aboutNetworking CSS Review of attachment 8716763 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Please file a new bug for the follow-up, as the patches in this bug have already landed and it's been more than 24 hours since it was merged to mozilla-central. I'd rather not have one bug that has patches that span multiple Nightly builds, as it can make looking for regressions confusing. r+ once you file a new bug for this and associate the patch with the new bug number. You can reference this comment in the new bug and carry-forward the r+.
Attachment #8716763 - Flags: review?(jaws) → review+
(In reply to Tim Nguyen [:ntim] (mostly busy until Feb. 12th) from comment #11) > (In reply to Sören Hentzschel from comment #10) > > But it's not consistent with about:config. Is there a reason for this style > > difference? > > about:config's warning screen has a description, about:networking doesn't. > Consider the spacing as a replacement for the description :) Spacing is no replacement for a description. Even it is intentional, it looks like a style bug.
(In reply to Jared Wein [:jaws] (please needinfo? me) from comment #13) > Comment on attachment 8716763 [details] [diff] [review] > followup: clean up aboutNetworking CSS > > Review of attachment 8716763 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Please file a new bug for the follow-up, as the patches in this bug have > already landed and it's been more than 24 hours since it was merged to > mozilla-central. I'd rather not have one bug that has patches that span > multiple Nightly builds, as it can make looking for regressions confusing. > > r+ once you file a new bug for this and associate the patch with the new bug > number. You can reference this comment in the new bug and carry-forward the > r+. Thanks for the review ! Moved this to bug 1246498.
Sören, removing the spacing doesn't look great either (too much negative spacing around the warning). Perhaps, we should consider adding a description to about:networking's warning instead ?
Yeah, a description would be best. Valentin, can you file a bug to add a description and include what you think it should say?
Flags: needinfo?(valentin.gosu)
I have reproduced this bug according to (2016-1-22) It's fixed on Latest Developer Edition -- Build ID (20160408004012), User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/47.0 Tested OS-- Windows8.1 32bit
QA Whiteboard: [bugday-20160406]
I filed bug 1324792 for the description text.
Flags: needinfo?(valentin.gosu)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: