Closed Bug 406021 Opened 17 years ago Closed 17 years ago

Using classic mode in windows, left hand side of address/URL bar and search bar look wrong

Categories

(Firefox :: Shell Integration, defect)

x86
Windows 2000
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: stevee, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Keywords: regression)

Attachments

(3 files, 1 obsolete file)

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9b2pre) Gecko/2007112805 Minefield/3.0b2pre ID:2007112805 Check the screenshot. In Windows Classic mode, the URL bar and search bar looks strange, like it's trying to be 3D but failing. Looks normal: 20071123_2127_firefox-3.0b2pre.en-US.win32 Looks naff: 20071123_2208_firefox-3.0b2pre.en-US.win32 Checkins to module PhoenixTinderbox between 2007-11-23 21:27 and 2007-11-23 22:07 : http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?module=PhoenixTinderbox&date=explicit&mindate=1195882020&maxdate=1195884479 --> bug 398020
Do you mean the textfields themselves or the favicon and search engine boxes?
Morphing bug to cover the fact that the left hand side of the address bar and the left hand side of the search bar doesn't really fit.
Summary: Using classic mode in windows, address/URL bar and search bar look wrong → Using classic mode in windows, left hand side of address/URL bar and search bar look wrong
Attached patch patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Gavin: this is what I was referring to in bug 413312 comment 4.
Assignee: nobody → dao
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #298965 - Flags: review?(gavin.sharp)
Attached image screenshot
Comment on attachment 298965 [details] [diff] [review] patch >Index: browser/themes/winstripe/browser/browser.css > #urlbar > .autocomplete-history-dropmarker:hover { > background-color: -moz-dialog !important; >+ background-image: url(chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab-active-bkgnd.png); I wonder if it will perhaps upset themers that overriding that image will affect both the tab bar and location bar? >Index: browser/themes/winstripe/browser/searchbar.css > .searchbar-engine-button { >+ background-image: url(chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab-active-bkgnd.png); >+ background-repeat: repeat-x; For some reason that I don't fully understand, this styling doesn't apply to the button when there's a search engine to install (e.g. at any site that has an advertised search plugin, technorati.com and b.m.o).
(In reply to comment #5) > I wonder if it will perhaps upset themers that overriding that image will > affect both the tab bar and location bar? I can't think of such an image for the tabs that would look totally out of place for these button-like elements in the nav toolbar. I guess many themers don't particularly care about Windows Classic, so this would just work out of the box (and could therefore be considered a feature). Those who do care can change it easily. Alternatively, we could package the same image twice or rename the existing image to something more generic. Doesn't really sound appealing to me. > For some reason that I don't fully understand, this styling doesn't apply to > the button when there's a search engine to install (e.g. at any site that has > an advertised search plugin, technorati.com and b.m.o). Could it be that you accidentally added the background image to |.searchbar-engine-button > .button-box| rather than |.searchbar-engine-button|? |.searchbar-engine-button[addengines="true"] > .button-box| is where we add the blue coma, which would replace a previously set background image.
Attachment #298965 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #298965 - Flags: review?(gavin.sharp)
Assignee: dao → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Depends on: 414183
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9b5pre) Gecko/2008030405 Minefield/3.0b5pre ID:2008030405 Still doesn't look right to me dao. The inside bevel color is missing (compare the left hand side of the search bar).
Yes, it's round as per bug 414183. We don't draw the inside bevel because the theme code doesn't know about your OS theme. We could handle Windows 2000 as a special case, but that doesn't help Win XP/Vista Classic, which are more important targets.
Yes, I filed this bug against win2k, but I'm on XP now (where the screenshot was taken from).
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: