256661 - use new images for extension and theme managers

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Firefox Graveyard :: Help Documentation, defect)

Description

[Steffen Wilberg]

Thanks to bug 248264, we've now got images for the extension and theme managers:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/help/1.0rc1/extension_manager.png
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/help/1.0rc1/theme_manager.png

Now we should start using them! :)

Comment 1

[Robert Parenton]

Small nit, but shouldn't we be using images with the official branded artwork? 
Look closely at the upper left-hand corner of the windows.

Comment 2

[Steffen Wilberg]

Robert, you're right. I already attached new images to bug 248264. They still
need to be compressed and shrunken though.

Comment 3

[R.J. Keller]

Moving to new Firefox Help owner.

Comment 4

[Jeff Walden (gone starting June 8)]

Steffen, can you do this?

Also, we need to create a new directory on m.o for 1.0 images, copy the 1.0pr
images over to it, make new ones where necessary (options, maybe others), and
then tweak the image URLs in Help to point to the new stuff.  There are a few
changes that would be present (options screenshots, perhaps others) that new
images would reflect.  I could do this, but I need to get the ssh stuff set up
for my gila account, because it doesn't work right now (don't know when that'd
be fixed).  That could be another bug if you don't want to fit it in here.

Comment 5

[Steffen Wilberg]

OK.
And I'll see if I can get my new gila to work :)

Comment 6

[Steffen Wilberg]

Attachment: patch

I guess it makes sense to insert the images between "go to Tools->Themes" and
"once in the themes manager...".

Comment 7

[Jeff Walden (gone starting June 8)]

Comment on attachment 159075 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

Fine by me.  The progression from menu path to screenshot makes sense.

In response to a comment in another bug on updating the copyright date, that's
something that's been done off and on for quite a while.  I remember once being
quite surprised by an r- when I didn't update the date (and I hadn't updated it
in any patch before then, either).  Doing it every time isn't a bad idea from
now on.  I don't think it's worth the effort to update the dates in current
files, tho, unless they get touched between now and 1.0.  If it gets touched,
fine, update it, but if it doesn't, it won't hurt to leave it with an old date.

Comment 8

[Steffen Wilberg]

Checked in br & trunk.

Asa suggested in the l10n chat (log in the l10n newsgroup) to use the late-l10n
from now on.