Closed Bug 1319513 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago

Disabled "Clear Downloads" text is not grayed on Linux

Categories

(Firefox :: Bookmarks & History, defect)

51 Branch
x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
Firefox 54
Tracking Status
firefox50 --- unaffected
firefox51 --- wontfix
firefox52 --- verified
firefox-esr52 --- fixed
firefox53 --- verified
firefox54 --- verified

People

(Reporter: ht990332, Assigned: dao)

References

Details

(Keywords: regression)

Attachments

(2 files)

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 Build ID: 20161122120752 Steps to reproduce: When there are now downloads in history or after download history is cleared, the "Clear Downloads" button becomes non-clickable (correct behavior). The "Clear Downloads" text however stays in black. It should be gray or something so signify 'disabled button'. I am using 51 branch (beta).
Are you running the latest Beta build? I'm not able to reproduce it with FF51 on Win 7: http://i.imgur.com/FfkRus9.jpg Could you test Nightly too: https://nightly.mozilla.org/
Flags: needinfo?(me)
OS: Unspecified → Linux
Hardware: Unspecified → x86_64
Component: Untriaged → Downloads Panel
I tested https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-central/firefox-53.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 This is the official nightly build. The issue exists there too. But I suppose it is Linux specific. I am using gtk+ 3.22.4 for the record.
Flags: needinfo?(me)
Karl, do you know if it's the known issue with Gtk?
Flags: needinfo?(karlt)
Regressed between 2016-08-06/6b65dd49d4f045c0a9753ce60bdb4b7b4aaedcf8 and 2016-08-07/d42aacfe34af25e2f5110e2ca3d24a210eabeb33. (In reply to Loic from comment #3) > Karl, do you know if it's the known issue with Gtk? No widget/gtk changes in that range, but it would be helpful to know which change triggered this.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Maybe this bug in the range: Paolo Amadini — Bug 1001324 - The Downloads Panel footer should use the same style as the application menu. r=adw Is it possible to continue the regression in the repo mozilla-inbound to confirm? mozregression --good=6b65dd49d4f045c0a9753ce60bdb4b7b4aaedcf8 --bad=d42aacfe34af25e2f5110e2ca3d24a210eabeb33 --repo=mozilla-inbound
Hi :Paolo, Can you help take a look at this bug?
Flags: needinfo?(paolo.mozmail)
(In reply to Loic from comment #5) > Maybe this bug in the range: > Paolo Amadini — Bug 1001324 - The Downloads Panel footer should use the same > style as the application menu. r=adw > > Is it possible to continue the regression in the repo mozilla-inbound to > confirm? > mozregression --good=6b65dd49d4f045c0a9753ce60bdb4b7b4aaedcf8 > --bad=d42aacfe34af25e2f5110e2ca3d24a210eabeb33 --repo=mozilla-inbound Hussam, is it possible for you to do this?
Flags: needinfo?(me)
(In reply to Milan Sreckovic [:milan] from comment #7) > (In reply to Loic from comment #5) > > Maybe this bug in the range: > > Paolo Amadini — Bug 1001324 - The Downloads Panel footer should use the same > > style as the application menu. r=adw > > > > Is it possible to continue the regression in the repo mozilla-inbound to > > confirm? > > mozregression --good=6b65dd49d4f045c0a9753ce60bdb4b7b4aaedcf8 > > --bad=d42aacfe34af25e2f5110e2ca3d24a210eabeb33 --repo=mozilla-inbound > > Hussam, is it possible for you to do this? I am looking up mozregression now. Is there a tarball I can package and install? I a scared a bit of putting files in /usr outside my package manager.
In the meantime, could the fix for bug 1282050 have caused this?
Using the mozregression tool I got to this regression window: Last good revision: 115ec609a6bf1bbc3e06f7cd2caa99e53b51e5d1 First bad revision: a159faf4c29b835d89fa6bb002c4d54c12b4ab04 Pushlog: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/pushloghtml?fromchange=115ec609a6bf1bbc3e06f7cd2caa99e53b51e5d1&tochange=a159faf4c29b835d89fa6bb002c4d54c12b4ab04 Looks like the following bug has the changes which introduced the regression: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=940872
Ryan, can you check this regression after your bugfix in bug 940872.
Blocks: 940872
Flags: needinfo?(rmkoesters)
Flags: needinfo?(paolo.mozmail)
Flags: needinfo?(me)
Summary: Disabled "Clear Downloads" text is not grayed. → Disabled "Clear Downloads" text is not grayed on Linux
Hi Florin, Per comment #11, can you help find someone in your team to check if this is still existed?
Flags: needinfo?(florin.mezei)
Component: Downloads Panel → Bookmarks & History
(In reply to Gerry Chang [:gchang] from comment #12) > Hi Florin, > Per comment #11, can you help find someone in your team to check if this is > still existed? According to comment #10 from Hani, the issue itself was caused by the fix for bug 940872. This means that the problem still shows ever since the fix for bug 940872 landed back in August. My guess is Loic is asking Ryan Koesters to check why his fix from bug 940872 caused this regression.
Flags: needinfo?(florin.mezei)
May be Dao can provide the info that was requested of Ryan in comment 11?
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Assignee: nobody → dao+bmo
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Flags: needinfo?(rmkoesters)
Comment on attachment 8833271 [details] Bug 1319513 - Gray out the "Clear Downloads" item when disabled. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/109522/#review110558 thank you
Attachment #8833271 - Flags: review?(mak77) → review+
Pushed by dgottwald@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/501dcb605fee Gray out the "Clear Downloads" item when disabled. r=mak
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 54
Please request Aurora/Beta approval on this when you get a chance.
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Comment on attachment 8833271 [details] Bug 1319513 - Gray out the "Clear Downloads" item when disabled. Approval Request Comment [Feature/Bug causing the regression]: bug 940872 [User impact if declined]: seem comment 0 [Is this code covered by automated tests?]: no [Has the fix been verified in Nightly?]: not yet [Needs manual test from QE? If yes, steps to reproduce]: no [List of other uplifts needed for the feature/fix]: / [Is the change risky?]: no [Why is the change risky/not risky?]: adds trivial CSS rule [String changes made/needed]: /
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Attachment #8833271 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8833271 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment on attachment 8833271 [details] Bug 1319513 - Gray out the "Clear Downloads" item when disabled. Minor css fix, let's uplift it to aurora and beta. This should make it into the beta 5 build later this week.
Attachment #8833271 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8833271 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #8833271 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #8833271 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
[bugverificationday-20170208] OPERATING SYSTEM : Windows 10.0 BROWSER : Firefox Nightly 54.0 The bug is verified working fine. Hence the bug is fixed.
Flagging this for verification. fahimazulfath.a, thank you for getting involved in Bug Verification Day, I'm glad to see that people care about our events and sacrifice their spare time to help us out! But I think you might've misunderstood this particular issue. The bug here, per Comment 0, is only affecting Linux. While it is helpful to test the fix on other platforms as well (to make sure it didn't introduce regressions somewhere else), the testing you conducted is not enough to justify the change of flag from fixed to verified. I'll go ahead and change it back to fixed until we've managed to corroborate additional regression testing on Linux (especially) and Mac. Meanwhile, I'd be more than happy to give you a few tips if you happen to be online on #qa and naturally, if you have the time and wish to learn more -- feel free to ping me on irc.
Flags: qe-verify+
Flags: needinfo?(fahimazulfath.a)
I have reproduced this issue using Firefox 53.0a1 (20161122030216) on Ubuntu 16.04 x64. I can confirm this issue is fixed, I verified using Firefox 52.0b5, 53.0a2, 54.0a1 on Ubuntu 16.04 x64 and Mac OS X 10.11.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: qe-verify+
Flags: needinfo?(fahimazulfath.a)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: