GetIdleTime GDBus error
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
People
(Reporter: mike.cloaked, Unassigned)
Details
Recent Thunderbird beta 120.0b5 through to 120.0b7 has given the following warning in the console when starting using the profile manager (and presume the warning is present what starting normally without the profile manager also).
In the console the following lines appear:
[Parent 2658, Main Thread] WARNING: Failed to call GetIdletime(): GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.Mutter.IdleMonitor was not provided by any .service files
: 'glib warning', file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/toolkit/xre/nsSigHandlers.cpp:187
** (thunderbird-beta:2658): WARNING **: 09:41:15.151: Failed to call GetIdletime(): GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.Mutter.IdleMonitor was not provided by any .service files
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•1 year ago
•
|
||
This is possibly related to the following Firefox bug 1861615
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•1 year ago
•
|
||
This warning remains for 121.0b1 ( BuildID is 20231120205714 ) where the console shows:
[Parent 2032, Main Thread] WARNING: Failed to call GetIdletime(): GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.Mutter.IdleMonitor was not provided by any .service files
: 'glib warning', file /builds/worker/checkouts/gecko/toolkit/xre/nsSigHandlers.cpp:187
** (thunderbird-beta:2032): WARNING **: 18:58:13.164: Failed to call GetIdletime(): GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.gnome.Mutter.IdleMonitor was not provided by any .service files
This appears to be related to the gnome desktop though in my case I am not using gnome but the plasma desktop - perhaps this helps?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•1 year ago
•
|
||
Perhaps the fix in bug 1865723 will feed through to Thunderbird beta 121 for builds in the near future?
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
(In reply to Mike Cloaked from comment #3)
Perhaps the fix in bug 1865723 will feed through to Thunderbird beta 121 for builds in the near future?
Not unless someone asks in bug 1865723.
Comment 5•1 year ago
•
|
||
That (uplifting to 121) seems probably doable. In any case, I think this is the same issue as discussed in bug 1865723, so let's dupe there (even though this one was filed first) since a fix ended up being landed over there.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
Excellent - the bug is no longer present in Thunderbird beta 121.0b3 as of today (that build just completed a short time ago). Thank you.
Description
•