Closed Bug 1367290 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago

stylo: transition is slower than gecko on the CSS Creates demo

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect, P1)

x86_64
Linux
defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1367292

People

(Reporter: shinglyu, Assigned: hiro)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

Attached video bouncing_jitter.ogv
STR: * Open http://bennettfeely.com/csscreatures/ * Observe the ones with bouncy movements * Click the faces Expected: * Smooth animation * When clicked, the ball will expand for a short period of time Actual: * Stylo's animation has significantly lower frame rate the gecko * No animation when clicked Version: * commit 20ab6785cbd9da0af89da357cbef4f50c6a2afdf * opt build on linux64
Attached video click_effect.ogv
From which day is the build? I know we enabled OMTA literally two days ago (bug 1334036). I assume there's a lot of difference potentially related to that.
Yeah, exactly. But unfortunately it might be unrelated to. I see below warnings; Animation of ‘transform’ cannot be run on the compositor because it should be synchronized with animations of geometric properties that started at the same time [div]
Summary: stylo: transition is slower then gecko on the CSS Creates demo → stylo: transition is slower than gecko on the CSS Creates demo
Assignee: nobody → hikezoe
Priority: -- → P1
The transition property is: "transition: .3s cubic-bezier(.15,.60,.30,1.9)". We might be slower in case of "transition-property: all". Another possibility is that if the transition is *NOT* started by clicking the element, it might be related to bug 1328505.
OK, I think this is because of mismatched transform list animations.
Depends on: 1365851
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: