Closed
Bug 387302
Opened 18 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
About dialog has no accesskey
Categories
(Calendar :: General, defect)
Calendar
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
0.7
People
(Reporter: ehsan.akhgari, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)
Details
(Keywords: access)
Attachments
(2 files)
7.44 KB,
patch
|
Fallen
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
600 bytes,
text/plain
|
Details |
Sunbird's about dialog does not have access keys. Bug 387015 tracks this for Firefox, and bug 387300 tracks this for Thunderbird. We should keep Sunbird's About dialog in sync.
I'll post a patch here soon.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•18 years ago
|
||
Patch to add the access key for Sunbird's About dialog Credits button. I have renamed the copyright and aboutLink entities as well for the sake of l10n tools.
Attachment #271443 -
Flags: review?(mostafah)
Comment 2•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 271443 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
Moving review to an active calendar developer
Attachment #271443 -
Flags: review?(mostafah) → review?(mvl)
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
Please also have a look at bug 387300 comment 3 to be consistent in naming the entities.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•18 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #3)
> Please also have a look at bug 387300 comment 3 to be consistent in naming the
> entities.
>
I agree that it's better to make the other entity names consistent, but I think it's out of this bug's scope.
I'm thinking maybe it's better to open a new meta bug to track this issue, and then file individual bugs to fix it in different places of the code. Finding the inconsistencies is not too difficult. It would mostly consist of taking a look at each product's dtd files...
What do you think?
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•18 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 271443 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
updating to reality: I won't be able to review this any time soon
Attachment #271443 -
Flags: review?(mvl)
Comment 7•18 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 271443 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
Philipp, can you take over the review from mvl, who just dropped this review.
Attachment #271443 -
Flags: review?(philipp)
Updated•18 years ago
|
Attachment #271443 -
Flags: review?(philipp) → review+
Comment 8•18 years ago
|
||
Looks good. Checked in on HEAD and MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH
-> FIXED
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•18 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → 0.7
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
verified with
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6pre) Gecko/20070720 Calendar/0.7pre
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Here is a Litmus test case for this bug. I'm not sure who to ask review for, though...
Attachment #273291 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #273291 -
Attachment mime type: application/txt → text/plain
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 273291 [details]
Litmus test case
No need to ask for a review of the litmus testcase. Just add it to litmus.mozilla.org and set the in-litmus field to '+'
Attachment #273291 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #11)
> (From update of attachment 273291 [details])
> No need to ask for a review of the litmus testcase. Just add it to
> litmus.mozilla.org and set the in-litmus field to '+'
>
I would, but I don't have the required access on litmus. I need someone else to check this in for me. And the reason I asked for a review was the instructions at <http://wiki.mozilla.org/Litmus:Adding_Testcases_to_Litmus> for non-admins.
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
Thanks for the test case, I will move it with others and them set flag to + do not worry about it, as long as in‑litmus=? we will not forget about it
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•