Closed
Bug 1295852
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
elements named _moz_generated_content_before/after should not be considered generated content containers
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Core
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla51
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox51 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: heycam, Assigned: heycam)
References
Details
Attachments
(5 files)
58 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
bholley
:
review+
|
Details |
58 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
boris
:
review+
|
Details |
58 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
masayuki
:
review+
|
Details |
58 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
MatsPalmgren_bugz
:
review+
|
Details |
58 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
boris
:
review+
|
Details |
There are a few places where we compare the name atom of an element against nsGkAtoms::mozgeneratedcontentbefore/after. We really should also be checking IsInNativeAnonymousSubtree(), since regular content can use the _moz_generated_content_before/after names too.
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → cam
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8782254 [details]
Bug 1295852 - Part 2: Check for generated content containers correctly in Element.getAnimations().
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/72450/#review70050
Attachment #8782254 -
Flags: review?(boris.chiou) → review+
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8782257 [details]
Bug 1295852 - Part 5: Check for generated content containers more precisely in nsTransitionManager assertion.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/72456/#review70052
Attachment #8782257 -
Flags: review?(boris.chiou) → review+
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8782255 [details]
Bug 1295852 - Part 3: Check for generated content containers correctly when generating DOM ranges from a11y selections.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/72452/#review70066
I don't know why you request to review me this patch, though, it looks good to me.
Attachment #8782255 -
Flags: review?(masayuki) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Masayuki Nakano [:masayuki] (Mozilla Japan) from comment #10)
> I don't know why you request to review me this patch, though, it looks good
> to me.
Blame told me you wrote that code. Thanks for the review.
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8782256 [details]
Bug 1295852 - Part 4: Check for generated content containers more precisely when reflowing grid containers.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/72454/#review70264
Why move the IsPrevContinuationOf inside the MOZ_[UN]LIKELY?
If no reason other than indentation, then I prefer the current way
since it has higher fidelity about which part is [un]likely.
r=mats
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8782256 -
Flags: review?(mats) → review+
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8782253 [details]
Bug 1295852 - Part 1: Add nsINode methods for testing whether a node is a ::before/::after generated content container.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/72448/#review70318
Attachment #8782253 -
Flags: review?(bobbyholley) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mats Palmgren (:mats) from comment #12)
> Why move the IsPrevContinuationOf inside the MOZ_[UN]LIKELY?
> If no reason other than indentation, then I prefer the current way
> since it has higher fidelity about which part is [un]likely.
That's a mistake! I'll it back out of there.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8782256 [details]
Bug 1295852 - Part 4: Check for generated content containers more precisely when reflowing grid containers.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/72454/#review70520
(Turning Mats' r=me / Bugzilla r+ into a mozreview r+.)
Attachment #8782256 -
Flags: review+
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 23•9 years ago
|
||
Pushed by cmccormack@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/14d293a0db97
Part 1: Add nsINode methods for testing whether a node is a ::before/::after generated content container. r=bholley
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/acee0d460e39
Part 2: Check for generated content containers correctly in Element.getAnimations(). r=boris
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/25e6c15f9431
Part 3: Check for generated content containers correctly when generating DOM ranges from a11y selections. r=masayuki
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/a62d860735be
Part 4: Check for generated content containers more precisely when reflowing grid containers. r=me
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/b70e0aba06af
Part 5: Check for generated content containers more precisely in nsTransitionManager assertion. r=boris
Comment 24•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/14d293a0db97
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/acee0d460e39
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/25e6c15f9431
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a62d860735be
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b70e0aba06af
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox51:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla51
Comment 25•9 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8782256 [details]
Bug 1295852 - Part 4: Check for generated content containers more precisely when reflowing grid containers.
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/72454/#review70702
Attachment #8782256 -
Flags: review?(mats) → review+
Comment 26•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cameron McCormack (:heycam) from comment #15)
> (Turning Mats' r=me / Bugzilla r+ into a mozreview r+.)
Sorry about that; it appears that if you set the pref dom.storage.enabled
to false like I do, then the "Review state" combobox is absent in the new
ReviewBoard UI. (filed bug 1296662)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•