Closed
Bug 1462281
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js
Categories
(Firefox :: Tabbed Browser, enhancement, P3)
Firefox
Tabbed Browser
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 62
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox62 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: dao, Assigned: dao)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
This function isn't e10s-ready (it takes a content window in a chrome context) and appears to be used only in test_privbrowsing_perwindowpb.html (via notification_common.js) which has been dead for a few years (bug 1173337). https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=8c1dd46d41fc1142a65f1dbfba064fb88c33e4cb
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8976467 [details] Bug 1462281 - Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/244604/#review250946 Hmm, it looks like it's used right here? https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/da499aac682d0bbda5829327b60a865cbc491611/mobile/android/components/BlocklistPrompt.js#24 I'm not familiar enough with that to know at a glance if it's dead or not, but it looks like it's referenced from a few places.
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8976467 [details] Bug 1462281 - Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/244604/#review250948
Attachment #8976467 -
Flags: review?(dothayer)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Doug Thayer [:dthayer] (PTO on May 17) from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 8976467 [details] > Bug 1462281 - Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. > > https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/244604/#review250946 > > Hmm, it looks like it's used right here? > https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/ > da499aac682d0bbda5829327b60a865cbc491611/mobile/android/components/ > BlocklistPrompt.js#24 > > I'm not familiar enough with that to know at a glance if it's dead or not, > but it looks like it's referenced from a few places. That's Firefox for Android, completely separate from Firefox desktop's browser.js.
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Attachment #8976467 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8976467 [details] Bug 1462281 - Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/244604/#review250970 https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/passwordmgr/nsLoginManagerPrompter.js#1480 is in toolkit though... FWIW, I also don't see a definition for the mobile version. I bet the blocklist prompt is broken on Android because I imagine there's no tests. :-\
Attachment #8976467 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #5) > FWIW, I also don't see a definition for the mobile version. I bet the > blocklist prompt is broken on Android because I imagine there's no tests. :-\ Nick, can you check if I'm missing something, and if not file a mobile bug? It feels like maybe on mobile this is java-provided or something, but I don't see it...
Flags: needinfo?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8976467 [details] Bug 1462281 - Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. (In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #5) > Comment on attachment 8976467 [details] > Bug 1462281 - Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. > > https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/244604/#review250970 > > https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/components/passwordmgr/ > nsLoginManagerPrompter.js#1480 is in toolkit though... Still not needed in desktop Firefox because we implement PopupNotifications. _getNotifyBox is only the legacy fallback for _getPopupNote.
Attachment #8976467 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8976467 [details] Bug 1462281 - Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/244604/#review250972 Please leave a note on the disabled test bug to indicate this bit will need to be fixed.
Attachment #8976467 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Pushed by dgottwald@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/df66a68e78da Remove obsolete getNotificationBox function form browser.js. r=Gijs
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #6) > (In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #5) > > FWIW, I also don't see a definition for the mobile version. I bet the > > blocklist prompt is broken on Android because I imagine there's no tests. :-\ > > Nick, can you check if I'm missing something, and if not file a mobile bug? > It feels like maybe on mobile this is java-provided or something, but I > don't see it... Yeah, this looks busted: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1462796. I wonder what getNotificationBox in devtools hopes to achieve...
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/df66a68e78da
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
status-firefox62:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 62
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nick Alexander :nalexander from comment #10) > (In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #6) > > (In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #5) > > > FWIW, I also don't see a definition for the mobile version. I bet the > > > blocklist prompt is broken on Android because I imagine there's no tests. :-\ > > > > Nick, can you check if I'm missing something, and if not file a mobile bug? > > It feels like maybe on mobile this is java-provided or something, but I > > don't see it... > > Yeah, this looks busted: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1462796. I wonder what > getNotificationBox in devtools hopes to achieve... Looks like this is obsolete and will be addressed by the Add-ons/Web Extensions team; clearing my NI here.
Flags: needinfo?(nalexander)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•