585 bytes, text/html
3.73 KB, image/gif
17.05 KB, image/gif
11.08 KB, image/png
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020614 Netscape/7.0b1 BuildID: 20020614 <u>กขอุอูอฺญฐฎฏฤฦกข</u> in Thai text, we need the line to skip all below-level part & tail of char (also below-level char, like below vowel) please see the attached testcase. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: open attached testcase Actual Results: underline went across Thai base-level characters, also base-level part/tail of Thai characters. Expected Results: underline skip Thai base-level characters, also base-level part/tail of Thai characters. ---- also, in case of English text, e.g abcgyqjabc when it went underlined, should the line skip tails of "gyqj" ?
FYI, Thai character has 4 levels of displaying. from highest to lowest level: top above (same level as accent mark of western) base (same level as general western character) below list of below-level Thai character: U+0E38 U+0E39 U+0E3A list of Thai character with "below-level part": U+0E0D U+0E10 list of Thai character with "below-level tail": U+0E0E U+0E0F U+0E24 U+0E26 U+0E45 U+0E46
some character like U+0E3A, will be unseen if the underline striked over it.
This is, IMO, another deficiency of the underline definition in the CSS spec (which we're moving towards in bug 1777), that we're not allowed to do this. (Or are we?)
propose new attribute to CSS ? to let web developer able to choose style for underline ? 2 style options - strike out - skip over seems this too hard -_-' just my 2 satangs :|
(changed the summary to be more general) example of Latin characters that has some part below the base line: U+0067 g U+006A j U+0070 p U+0071 q U+0079 y U+00C7 Latin Capital Letter C with Cedilla U+00FD Latin Small Letter Y with Acute U+00FE Latin Small Letter Thorn U+0104 Latin Capital Letter A with Ogonek U+014B Latin Small Letter Eng
comment #5 .. may be it's not clear. possible options 1) not skip 2) skip only whitespace 3) skip only below-base-line part-of-character 4) skip whitespace and below-base-line part-of-character
I think we are allowed to do this per the spec, actually. It counts the same as changing the thickness to allow for subscripts, which the spec explicitly allows. We should give feedback to the CSSWG that we want 'text-underline-mode' to have a value which controls whether or not we skip descenders.
actually, i've sent an e-mail to email@example.com yesterday, not sure if it a good place to send to. (i'm not subscribed to the list yet, so the msg may delayed) i can fwd the e-mail to you on monday morning, when i'm at the office and can access the sentbox :) please comment on it, thanks.
list archive http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/
Created attachment 92925 [details] Hindi underlining example Shows input and output sequences and expected underlining. Pl ignore the boxes. prabhat
Comment about attachment 92925 [details] Indian language scripts (particularly South Indian languages) will have the same issue. In addition could someone point me to the logic of underlining text? My concern is that CTL (Complex Text Layout) scripts such as Thai, Hebrew, Arabic require underlining to happen after the characters are shaped to account for shaping as well as below-base characters. Pl see attached gif for hindi. prabhat
Created attachment 94217 [details] example of different underlining styles, using Thai/Latin text black: grapheme cluster WITH some part below the base line level. grey: grapheme cluster without.
from attachment 94217 [details] i think "skip-whole-cell" is the easiest to implement. (note: i use the word (display) cell/grapheme cluster interchangably here .. sorry)
So if I have: <span style="text-decoration: underline"> <span style="vertical-align: -0.5em">text</span> more text </span> what should happen? Should the same apply for overline and ascenders? (Think bigger font in the middle of an overlined inline.)
Similar issue in OpenOffice.org Underlining should optionally skip descenders and characters below baseline http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=43776
Isn't this a dupe of bug 64874?
*** Bug 64874 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 312441 [details] Message: Jiggy says “สูงสุดคืนสู่สามัญ” The problem still affects with current nightly build.
BugAThon Bangkok: We all agreed that this bug is not a blocking bug for Thai support. (i.e. just optional, good to have, but not necessary)
This seems more important with the new support for colored underlines.
I have a very rough idea of how to do this. If someone's interested in trying to fix it I can give some guidance. It would be good to prototype out an algorithm for breaking the underline first.
I would like to work on this bug, i am good at c++. Please guide me through this
Aish, you should probably look over the CSS3 Text Decoration spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/css-text-decor-3/ and maybe ping jrmuizel directly -- he seems to have not noticed your comment. :)
It looks like this property has been removed from specs long ago. I cannot find it in any current draft. So close it.
Bug 812990 supersedes this.