Closed
Bug 412773
Opened 17 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
GTK Toolkit arrows instead of stock icons for find toolbar
Categories
(Core :: Widget: Gtk, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla2.0b3
People
(Reporter: micmon, Assigned: ispence)
References
Details
Attachments
(6 files, 1 obsolete file)
|
2.48 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
4.41 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
20.98 KB,
patch
|
roc
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
33.15 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
|
12.92 KB,
patch
|
roc
:
review+
dao
:
review+
faaborg
:
ui-review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
12.94 KB,
patch
|
beltzner
:
approval2.0+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Perhaps the last place where native toolkit arrows would be nice:
The find bar currently uses gtk stock icons. Other GTK apps which have such a bar use gtk toolkit arrows instead. Looks very clean IMHO and improves platform integration.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•17 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•17 years ago
|
||
This is probably very easy to do now that we have those native look arrows nearly everywhere... can someone please implement it?
Updated•17 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•17 years ago
|
Component: Find Toolbar / FastFind → Widget: Gtk
Product: Firefox → Core
Updated•17 years ago
|
QA Contact: fast.find → gtk
Comment 3•17 years ago
|
||
This patch requires bug 416003 to be fixed and bug 416868 too.
Attachment #305358 -
Flags: review?(frnchfrgg-mozbugs)
Comment 4•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 305358 [details] [diff] [review]
Draw native arrows for the arrows in the find toolbar
I just skim through the patch for now since I don't have a lot of time...
First, I'm not qualified to review the skin part of the patch. I didn't see anything wrong, but you need a review from someone else (rflint, enndeakin ?)
Second, I see you still use gButtonArrowWidget which is created as an arrow pointing down; are you sure that the requisition will be always good regardless of the type of arrow you want (that is the arrow requisition is a square), and that every engine will draw the arrow correctly (this one is almost certainly a safe bet) ?
If you are sure that it's good, add a comment in the code, please.
I didn't find glaring implementation errors, I'll do a more thorough review soon.
Comment 5•17 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 305358 [details] [diff] [review]
Draw native arrows for the arrows in the find toolbar
> aWidgetType == NS_THEME_TOOLBAR_DUAL_BUTTON ||
> aWidgetType == NS_THEME_TOOLBAR_BUTTON_DROPDOWN ||
> aWidgetType == NS_THEME_DROPDOWN ||
> aWidgetType == NS_THEME_DROPDOWN_BUTTON) {
>- if (aWidgetType == NS_THEME_TOOLBAR_BUTTON_DROPDOWN)
>- aFrame = aFrame->GetParent();
>-
> PRBool menuOpen = CheckBooleanAttr(aFrame, nsWidgetAtoms::open);
> aState->depressed = IsCheckedButton(aFrame) || menuOpen;
> // we must not highlight buttons with open drop down menus on hover.
> aState->inHover = aState->inHover && !menuOpen;
> }
>
What is this for; is that related to this bug ? I'm puzzled.
Apart from that (and previous comments), I think the patch is good. I won't set review+ until you explain me why you can use an always down pointing arrow widget, though.
Comment 6•17 years ago
|
||
I may take over this bug if Teune's still away/busy.
Comment 7•17 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #6)
> I may take over this bug if Teune's still away/busy.
>
Yes please do, I'm sorry but I'm really busy atm, and this bug will probably be fixed much faster when you're working on it.
To answer your comments:
(In reply to comment #4)
> Second, I see you still use gButtonArrowWidget which is created as an arrow
> pointing down; are you sure that the requisition will be always good regardless
> of the type of arrow you want (that is the arrow requisition is a square), and
> that every engine will draw the arrow correctly (this one is almost certainly a
> safe bet) ?
>
Yes, this will always be correct: the requisition of the arrow is always the same for different arrow types, it is the sum of MIN_ARROW_SIZE defined in gtkarrow.c (always a square) and the padding (MISC->xpad / MISC->ypad) which can not be different for different arrow types AFAIK.
(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 305358 [details] [diff] [review])
> > aWidgetType == NS_THEME_TOOLBAR_DUAL_BUTTON ||
> > aWidgetType == NS_THEME_TOOLBAR_BUTTON_DROPDOWN ||
> > aWidgetType == NS_THEME_DROPDOWN ||
> > aWidgetType == NS_THEME_DROPDOWN_BUTTON) {
> >- if (aWidgetType == NS_THEME_TOOLBAR_BUTTON_DROPDOWN)
> >- aFrame = aFrame->GetParent();
> >-
> > PRBool menuOpen = CheckBooleanAttr(aFrame, nsWidgetAtoms::open);
> > aState->depressed = IsCheckedButton(aFrame) || menuOpen;
> > // we must not highlight buttons with open drop down menus on hover.
> > aState->inHover = aState->inHover && !menuOpen;
> > }
> >
>
> What is this for; is that related to this bug ? I'm puzzled.
>
A few lines above this, the following code is added:
> stateFrame = aFrame = aFrame->GetParent();
That is necessary to get the correct disabled state and eventState for TOOLBAR_BUTTON_DROPDOWN as well as the new arrows, from their parents. So aFrame is now already set to aFrame->GetParent().
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•17 years ago
|
||
_FrnchFrgg_, I'M currently going over all my open bugs and I noticed that all the dependencies for this bug have been solved by now. Any chance you will be able to get this in for 3.0?
Comment 9•17 years ago
|
||
I've absolutely no free time until thursday evening (French time), sorry.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•17 years ago
|
||
Any chance this could still make it into 3.0?
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
Not if you count on me, I have no time currently.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•17 years ago
|
||
Finally had some free time and since it seems like today is a cutoff point, wanted to get this done.
This patch also improves the look for bug 419617 (without technically solving it)
Assignee: twanno → ispence
Attachment #305358 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #320317 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #320317 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #305358 -
Flags: review?(frnchfrgg-mozbugs)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•17 years ago
|
Attachment #320317 -
Flags: review?(gavin.sharp)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•17 years ago
|
||
This seems more suited to stock icons. There are no equivalent stock icons to these themed arrows?
BTW it's definitely too late to take this for Firefox 3.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•17 years ago
|
||
We currently use stock back and forward images (see attachment 297534 [details])
However, in the only example we have of a similar find bar (Epiphany), the gtk widget arrows are used.
Comment 16•17 years ago
|
||
IMO I think stock icons look better, plus it would fit better with other DEs.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 17•17 years ago
|
||
I guess the "stock icons look better" part is very subjective (I don't really have any opinion regarding this but I am used to see the toolkit < > in other apps).
Well, even if this is not changed for the find bar, having the 4 direction arrows in for addon themes would be nice. Also, while not perfect, the add bookmark dialog looks a lot better as shown above compared to the broken look it has ATM (though we should look for a better solution for FX3+1)
Comment on attachment 320317 [details] [diff] [review]
Adds 4 directions of native arrows for people to use as they please. Also fixes this bug
We don't seem to have a compelling reason to take this at the moment. If someone comes up with one, we can revive the patch --- there's probably nothing wrong with the code.
Attachment #320317 -
Flags: superreview?(roc)
Attachment #320317 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #320317 -
Flags: review?(gavin.sharp)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 19•15 years ago
|
||
...years later...
>> We don't seem to have a compelling reason to take this at the moment.
>> If someone comes up with one, we can revive the patch --- there's
>> probably nothing wrong with the code.
GNOME has moved to a "no icons on buttons" default look and Fx4 respects this setting... on all buttons, except the find bar buttons. This looks weird.
I guess we could make those buttons play by the GNOME rules but that would mean having text labels ONLY I guess (done this way by Tomboy notes btw, I don't really like it). Reviving the patch and using the "<" and ">" toolkit arrows would solve the problem in a more elegant way I think.
Comment on attachment 320317 [details] [diff] [review]
Adds 4 directions of native arrows for people to use as they please. Also fixes this bug
okay then!
Attachment #320317 -
Flags: review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 21•15 years ago
|
||
Michael, can you take this bug over? I haven't had a source base for a couple years, so I'm not able to verify if this patch would still apply smoothly, since it's quite possible the source has changed a bit in 2 years.
Honestly, I don't even remember if this is the part where I request sr or not
| Reporter | ||
Comment 22•15 years ago
|
||
Ian, the patch does in fact not apply anymore but I should not have a lot of problems getting it to work again.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 23•15 years ago
|
||
Turns out nearly nothing changed during those years so this was trivial. Patch tested and does what it is supposed to do.
Do I have to ask for review now?
Comment on attachment 458217 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch updated for latest central
I already reviewed it. You can land this.
Attachment #458217 -
Flags: review+
Comment 25•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #24)
> You can land this.
The theme stuff still needs review.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 26•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #25)
> The theme stuff still needs review.
So the correct approach is to request ui-request from (according to 1), you? :)
[1] http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/review.html
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #458217 -
Flags: review?(dao)
Comment 27•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 297536 [details]
> Native (gnome help browser, next button has mouse hovering)
The help browser doesn't seem to have these buttons anymore.
(In reply to comment #19)
> >> We don't seem to have a compelling reason to take this at the moment.
> >> If someone comes up with one, we can revive the patch --- there's
> >> probably nothing wrong with the code.
>
> GNOME has moved to a "no icons on buttons" default look and Fx4 respects this
> setting... on all buttons, except the find bar buttons. This looks weird.
We respect it for buttons but generally not for toolbarbuttons. That matches the intent of the GNOME setting, I think.
Comment 28•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 458217 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch updated for latest central
>+.expander-up > hbox {
>+ -moz-appearance: button-arrow-up;
> }
...
>+.expander-down > hbox {
>+ -moz-appearance: button-arrow-down;
> }
Use .button-box instead of hbox and replace the tab with two spaces.
The findbar change should get ui-reviewed.
Attachment #458217 -
Flags: ui-review?(faaborg)
Attachment #458217 -
Flags: review?(dao)
Attachment #458217 -
Flags: review+
| Reporter | ||
Comment 29•15 years ago
|
||
The find bar may really be a corner case. Personally, I see it as a place which does *not* fall under the "use button icons" category... historicly, this has been a dialog window where "previous" and "next" were real (= no icons)
buttons.
In the end, doing what the official GNOME web browser (Epiphany) does can't be
a bad thing, integration wise.
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #458217 -
Flags: ui-review?(faaborg) → ui-review+
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #459007 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Comment 30•15 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 459007 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch updated again (Dao's u-r)
a=beltzner
Attachment #459007 -
Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0+
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 31•15 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla2.0b3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•