473834 - Mail headers are unreadable in both normal and "all" modes due to size of "more"

Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME

(Thunderbird :: Message Reader UI, defect, P1)

Description

[Marcia Knous [:marcia]]

Seen while running the one of the latest shredder nightlies, could be a profile issue Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090115 Shredder/3.0b2pre

See attached screenshot

Comment 1

[Marcia Knous [:marcia]]

Attachment: Screenshot of mail header

I am running Mac 10.5.6 on a MBP

Comment 2

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

screen shot looks like "more" is being displayed when it shouldn't be (there's no overflow of addresses), and it's displayed too large.  I wouldn't think this is profile related unless Marcia has some header css or header-affecting addons.

I'm not finding any bugs describing this, but maybe my search stinks**
Tagging dmose who iirc is handling header fallout.

** https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=header&product=MailNews+Core&product=Thunderbird&product=Toolkit&version=Trunk&version=Trunk&resolution=---&bug_severity=major&bug_severity=normal&bug_severity=minor&chfieldfrom=180d&chfieldto=Now&chfield=%5BBug+creation%5D

Comment 3

[Wayne Mery (:wsmwk)]

rewind - bug 471312 has some screen shots that show "more" when it shouldn't be there

Comment 4

[Gary Kwong [:gkw] [:nth10sd] (NOT official MoCo now)]

I must say that I see the "More" word present for the sake of being there rather than for the sake of being really useful, sometimes there just isn't anything "more" to see. i.e. the pixels shift by a few insignificant spaces and there weren't any email addresses previously blocked.

Comment 5

[Dan Mosedale (:dmosedale, :dmose)]

I ran into this yesterday.  What Gary's describing in comment 4 might be part of this bug, or it might be separate.

Comment 6

[pdpd]

This problem was declared "FIXED" in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456818 -- but it isn't.  As I noted there, I have the problem as well.

Comment 7

[Dan Mosedale (:dmosedale, :dmose)]

From what I can tell, the bug described in comment 0 is gone, so marking this as WORKSFORME.  Please reopen if you disagree.

The issues described in the other comments here are covered by bug 471312 and bug 469878.