Closed
Bug 31020
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 25 years ago
Windows build won't start; splashscreen only
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Assigned: leaf)
References
Details
(Keywords: platform-parity, regression, smoketest)
summary says it all. using opt comm bits 2000.03.08.09 on winNT. start
mozilla.exe up and all that appears is the splashscreen, which just stays
there. don't even get the Profile Manager. here's console output:
Profile Manager : Profile Wizard and Manager activites : Begin
Profile Manager : Command Line Options : Begin
Entered MigrateProfileInfo.
Profile Manager : Command Line Options : End
WEBSHELL+ = 1
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM warning: Setting of property "java.compiler" is
ignored
Proxy Configuration: Browser Proxy Configuration
JavaScript Error: ReferenceError: srGetStrBundle is not defined
URL:
chrome://profile/content/profileManager.js
Line number: 23
*** Failed to load
overlay chrome://global/content/dialogOverlay.xul
apologies if this is a dup/known issue...
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
i installed using the installer, btw...
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Mozilla bits also show the same problem, changing summary...
Summary: commercial build won't start; splashscreen only → Windows build won't start; splashscreen only
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
When i run the build, after the initial install, i get a screwed up (all black,
minus some graphic ghost in the upper left hand corner) `Create New Profile'
window. Is it possible some xul is not getting packaged? I'll look at
yesterday's checkins.
Keywords: smoketest
| Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: ssu → ben
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
looks like packaging is screwed up again:
*** Failed to load overlay chrome://global/content/dialogOverlay.xul
in the console where i hang ("mozilla -console" gives you this output), i'll
find out why this xul file isn't in packaging.
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
I use window 98. I didn't have any problem to lauch today's build. What I did is
just clicked the win commercial build link on today's build notice. Everything
is working fine and I completed the smoke test.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Ok, checked the staging areas, all the correct files are there... checking the
xpi's on the server for corruption (but the .xul files that are missing are
certainly not installed in my local tree)
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 31028 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
| Reporter | ||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
i was able to reproduce this on win95.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
This bug is fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
I see this problem again on today's windows commercial build(03/09). REOPENING.
Status: VERIFIED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
this is the same thing that happened yesterday. I'm repackaging windows, and it
should be done shortly. I'll reannounce when ready. I'll ask leaf to take
another look at the win32 automation when he gets in today.
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 31175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
leaf thinks he knows what's wrong with the automation, so we should be able to
avoid this problem moving forward. basically, the perl open() call is timing
out before pkgcp.pl completes, so he's going to change it to a system() call.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
Fixed in the automation, verify on the next build (probably tomorrow morning)
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 20•25 years ago
|
||
weird that i cannot repro this with this morning's bits [2000.03.09.09, opt comm
on winNT]... mozregistry.day was changed upon installation, going by the file
mod date stamp (though i didn't trash it before installation); profiles weren't
changed, though...
Comment 21•25 years ago
|
||
we repackaged the bits. when we repackage with the new automation, it replaces
the existing bad bits rather than creating a new directory. You'll notice the
timestamp for the directory is 9am, but the files inside it are timestamped in
the 10 o'clock hour.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•