Closed
Bug 210622
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Release notes not detailed enough for using Sun Java Plugin on Red Hat 7.2
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Java: OJI, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: jim_nance, Assigned: yuanyi21)
References
()
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
I just installed mozilla 1.4 rc3 on a Red Hat 7.2 system. I also installed the
Sun 1.4.2 JRE refered to by the link in the release notes, and made the plugin
symlink as described in the release notes. When I start mozilla with the plugin
link present, I get a message which indicates that the java plugin needs
libgcc_s.so which is not present on a Red Hat 7.2 system. I solved this problem
by copying the libgcc_s.so from a Red Hat 9 system into my mozilla installation
directory.
I believe the release notes should mention this.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
First I will check libgcc_s.so is used by java plugin or mozilla
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
yes, the libgcc_s.so is used by java plugin,
Xiaobin, should JPI release engineer build a libjavaplugin_oji.so that
independent to libgcc_s.so? (static link?)
As I mentioned in another bug report, the intention of build GCC 3.2 version of
Java Plugin is to support modern version of Linux such SuSE 8.1 or later, RedHat
8.0 or later. We don't have a plan to build a plugin statically link to
libgcc_s.so.1. Unless there is a need for this, we won't do it.
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 208421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
If you are going to deprecate bug 208421 as being a duplicate of this
(higher-number) bug, please create a more generic tracking bug. In particular,
the other bug affected people using JDK1.4.1xx whereas this one describes a beta
version of JDK 1.4.2. Likewise, the previous bug affected all Linux (and I
suspect BSD) distributions, whereas this one limits itself to an outdated
version of RedHat...
Thanks,
Daniel
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
I'm workin' on it. http://mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.4/README.html#new-issues
and http://mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.4/known-problems.html#java (updates may
not show up for another hour or so.)
I think mozilla.org will also be making available an egcs 1.1.2 build for those
on older systems. Which plugin should those people use?
They should use the one in the ns610 directory:
tricia> ls /usr/java/j2re1.4.2/plugin/i386/
ns4/ ns610/ ns610-gcc32/
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 211028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Note that you can fix older Red Hat versions by installing the GCC supplements
for Red Hat 7.3 (GCC 3.1 Compiler Suite for Red Hat Linux 7.3). Most people
don't have acces to a Red Hat 8 or 9 to copy their version of libgcc_s.so.
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 210583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
do you think
http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.4/README.html#new-issues
is enough?
Thanks
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
This seems like a reasonable solution.
Putting a note on
http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.4/installation-extras.html#extras_java
would also help.
Thanks for clearing up the confusion.
Later,
Daniel
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
Asa,
in http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.4/installation-extras.html#extras_java
Would you please to add some notes following:
"In Linux Put a symlink to
/usr/java/jre<version>/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so in your plugins/
directory. "
For example:
"If you are using mozilla that built by gcc 3.x, Put a symlink to
/usr/java/jre<version>/plugin/i386/ns610-gcc32/libjavaplugin_oji.so in your
plugins/ directory. (version >= 1.4.2"
Thanks!
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
FYI, when I used the version of Mozilla built for gcc-2.96-112.7.2 and Red Hat
7.2 (fully patched):
mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-egcs112-1.4.tar.gz
And downloaded and installed j2re-1.4.2-fcs (no longer beta)
And pointed:
/usr/local/mozilla/plugins/libjavaplugin_oji.so ->
/usr/java/j2re1.4.2/plugin/i386/ns610/libjavaplugin_oji.so
Mozilla 1.4 now works for me.
Thanks for the build and for the instructions.
You all may not be the right people to mention this too, but its worth saying...
it took some doing to get this to work! Red Hat 7.2 is not that old. I hope the
next build doesn't require a CS degree to get working on RH 7.2.
On the bright side, Java no longer crashes my Mozilla browser when I leave a
java page and go to a regular HTML page. Great!
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
I am also having problems.
I am running Mozilla 1.4 on Redhat 8.0. I built Mozilla from the Source RPMs
and it seems to be working fine.
Except for java.
I downloaded the JRE 1.4.2 from Sun and installed. I made the symlink, as
directed, to the plug-in which then shows up in the Help-AboutPlugins. However,
when I try to browse to a java-enabled page, I get
"This page gets information of a type (applicaton/x-java-vm) that can only be
viewed with the appropriate plug-in."
Yet if I view my plug-ins with Help-About PlugIns that is the first mime-type
listed as being installed.
So what gives? There's no issue of permissions.
One other thing, my symlink is to the ns610-gcc32 version of the plugin as
indicated in the Mozilla documentation.
I had also tried the plain ns610 version as is indicated in some other
documentation. When the symlink pointed to that, Mozilla would try to load but
die before coming onscreen.
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
For last comment:
After the symlink is made, make sure you shut down the browser completely.
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the suggestion but it doesn't help. Although the plugin is shown as
loaded, no java-enabled pages work and the Java Console refuses to come up. Are
there any other ideas of what I can do? Why does one component see the plugin
and other components don't? Is there a log someplace where I might find an
error message?
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
set JAVA_PLUGIN_TRACE to 1 and run Mozilla in debug mode to see if any output
gives out.
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 214659 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Reporter | ||
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
This is not really relivant anymore. I am going to close this.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•