Closed
Bug 369819
Opened 19 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Database version warning doesn't refer to Lightning/Calendar
Categories
(Calendar :: Provider: Local Storage, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Lightning 0.5
People
(Reporter: jrossiter, Assigned: mattwillis)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 1 obsolete file)
|
44.03 KB,
image/jpeg
|
Details | |
|
7.94 KB,
patch
|
cmtalbert
:
first-review+
mvl
:
second-review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
30.55 KB,
image/png
|
mvl
:
ui-review+
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
Build Identifier: Mozilla-1.8 0.3.1pre 2007012705
Starting from build 2007012705 Thunderbird issues a warning on startup saying:
"The data in your profile was updated by a newer version of Thunderbird, and continuing will probably cause the information to be lost or corrupted. Thunderbird will now quit."
The dialog can be bypassed by pressing escape.
This isn't a Thunderbird issue, as reverting to the previous day's version of Lightning resolves the issue. The issue continues through at least today's build (2007020803).
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•19 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•19 years ago
|
||
Ya, we need to make it say "Your calendar data was..." so it's more clear.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Flags: blocking-calendar0.5+
OS: Windows XP → All
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: --- → Lightning 0.5
Version: unspecified → Lightning 0.3.1
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•19 years ago
|
||
I'm confused. Does this mean that the -latest nightlies have regressed from 0.4a1 to 0.3.1pre? If so, what does that mean, and where did the 0.4 builds go?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•19 years ago
|
||
Yes. We have a limited set of tinderboxes to build _and_ release from, so in order to get the 0.3.1 maintenance release complete _before_ the US Daylight Savings Time changes come into effect, we had to switch the Lightning branch tinderbox to build 0.3.1.
As soon as we ship 0.3.1, we'll return the tinderbox to building 0.4a1/0.5pre
Comment 5•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> Ya, we need to make it say "Your calendar data was..." so it's more clear.
That's exactly what I meant in Bug 357458 Comment #17.
Comment 6•19 years ago
|
||
Updating summary and severity since the message is shown on purpose but misleading.
Severity: critical → normal
Component: General → Provider: Local Storage
QA Contact: general → storage-provider
Summary: Thunderbird data integrity warning starting from build 2007012705 → Database version warning doesn't refer to Lightning/Calendar
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → lilmatt
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #256863 -
Flags: ui-review?(mvl)
Attachment #256863 -
Flags: second-review?(mvl)
Attachment #256863 -
Flags: first-review?(ctalbert.moz)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [patch in hand][review needed ctalbert mvl][ui-review needed mvl]
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 256863 [details] [diff] [review]
Adds "calendar" to the text. Changed the entity name to force l10n updates.
>-tooNewSchemaErrorText=The data in your profile was updated by a newer version of %1$S, and continuing will probably cause the information to be lost or corrupted. %1$S will now quit.
>+tooNewSchemaErrorBody=The calendar data in your profile was updated by a newer version of %1$S, and continuing will probably cause the information to be lost or corrupted. %1$S will now quit.
While this is indeed an improvement, it's not technically correct. If you only downgrade lghtning, but keep on using the same thunderbird, the message would blame thunderbird for changing the data. Which is wrong.
Would it be hard to really fix this, by saying what really changed the calendar data?
Comment 10•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 256863 [details] [diff] [review]
Adds "calendar" to the text. Changed the entity name to force l10n updates.
r=clint
Attachment #256863 -
Flags: first-review?(ctalbert.moz) → first-review+
Comment 11•19 years ago
|
||
Surely it's also wrong for Lightning to force Thunderbird to quit...
In the case of the standalone calendar application it may make sense. In the case of an extension to a mail application, it feels unfair - all that other data in my profile being denied to me...
Is it not possible to cause this to disable the extension until its cleared up rather than quitting the application? If it did that, then you could remove the calendars and re-add them from within Thunderbird...
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•19 years ago
|
||
This uses the app name to be more descriptive. Screenshot forthcoming.
Attachment #256863 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #257359 -
Flags: second-review?(mvl)
Attachment #257359 -
Flags: first-review?(ctalbert.moz)
Attachment #256863 -
Flags: ui-review?(mvl)
Attachment #256863 -
Flags: second-review?(mvl)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•19 years ago
|
||
Attachment #257360 -
Flags: ui-review?(mvl)
Comment 14•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 257360 [details]
Screenshot of above
ui-review=mvl
Attachment #257360 -
Flags: ui-review?(mvl) → ui-review+
Comment 15•19 years ago
|
||
I think Davids comment 11 is very reasonable. How can one update Lightning to the most recent version if Thunderbird doesn't start. I know, there is safe mode, but this needs action from the user.
Comment 16•19 years ago
|
||
The comment is right, but not for this bug. This bug is about cleaning up the message. There is no functionality change. Please file a new bug on the exit issue.
Comment 17•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 257359 [details] [diff] [review]
Addresses mvl's comments
This looks like a better approach. r=ctalbert
Attachment #257359 -
Flags: first-review?(ctalbert.moz) → first-review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 18•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #16)
> Please file a new bug on the exit issue.
bug 372868 has been filed for that
| Assignee | ||
Updated•19 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [patch in hand][review needed ctalbert mvl][ui-review needed mvl] → [patch in hand][review needed mvl][ui-review needed mvl]
Updated•19 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [patch in hand][review needed mvl][ui-review needed mvl] → [patch in hand][review needed mvl]
Comment 19•19 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 257359 [details] [diff] [review]
Addresses mvl's comments
r2=mvl
Attachment #257359 -
Flags: second-review?(mvl) → second-review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 20•19 years ago
|
||
Patch checked in on MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH and trunk.
-> FIXED
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [patch in hand][review needed mvl]
Comment 21•19 years ago
|
||
VERIFIED with Tb 2.0.0.x on WindowsXP when writing patch for bug 372868.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•18 years ago
|
Flags: blocking-calendar0.5+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•