Closed
Bug 515653
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
[faceted search]: styling needed for "List all N"
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Search, defect)
Thunderbird
Search
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird 3.0b4
People
(Reporter: davida, Assigned: andreasn)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [no l10n impact])
Attachments
(3 files, 5 obsolete files)
5.16 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
49.43 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
4.36 KB,
patch
|
andreasn
:
review+
andreasn
:
ui-review+
standard8
:
approval-thunderbird3+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
If you do a search that returns a set with facets w/ more than 8 values, we display a clickable link that says "List all N" (where N is some number). It looks ugly, should be styled.
Flags: blocking-thunderbird3+
Updated•15 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact]
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
possibly somewhat outside the scope of this bug, but what about not showing a button as all, but instead just showing more content automatically? http://humanized.com/weblog/2006/04/25/no_more_more_pages/ "Don’t force the user to ask for more content: just give it to them."
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
I think it could be a good idea to style it as a native button, will cook up a patch.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
The other option we could do is this kind of flat-button appearance. Gray on regular, blue on hover (with hand pointer), slightly rounded. I think we should use these kind of buttons in other places of the facets interface too (like the show-more-people, show all as list, sort order etc.)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Trying to look at this on a wider scale, here is what we could do for the other widgets.
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
As a temporary measure just for b4, we're going to push out minimal changes as described in the first patch of bug 515801 (discussion which should have happened here, sorry)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
more to come soonish, but this can land in the mean time
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
you gotta move quickly in these days running up to code freeze :)
Attachment #400104 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•15 years ago
|
||
makes "Show all" and relevance/date hover effects work properly as well.
Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #400152 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #400152 -
Flags: review?(clarkbw)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•15 years ago
|
||
and here is yet another update
Attachment #400134 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #400152 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #400183 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #400183 -
Flags: review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #400152 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #400152 -
Flags: review?(clarkbw)
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
I've made some slight updates to the patch. The patch as was submitted looked good but I made a few changes to it. I'm going to ask David for review since he's the only other one who knows this area well.
Attachment #400183 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #400214 -
Flags: review?(david.ascher)
Attachment #400183 -
Flags: ui-review?(clarkbw)
Attachment #400183 -
Flags: review?(clarkbw)
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
The patch didn't apply cleanly on my tree. I did a manual tweak, and it mostly works for me. On the mac, though, the bold text for .facet-more classes is too bold, too hard to read. Does it look ok w/ a normal weight?
Assignee: nobody → nisses.mail
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
One other comment: the blue subject text on grey background when hovering over a message actually decreases the contrast, which feels off. Maybe a darker shade of blue? Maybe a lighter background? Maybe a more sophisticated border with a very light background?
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #11) > The patch didn't apply cleanly on my tree. Strange I pulled the latest source before making that patch > I did a manual tweak, and it mostly works for me. On the mac, though, the bold > text for .facet-more classes is too bold, too hard to read. Does it look ok w/ > a normal weight? we could tone that down to a normal font weight.
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12) > One other comment: the blue subject text on grey background when hovering over > a message actually decreases the contrast, which feels off. Maybe a darker > shade of blue? Maybe a lighter background? Maybe a more sophisticated border > with a very light background? Agreed. Maybe we can address the results list in a separate bug though. Easily arguable that the result list is more important but this bug seemed more overall to me.
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
with a non-bold .facet-more, a new bug for the results list, and a patch that applies cleanly on the real tree (mine doesn't matter ;-) r=davida.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
Attachment #400214 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #400365 -
Flags: ui-review+
Attachment #400365 -
Flags: review+
Attachment #400214 -
Flags: review?(david.ascher)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
and opened Bug 516261 about further improving the search results
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact] → [no l10n impact][ready for checkin]
Reporter | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #400365 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird3?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #400365 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird3? → approval-thunderbird3+
Comment 18•15 years ago
|
||
Checked in: http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/346b3de0d125
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [no l10n impact][ready for checkin] → [no l10n impact]
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 3.0b4
Updated•15 years ago
|
Component: Mail Window Front End → Search
QA Contact: front-end → search
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•