not usre if 1.5 bookmarks ever makes it to 1.6 branch. Anyway, these URLs need to be updated: Support & Release Notes Set to blocker since we should have this in 1.6 release
1.6 is already released, so I assume this bug is INVALID. pi
gerv, it looks like change in bug 218326 is never ported to Mozilla 1.6 final. Can we keep a separate bookmark.html and have the installer script or whatever choose the right file?
Grr. That's annoying. We need to check the bookmark changes into the trunk. And perhaps the 1.6 branch too, if we are going to do another release. Just to summarise: the work of this bug is getting the user-oriented bookmarks file from 1.5 and checking it into the 1.7 trunk (primarily) and the 1.6 branch (secondarily.) That is what the blocker nomination relates to. Gerv
Created attachment 140136 [details] bookmarks.html changes from 1.4 bookmarks: removed hardcoded link to release notes releases/mozilla1.4/ updated support page to /support change /get-involved.html to about/get-involved.html removed ADD_DATE, LAST_CHARSET, etc. information www.dmoz.org -> dmoz.org (preferred address, see Home link in http://search.dmoz.org/cgi-bin/advanced_search.html
Daniel: why is your file based on the 1.4 bookmarks and not the new, user-friendly 1.5 bookmarks checked in under bug 218326? Gerv
no idea. The attachment is based on your file at bug 218326. btw, I'd like to see vivisimo.com listed under Search (I really miss Northernlight Search)
gerv, bug 51193 and this bug, which one should be fixed?
Daniel: this one :-) Vivisimo have a Mozilla search plugin on their front page if you are using Mozilla, so I say we include them as a mutual back-scratching exercise. Gerv
Comment on attachment 140136 [details] bookmarks.html Asa: this is the same as the 1.5 bookmarks you reviewed before. Gerv
*** Bug 51193 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 115567 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
can someone post a diff of the delta's between this file and the currently shipping file?
going to - this, we can take the change if it gets reviewed, but we probly won't hold the alpha for it.
Comment on attachment 141283 [details] bookmarks.html Asa - is now an OK time to do this? If so, please review/approve. Gerv
I'm not sure Asa reads bugmail - has someone asked him about this? could someone else do the review? and, in response to chofmann's comment, it's not really worth having a diff - i just did it and the only significant line that matches is the doctype. there are a couple of sites from the old file with new labels, but pretty much all of the existing bookmarks are removed in favour of the new selection.
looks like we did this in bug http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237340
Actually, that's quite a different set. For example, it's missing the useful QuickSearches and the range of search engines. Is anyone up for merging, in consultation with Asa, the best bits of the two? Gerv
well if anything further is going to be done, probably best to do it in the bug that overtook this one... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 237340 ***