Closed
Bug 513012
Opened 16 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
deleting an IMAP subfolder leaves the folder visible
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Folder and Message Lists, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird 3.0rc1
People
(Reporter: brandt24, Assigned: Bienvenu)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [no l10n impact])
Attachments
(1 file)
808 bytes,
patch
|
standard8
:
review+
standard8
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090827 Shredder/3.0b4pre
deleting an IMAP subfolder from trash does not remove the folder until restarting TB
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create an IMAP account.
2. Create a folder.
3. Delete it.
4. Make sure it is moved to Trash.
5. Now try to delete this subfolder.
Actual Results:
After being deleted it is still visible.
Expected Results:
The folder should be gone.
Summary: deleting an IMAP subfolder → deleting an IMAP subfolder leaves the folder visible
Version: unspecified → 3.0
Tested it with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090909 Shredder/3.0b4pre, the issue is still present.
Severity: normal → major
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3?
Comment 4•16 years ago
|
||
I just tried this and it WFM.
Can you attach a protocol log showing a failing delete?
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
Keywords: qawanted
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•16 years ago
|
||
I believe in some cases some piece of code is holding the db open and preventing us from removing the folder - but restarting should fix it, I believe.
Assignee: nobody → bienvenu
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3? → blocking-thunderbird3+
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0rc1
Comment 6•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #0)
> deleting an IMAP subfolder from trash does not remove the folder until restarting TB
Restart of Tb is really mandatory?
This kind of issue is folder pane refresh/update issue in many cases. And, AFAIR, one of next was effective manual recovery procedure in many cases.
(1) Collapse/re-expand, parent folder, account.
(2) If (1) is not effective, open new Tb window, and close old Tb window.
Context menu of account/folder, "Open".
Is (1) or (2) effectibve in your environemnt?
Does same problem occur with "Empty Trash"?
By the way, I saw similar phenomenon by rename of Gmail IMAP folder with Tb 2009/9 /09 build. (1) was effective recovery procedure in my case.
I just tried it with:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090913 Shredder/3.0b4pre
and the issue is still present. I created a new folder called Folder to be deleted, which I then deleted and it was moved to Trash. After trying to delete it from there, the folder is still present. After a few clicks around in the program I get an alert: The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded:Mailbox doesn't exist: Trash.Folder to be deleted
Restarting TB twice finally took the folder away.
okay, I created the log, how shall I send it to you? Do I need to sanitize it someway too?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•16 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure that a log is going to be helpful here, since it's the local client code that's holding the db open. If I can't reproduce this, I might ask for a log...
Status: UNCONFIRMED → ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed: true
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
Ok.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•16 years ago
|
||
Make nsImapMailFolder::Delete tell all db listeners about the db going away, even if its cached db pointer has already been cleared. nsLocalMailFolder::Delete already does this.
Attachment #400816 -
Flags: superreview?(bugzilla)
Attachment #400816 -
Flags: review?(bugzilla)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [has patch for r/sr standard8] → [no l10n impact][has patch for r/sr standard8]
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•16 years ago
|
||
would be nice to get this reviewed and landed soon, because I believe there are a fair number of bugs that can be closed once this lands.
Updated•16 years ago
|
Attachment #400816 -
Flags: superreview?(bugzilla)
Attachment #400816 -
Flags: superreview+
Attachment #400816 -
Flags: review?(bugzilla)
Attachment #400816 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•16 years ago
|
||
fix checked in - I'll try to find the various bugs that also are fixed by this...
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact][has patch for r/sr standard8] → [no l10n impact]
Comment 16•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #14)
> fix checked in - I'll try to find the various bugs that also are fixed by
> this...
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; nl; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090922 Lightning/1.0pre Shredder/3.0pre
i don't see it fixed (the problem reported in bug 517419)
Comment 17•16 years ago
|
||
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; nl; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20090923 Lightning/1.0pre Shredder/3.0pre
not fixed
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•16 years ago
|
||
it's working here - I can't reproduce any issues, whereas it was easy to reproduce earlier.
Comment 19•16 years ago
|
||
Then is bug 517419 not a dupe of this bug
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•16 years ago
|
||
They both work here - if you're seeing 517419 but not 513012, then I would say your situation is not a dup. Are you seeing this bug, bug 513012?
Comment 21•16 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #20)
> They both work here - if you're seeing 517419 but not 513012, then I would say
> your situation is not a dup. Are you seeing this bug, bug 513012?
I can delete a folder so i don't see this bug (anymore).
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•16 years ago
|
||
ok, I'll re-mark this fixed and undupe bug 517419.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 16 years ago → 16 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•