Closed
Bug 134503
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Double clicking on the scroll bar arrow launches Properties dialog
Categories
(Core :: DOM: UI Events & Focus Handling, defect)
Core
DOM: UI Events & Focus Handling
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla1.0
People
(Reporter: jaimejr, Assigned: Brade)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [ADT2] editorbase, [FIX ON TRUNK])
Attachments
(1 file, 4 obsolete files)
5.04 KB,
patch
|
akkzilla
:
review+
kinmoz
:
superreview+
scc
:
approval+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Build ID: 2002032803
Reproducible: Always
1. Launch N6
2. Select Edit Page from the File menu to edit a document
3. Edit your document
4. Scroll down the page you created, by clicking quickly on the down arrow
Results: The Table Properties dialogue is launched
Expected Behavior: Should be allowed to scroll down the page without the
dialogue poping up and slowing my work down.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Nominating for nsbeta1, and marking as ADT3. There is an existing workaround
(i.e. Stop clicking on the down arrow in the scroll bar, and use the slider),
but it defintely frustrates the user. This is not that severe because a savy
user could work around the issue, but it will affect heavy publishing users who
scroll using down arrow.
Keywords: nsbeta1
Whiteboard: [ADT3]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
The suggested workaround is insufficient. On Mac, that could cause the context
menu to appear (click-hold activiates).
Simon fixed some or all of this issue recently. Simon--any pointers/suggestions?
nominate for editorbase since 99% of composer users double-click and 99% of
composer users use scrollbars so we must have lots of users who "double-click"
in scrollbars...
Whiteboard: [ADT3] → [ADT3] editorbase
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.0
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Please supply a sample page. I can't reproduce this.
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
I am able to reproduce this problem on the 04-01 trunk build.
But it does not appear to bring up table properties everytime. What I am seeing
is that Composer brings up the properties of whatever object the caret is inside.
For example, if the caret is inside a link when you double click the scrollbar,
link properties will pop up. If the caret is inside a table, the table
properties will come up. etc, etc, etc
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
This is lame! The dblclick event should NOT get into the content window.
Simon: This is because the scrollbar is inside the content window, right?
Double-clicking ends up being processed by EditorDblClick(). Luckily, I can
identify it by the nodeName. Hacky fix comming.
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Summary: Double clicking on the scroll bar arrow launches Table Properties → Double clicking on the scroll bar arrow launches Properties dialog
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
I know some ways of getting a node's name are slow -- is element.nodeName one of
them? If so, we might want to cache rather than getting it twice for every
double-click.
The name of the scrollbar arrow being "html" seems lame, as does the fact that
it claims to be part of the content area. That creates another bug, which is
that the cursor remains an I-beam when mousing over the scrollbar. We should
eventually fix that as well (should I file a separate bug? Is there one already?)
But I can't think of anything else that should have a node name of "html" that
we *would* want to double-click on, so I'm willing to r=akkana this as a
temporary fix, pending an answer about the performance question. (Kin or Simon
should know.)
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Darn. The I-beam cursor over the scrollbars is the side effect of fixing
bug 128534: the I-beam is the default cursor for the entire content area.
Not having arrow over scrollbars sucks! Please file a new bug. I think we should
backout fix to 128534 if there's not another way to fix that.
Simon: is there some css attribute or class that we can use to identify the
scrollbar parts?
I can't see how getting the nodeName when you double click would be a
performance issue! If you want to scroll faster, you click and hold on arrow,
not repeatedtly click, right?
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
adt1.0.0+ (on behalf of ADT) for checkin to the 1.0 trunk.
Comment 10•23 years ago
|
||
Charlie asked me to comment in this bug about how mailnews handles this same
situation. The code we have in mailnews to handle this problem can be found at
the top of threadPane.js. We use element.localName to check for the elements we
are interested in so we we don't process double clicks from scrollbars.
Comment 11•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 77105 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1
sr=sfraser
Attachment #77105 -
Flags: superreview+
Comment 12•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 77105 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1
Withdrawing sr.
Talked to kin about this, and he nailed the real problem. The deal here is that
the editor's double-click handler is put on the <editor> element, whereas it
used to live on the <body> of the document being edited. Now that it's too
high, it gets double-clicks from the scrollbar (since these bubble up).
So the real solution is to move the double-click handler off of the <editor>
tag (which I know was a bad idea), and dynamically set it on the body of the
editor's document in the 'document done' callback, like we used to in C++.
Attachment #77105 -
Flags: superreview+ → needs-work+
Comment 14•23 years ago
|
||
Should only have adt1.0.0 nomination after review and super review are in hand
Comment 15•23 years ago
|
||
1. "onclick" and "ondblclick" attribute removed from XUL for both Composer and
Message Composer.
2. Click event handlers were added on the <body> element instead. Thus the
handler doesnt' get the dblclick message from the scrollbar.
3. A new MessageComposeDocumentStateListener was added so the double-click
monitoring works in Message Composer as well. (The existing
DocumentStateListener
for Message Composer is implemented in C++, so we couldn't use that one.)
Attachment #77105 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 16•23 years ago
|
||
Testing proceedures:
In both web and message Composers: double click on HR, Images, Links, Lists, and
inside tables (past end of text) and you see the approriate property dialog.
Double-clicking on text (except in a link) should select a word.
In Composer-only, a single click on an element icon in "Show All Tags" mode
should select the element.
Right click should bring up context menu and should not be affected by this fix.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 136290 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•23 years ago
|
||
-->brade since cmanske is on vacation
Assignee: cmanske → brade
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Keywords: mozilla1.0,
regression
OS: Windows 98 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•23 years ago
|
||
I took Charley's patch and factored the event listener code in editor.js. This
made the entire patch file smaller and should make the code more readable.
Attachment #78036 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 20•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 78349 [details] [diff] [review]
same as Charley's patch except editor.js is factored
r=akkana. Nice and clean, and works fine in composer, html and plaintext mail
compose.
I do have one request: I was confused by why we had to register a mail-specific
document state listener in the mail case in EditorSharedStartup but we aren't
registering anything for other cases there. I came to the conclusion that this
was because the composer window registers its listener in EditorStartup, but
mail compose doesn't call that routine and only calls EditorSharedStartup. Is
that true? (In that case, should EditorStartup live in ComposerCommands.js
instead of here?) Could you add a comment in EditorSharedStartup explaining
why mail is treated differently here?
I wonder, actually: do we need the editor click handler in the plaintext
editor? Maybe we should eventually put all the click handler registration in
EditorSharedStartup and not call it in the plaintext case?
Attachment #78349 -
Flags: review+
Comment 21•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 78349 [details] [diff] [review]
same as Charley's patch except editor.js is factored
Whoops, found a problem. We do need to handle plaintext composer separately --
if I run the editor on a plaintext file (so it goes into plaintext mode) and
double click, the word does get selected, but I also see two JS errors:
************************************************************
* Call to xpconnect wrapped JSObject produced this error: *
[Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80004001
(NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED) [nsIEditorShell.GetSelectedElement]" nsresult:
"0x80004001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED)" location: "JS frame ::
chrome://editor/content/editor.js :: EditorDblClick :: line 1298" data: no]
************************************************************
************************************************************
* Call to xpconnect wrapped JSObject produced this error: *
[Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80004001
(NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED) [nsIEditorShell.GetSelectedElement]" nsresult:
"0x80004001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED)" location: "JS frame ::
chrome://editor/content/editor.js :: EditorDblClick :: line 1298" data: no]
************************************************************
Plaintext mail is fine, it's only plaintext compose that's affected.
(There's also a problem involving single vs. double click, but Kathy already
fixed that.)
Attachment #78349 -
Flags: review+ → needs-work+
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•23 years ago
|
||
This patch fixes the click/dbl-click problem in previous patches as well as
addresses some plaintext editing problems.
Attachment #78349 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 23•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 78390 [details] [diff] [review]
improved patch
r=akkana. This one works everywhere I can think of to test it: composer, html
mail, plaintext mail, composer on *.txt, plaintext editor, and textareas, doing
the right thing for single and double clicks with no error messages.
Attachment #78390 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Attachment #78390 -
Flags: needs-work+
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•23 years ago
|
||
Attachment #78390 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 25•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 78932 [details] [diff] [review]
patch (don't call removal so no JS warnings)
r=akkana
This one works on linux in all the cases I tested, no JS warnings even at exit
time. Kathy and I and Simon are under the understanding that the removal will
happen automatically at the right time when the document is torn down, without
having to be specified explicitly.
Attachment #78932 -
Flags: review+
Comment 26•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 78932 [details] [diff] [review]
patch (don't call removal so no JS warnings)
sr=kin@netscape.com
Attachment #78932 -
Flags: superreview+
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Keywords: adt1.0.0
Whiteboard: [ADT3] editorbase, FIX IN HAND, need r=,sr= → [ADT2] editorbase, FIX IN HAND
Reporter | ||
Comment 27•23 years ago
|
||
Me thinks this should stay as an [ADT3], as the reporter, and knowing the ADT
criteria (i.e. This is not very severe, nor do all people click on the arrow to
scroll down the page *really quickly*. Some use keyboard nav, some mouse roller,
and others grip the slider).
Whiteboard: [ADT2] editorbase, FIX IN HAND → [ADT3] editorbase, FIX IN HAND
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 137619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Reporter | ||
Comment 29•23 years ago
|
||
Adding adt1.0.0-. We can ship Beta without this. Let's look at this again for RTM.
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•23 years ago
|
||
taking bug back; this landed on the trunk
Assignee: cmanske → brade
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•23 years ago
|
||
fix landed on trunk only
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Comment 34•23 years ago
|
||
We should take this one for RTM, and should consider for beta as this is a
regression.
Whiteboard: [ADT3 RTM] editorbase, FIX IN HAND → [ADT3 RTM] editorbase, [FIX ON TRUNK]
Comment 35•23 years ago
|
||
Erh ... so ... isn't |removeEditorClickEventListener| a dead function then?
If so, please remove it (and maybe add a comment in
|NotifyDocumentWillBeDestroyed| that we don't need to explicitely remove the
listener).
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 139220 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 37•23 years ago
|
||
I didn't realize how bad this was until it started happening to me. Changing
back to ADT2 and renominating. It looks like this has been verified on the trunk.
Comment 38•23 years ago
|
||
adding adt1.0.0+. Please check into the branch as soon as possible and add the
fixed1.0.0 keyword.
Comment 39•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 78932 [details] [diff] [review]
patch (don't call removal so no JS warnings)
a=scc for checkin to the mozilla 1.0 branch
Attachment #78932 -
Flags: approval+
Assignee | ||
Comment 42•23 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 142800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: Event Handling → User events and focus handling
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•