Closed
Bug 1689247
Opened 4 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Read only input fields don't have a transparent background anymore
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Theme, defect)
Tracking
(thunderbird_esr78 unaffected, thunderbird86+ affected)
RESOLVED
FIXED
87 Branch
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| thunderbird_esr78 | --- | unaffected |
| thunderbird86 | + | affected |
People
(Reporter: aleca, Assigned: Paenglab)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(2 files)
|
14.63 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
888 bytes,
patch
|
mkmelin
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Input fields with the readonly attribute used to have a transparent background.
Something from m-c must have changed as all these fields now come with the forced background and focus ring.
They also don't expand anymore to 100% in those sections where we styled them that way. Specifically the whole OpenPGP section in the Account Settings looks a bit broken.
- Key info in the e2ee section.
- Key Properties subdialog.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
My bad. I removed the rule in bug 1684423 thinking it was only used in the SMTP area.
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
Regressed by: 1684423
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → richard.marti
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #9199724 -
Flags: review?(alessandro)
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9199724 [details] [diff] [review]
1689247-readonly-fields.patch
Review of attachment 9199724 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'll steal this and get it into nightly. r=mkmelin
Attachment #9199724 -
Flags: review?(alessandro) → review+
Updated•4 years ago
|
status-thunderbird86:
--- → affected
tracking-thunderbird86:
--- → +
Keywords: checkin-needed-tb
Target Milestone: --- → 87 Branch
Pushed by mkmelin@iki.fi:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/ea8fc7b7757e
Re-add the rules for the read only text fields. r=mkmelin
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•