Move Raptor jobs to tier 1, and turn off duplicate talos jobs
Categories
(Testing :: Raptor, defect)
Tracking
(firefox65 fixed, firefox66 fixed, firefox67 fixed)
People
(Reporter: rwood, Assigned: jesup)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
5.16 KB,
patch
|
jmaher
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.03 KB,
patch
|
lizzard
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Reporter | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
:jmaher, do we need to have Raptor support for stylo threads also (like the talos tp6-stylo-threads job)? Raptor doesn't have support for --stylo-threads. If we need that, I'll file a new bug for that. I'm assuming we should leave the talos tp6-stylo-threads job running for now, and then turn it off after we add that to Raptor.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
I am not sure about --stylo-threads, it appears to be added in bug 1383146, :cpeterson, do we still have a need to test talos with different stylo threads?
Comment 4•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Joel Maher ( :jmaher ) (UTC-4) from comment #3) > I am not sure about --stylo-threads, it appears to be added in bug 1383146, > :cpeterson, do we still have a need to test talos with different stylo > threads? Cameron, do you still care about running Talos tp6 page load tests, AWSY, and web-platform-tests for both STYLO_THREADS=1 and STYLO_THREADS=4 (from bug 1383146)? https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?case=true&q=stylo-threads https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/search?case=true&q=STYLO_THREADS
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•6 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=56849ddc5ab9b3c2134902fb4bf09fb7dbbab2fe
Pushed by rwood@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/9f9a9234959f Move Raptor jobs to tier 1, and turn off duplicate talos jobs; r=jmaher
Comment 7•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9f9a9234959f
Comment 8•6 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Chris Peterson [:cpeterson] from comment #4) > Cameron, do you still care about running Talos tp6 page load tests, AWSY, > and web-platform-tests for both STYLO_THREADS=1 and STYLO_THREADS=4 (from > bug 1383146)? It would be good if we could keep running Talos and AWSY in both configurations, since they have some different characteristics and we don't want to regress either. The chance of there being a correctness bug that would creep in with STYLO_THREADS=1 but not STYLO_THREADS=4 is less likely, so I wouldn't be as concerned about losing those. (I wonder anyway if any of our platforms will naturally choose to use one styling thread?)
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
:heycam, talos tp6 stylo-threads=1 doesn't compare against anything else, we only run tp6 on raptor which is different pages, tools, and measurements. I only see value in correctness (i.e. not crashing) since talos failures will be lumped together into generic failures. Should we move this to raptor or a unittest? What difference do we get between AWSY and talos ss tp6 ?
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
:davehunt, in the previous comment (comment 9), I outline what we run and why I think we shouldn't be running tp6 on talos. Is this something we can move to raptor? I would like to simplify the sheriffs use case as much as possible and also allow for reducing the one reason for running mitmproxy in talos and the related intermittents.
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
The sheriffs are concerned about going to merge with a near-permaorange here, even if it's going to be disabled RSN. This should turn off just tp6_google. (A better patch might be to disable tp6 on talos entirely, but I think that's not needed in order to get green for merge - try running at https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=8b309ddb8d3818930911483f81eeb886571673b3). Will take any r+
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Comment 14•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9039465 [details] [diff] [review] disable talos tp6_google Review of attachment 9039465 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I am fine with the talos.json changes; the timeoutmanager.cpp changes seem not so scary, but not in my wheelhouse.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•5 years ago
|
||
Sorry, only the talos.json ones - I was tired and sick when I threw that up for review at 11pm
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 16•5 years ago
|
||
Pushed by rjesup@wgate.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/8df4bb7de73f disable talos tp6_google r=jmaher
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•5 years ago
|
||
Beta version of the patch - and I didn't notice this bug was marked as resolved-fixed; I'll reopen since we hadn't fully disabled tp6 in talos with the initial landing. (If I'd notices, I'd have opened a second bug - sorry, it was late and I was sick).
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9039566 [details] [diff] [review]
beta.patch
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
Feature/Bug causing the regression
User impact if declined
no user impact; near-permaorange on
Is this code covered by automated tests?
Yes
Has the fix been verified in Nightly?
Yes
Needs manual test from QE?
No
If yes, steps to reproduce
List of other uplifts needed
None
Risk to taking this patch
Low
Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)
Just turning off a test
String changes made/needed
none
Comment 19•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9039566 [details] [diff] [review] beta.patch Disable some tests. OK for beta uplift.
Comment 20•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 22•5 years ago
|
||
uplift |
Randell had landed this on Monday: https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/01fb0fbf92d4c35b35bddd7708a92313e074cd10
Comment hidden (Intermittent Failures Robot) |
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 24•5 years ago
|
||
We're tracking removing talos stylo sequential threads tp6 in bug 1508694.
Description
•