Slow performance on https://compat-table.github.io/compat-table/es6/ compared to Chrome
Categories
(Core :: Web Painting, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: bas.schouten, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug, )
Details
Attachments
(1 obsolete file)
Hovering on the page is significantly slower in Firefox when compared to Chrome.
See the profile: https://share.firefox.dev/3YsDPnN
Emilio noted some of this is caused by querySelectorAll. There is also an unexplained reflow here. And DisplayList building also shows up.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
FWIW, the difference becomes even more stark if you first expand the whole table by clicking on the arrow on the "Feature NAme" cell on the table.
Example profile: https://share.firefox.dev/3HFdZWN
Chrome is visually smoother.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9316431 [details]
Bug 1815422 - Deal with table cells in the abspos cb change optimization code-path. r=dholbert,#layout
Revision D169127 was moved to bug 1815552. Setting attachment 9316431 [details] to obsolete.
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
Bug 1815552 makes it quite noticeably faster, removing all the reflow. The rest is display list building.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
The severity field is not set for this bug.
:jwatt, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
(After bug 1815552 this should be much better as per comment 4)
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mayank Bansal from comment #1)
FWIW, the difference becomes even more stark if you first expand the whole table by clicking on the arrow on the "Feature NAme" cell on the table.
Example profile: https://share.firefox.dev/3HFdZWNChrome is visually smoother.
Profile with patches from bug 1815552 : https://share.firefox.dev/3EOktCj
Visually, we are comparable (and maybe slightly faster) than Chrome
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
The severity field is not set for this bug.
:tnikkel, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Comment 9•2 years ago
|
||
If we are on par or slightly better than Chrome -> S3.
Updated•9 months ago
|
Description
•