Closed
Bug 54975
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Mac installer setup type dialog UI issues
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Installer, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
Future
People
(Reporter: sfraser_bugs, Assigned: slogan)
References
Details
The Mac installer has a number of UI issues that make it confusing for the user and unsightly. * General appearance: The installer should use the Appearance dialog background color of gray, and needs a higher quality PICT for the logo that works on a gray background. * Screen 1 -- license Can we soft-wrap the text? * Screen 2 -- "Welcome" The text here looks pretty ugly; can we use styled text, and make the header bold, for example? It also contains the recommendation that the user should quit other applications. If we really mean this, then we should force other applications to quit, as most installers do. And why don't we just put the readme in this textfield on this screen? * Screen 3 -- installation type, location This screen is too busy; the user must deal with 2 important choices (where to install, what to install). The popup to choose installation type firstly too short to show the name of the default install ("Recommended Inst.."), and, since it applies just to the box below, should be part of the group box, not a separate item above it. The contents of the group box are also messy; we need to display that gets installed in a list or set of bullets, not a flat string which is hard to read. And why don't the contents of this list correspond to the checkable items in the Custom install screen? I think what we should do here is not have separate 'custom install' and regular install screens, but combine both, as many installers do, having a scrollable list of checkboxes that are checked and unchecked automatically depending on whether you choose minimal, regular, or custom install. The user should also be able to check and uncheck the boxes at will, and we should warn them if they are installing a set of options that won't run. Currently, there is no way to use the installer to install an optional component over an existing installation (is there?) The 'Installation location' pane looks cramped, and it would be nice to see the full path to the installation folder. Also, double-clicking on the folder/disk icon should reveal that folder in the Finder. * Screen 4 (recommended install) This screen has a popup with no label, containing a list of (I presume) download sites, and a text string saying "Click Install to proceed with this installation." Two issues: i) the popup needs an explanative label ii) the "click install" label should be BELOW the popup, since you only want to proceed after you've reviewed and selected a download location. * Screens 4 & 5 (if custom install is selected) This is the list box that violates a bunch of HIG recommendations. You need to drop the mouseover list highlighting, and enable arrow keys to move the selection in the list. I think this screen should be amalgamated with the previous one anyway. And the descriptions need work; they are much too short to be useful. For example, the Spell Checker description reads "For use with Mail & News and Composer." Ohmygod, there is a second screen of options. Why not amalgamate this with the first list, separating these from those with a separator in the list? Again, descriptions are uselss. What is a "language pack"? I won't comment on the download UI, which we know is awful. The rest of the installation process is OK, apart from the very end -- Once installation is complete, we now fire up the installed app with no user intervention. I think this is bad. I think the installer should have a final dialog that says "Installation is complete. To run <appname> now, click ...." etc. I'm sure there are many users who would like to take defensive action before running the app for the first time.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Simon, please report only one issue per bug report, otherwise it's impossible to track them. * Using the Appearance background color: bug 28577. * Using a logo with a transparente background: bug 33371. * Soft-wrapping the license text: not currently reported (AFAIK). * Ugly welcome text: bug 50485. * Forcing other apps to quit: not currently reported. * Combining the installation type and component listing pages: mentioned in bug 18674. * Merging the component selection with the group box: not currently reported. * Presenting components which will be installed as a list: mentioned in bug 18674. * Ugly display of installation location: bug 25755. * Not showing the full path: not currently reported. * Turning the installation location folder into a real live icon: not currently reported. * Giving the list of download sites a title: not a Mozilla bug. * Bad highlighting of components: bug 18674. * Bad component descriptions: bug 47959. * Awful download UI: not a Mozilla bug. (What der hey? I redesigned that for you before beta1. What's taken so long?) * Automatically running the app: not a Mozilla bug. Please file the Netscape-specific bugs as separate bugs in Bugscape, and the other bugs as individual bugs in Bugzilla.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Sorry for the dup info, mpt beat me to this. I will respond now anyways. General appearance: Platinum appearance bug 28577. Screen 1: Not sure I understand the problem with the license. Screen 2: Welcome text is ugly bug 50485 Screen 3: Different installs have different components which is why the components shown for each type differ from what is checkable (and hence different than what you see in the cutom install screen -- note that the custom install description on the setup type dialog (screen 3) does not contain any item enumeration. The installer is not designed to install additional components, you are right. The thought goes something along the lines that the user should return to Netcenter to use XPInstall through the SmartUpdate site to install additional components if they so choose. The marketing folks can better present the justification for this, I'm sure. I just work here ;o) Screen 4: (Recommended Install) The real bug is that when the zippies are local the popup shouldn't appear. We should fix this for RTM. Spun off rtm-nominated bug 54990. Screen 4 & 5: (Custom Install) HIG violation bug 18674. The text strings were provided by marketing. The decision to have two dialogs: custom and then additions was requested by marketing (I tried lobbying against this decision but was out-numbered:o)). I am cc'ing Todd Pringle and Bijal Shah (CPM). If you choose to lobby against this extra dialog they would be the appropriate folks to start a discussion with. The language packs were requested by i18n. I believe Jaime would be the appropriate product manager to start a discussion with regarding those zippies. Launching the app was a profile manager and migration requirement. Steve Elmer would be the appropriate person to take this up with. Spun off bug 54991 for teh install completed dialog RFE (non-rtm nominated as of now). The outstanding issue we can use this bug to track would be: The setup type dialog (aka screen 3) is too busy. 1> Rearrange items in bullets. 2> Add a scroll bar to the item list. If we don't do item 1 and 2 we should change the text and drop the item enumeration. 3> Move the icon to correctly display the installation location folder/disk. 4> Grow the popup width to accomodate the largest install type string. 5> Double clicking on the disk/folder icon should open it in the Finder.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: INVALID → ---
Summary: Mac installer UI issues → Mac installer setup dialog UI issues
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
CC'ing the product managers I referenced above.
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Updated•24 years ago
|
Summary: Mac installer setup dialog UI issues → Mac installer setup type dialog UI issues
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
> Not sure I understand the problem with the license.
Right now you have hard-wrapped text that goes in there, so the text does not
wrap to fit the width of the scrolling box. It should.
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Adding danielmc, msanz and mcarlson to cc: list.
Updated•24 years ago
|
QA Contact: gemal → gbush
Updated•24 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → P2
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Over to Syd for installer bug triage
Assignee: sgehani → syd
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Quoth Steve Dagley: "The Mac installer code was never Carbonized and there is no intention to ever change that." http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=yahoo_com-77F6E8.09344011022003%40h-204-29-187-156.netscape.com http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=avkj4k%24ihs2%40ripley.netscape.com
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•