Closed Bug 125581 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

PNG Transparency is messed up

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: ImageLib, defect)

x86
Windows XP
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 125629

People

(Reporter: jameslariviere, Assigned: pavlov)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: qawanted, regression)

Attachments

(5 files)

PNG Transparency is messed up. Description: Open a page with a semi-transparent png file and rendering results include: half rendering or no rendering at all for WinXP or Linux for quite some time. Steps: Goto url. Look at the sections. Actual Rendering: Some of the png's are rendered correctly in one section while partial or no rendering in other sections. I'll post a screenshot if not clear. Expected Results: The all the selected divs should have consistent semi-transparency.
Attached image Screenshot
Here is the screenshot. I suggest also to select a alternate stylesheets, either by the Mozilla's menu or click on the list on the page. You can see that even when a new stylesheet (alternate) is selected and the page is redrawn, mozilla does not render this correctly in linux or windows.
either bug 125484 or bug 125629 I think ... For me linux cvs yesterday, the right box DOES have it, the left box doesn't. selecting some text shows more of it.
Keywords: qawanted
Attached file Testcase 1
When using this test case, do not click anywhere until the background image has loaded. The testcase contains two DIVs, one after the other. They are pretty much identical, both have a 1px border (red for the first one, green for the second) and have the background-image set (using css) to the same alpha transparent png. Expected behaviour (as seen in IE): The background image is wrapped horizontally in both DIVs, but is cut off vertically because of the size of the DIV. The DIVs look identical apart from the border colour and text. Actual behaviour: The background image is shown in the first DIV and horizontal wrapping is working correctly. However, the image is not cut off vertially. If I increase the font size so that the first DIV can fit more than one of the images in vertically, then the bottom copy of the image is not cropped. Initially the second DIV does not show a background. However, if you highlight the text and then click off, the correct background is drawn under the previously highlighted area (this may be a lucky coincidence). Also worth noting, on initial page loading the PNG is correctly aligned in the first DIV. If you minimize and restore the window, then the PNG is drawn from the top of the page (but you can only see the section inside the DIV). Equally, dragging other windows over the DIVs produces the same effects as seen in bug 121230. I will post some more test cases in the morning. I think this bug is closely related to 121230 but is not a duplicate.
Attached file Testcase 2
Similar testcase here. The top div doesn't have a background, the bottom has the same, alpha transparent background as before. Spacing has been added at the bottom to enable scrolling. Drawing on initial loading is correct. When the entire window is hidden and then reshown, the background PNG is drawn from the top of the window. If you don't scroll down this will mean that you don't see the png being drawn at all - only the bits which fall inside the area of the div are drawn. After working through all this I realised this is more like bug 121230 that the problem described above. I'll try to reproduce the problem above.
OK, I figured this one out finally (sorry for the spam). In the url for this bug and in testcase 2, the background image in question is being drawn to the correct height but at the top of the window. In testcase 2, this can only be seen by reloading the page. However, on the url, the div which is meant to have the background acts like a window to that background. When it is over the area where mozilla is drawing the background, it will show the background, when it isn't the background will be hidden. Think of it like those magic pens that kids get - you write in invisible ink and then when you colour over it in the correct ink it will show up. I am marking this bug depends on 121230, because I suspect fixing that bug will fix this bug too (and the testcases also exhibt 121230). Issues NOT addressed by 121230 but addressed by this bug are: * The drawing of a background outside of the area required. (testcase 1) * The 'magic window' effect
Depends on: 121230
No longer depends on: 121230
Depends on: 121230
Even though bug 121230 was fixed you can still see that transparency is messed up -- see Screenshot (attachment 69534 [details]). In the screenshot, I've explained where its messed up. I know that IE doesn't support this but atleast it doesn't render the png's currupted like mozilla does. This is a regression.
Keywords: regression
this could be a dupe of 123511
no its not
Err sorry... I think this is actually two bugs. The URL seems to have bug 125629, but the testcases have bug 123511. Dupe this against one of them...
Marking dupe. Does anyone know the cause of this regression? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 125629 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: