Closed Bug 1259219 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Top-level mozconfig is ignored (while .mozconfig works)

Categories

(Thunderbird :: Build Config, defect)

48 Branch
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED
Thunderbird 49.0

People

(Reporter: aleth, Assigned: aleth)

References

Details

(Keywords: regression)

Attachments

(1 file)

A mozconfig in the c-c dir is ignored, while a .mozconfig is read. Most common symptom: "Cannot find project browser". Regression from the configure changes in bug 1259174.
Blocks: 1259174
Keywords: regression
No longer blocks: 1259174
(In reply to aleth [:aleth] from comment #0) > Regression from the configure changes in bug 1259174. Sorry, bug 1254987 of course.
Blocks: 1254987
Attachment #8734540 - Flags: review?(Pidgeot18)
Assignee: nobody → aleth
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 8734540 [details] [diff] [review] Support both mozconfig and .mozconfig Review of attachment 8734540 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Bump.
Attachment #8734540 - Flags: review?(Pidgeot18) → review?(clokep)
Comment on attachment 8734540 [details] [diff] [review] Support both mozconfig and .mozconfig Review of attachment 8734540 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Seems sane. I'm not sure how this worked before?
Attachment #8734540 - Flags: review?(clokep) → review+
(In reply to Patrick Cloke [:clokep] from comment #4) > Seems sane. I'm not sure how this worked before? It's fallout from the move of configure to python. There's code to find the mozconfig, but it finds the mozilla/ mozconfig. Making this fully split-build-system-aware seems like overkill given that cypress is coming (hopefully).
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 49.0
And what are the uses for the different files? I always had a .mozconfig so what feature am I missing?
(In reply to :aceman from comment #7) > And what are the uses for the different files? I always had a .mozconfig so > what feature am I missing? I don't think there is any difference. Likely historic reasons...
Windows is a bit stupid with dot files. For example you can't rename the file because Windows wants something before the dot. OS X can't show the hidden files in some folders only. You have to enable this for the whole system (or is there a possibility, aleth?). The question could also be, why should this mozconfig be a hidden file?
(In reply to Richard Marti (:Paenglab) from comment #9) > The question could also be, why should this mozconfig be a hidden file? Just a unix convention that configurable state lives in dot files. Like .thunderbird/
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: