Closed
Bug 605179
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Fix build warnings in gfx/
Categories
(Core :: Graphics, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: Ms2ger, Assigned: Ms2ger)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [build_warning])
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
|
18.05 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Flags: in-testsuite-
Attachment #484015 -
Flags: review?(roc)
+ PRInt32 major = 0, minor = 0, final = 0;
Move these assignments to a "default:" case in the switch (and put an NS_ERROR there to say that it's unreached)
+ FcPattern* pattern = NULL;
I don't understand this one. pattern is assigned along both branches of the 'if'. Why is this needed?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> + PRInt32 major = 0, minor = 0, final = 0;
>
> Move these assignments to a "default:" case in the switch (and put an NS_ERROR
> there to say that it's unreached)
Ok.
> + FcPattern* pattern = NULL;
>
> I don't understand this one. pattern is assigned along both branches of the
> 'if'. Why is this needed?
No idea. Compiler being stupid, I suppose.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2)
> > + FcPattern* pattern = NULL;
> >
> > I don't understand this one. pattern is assigned along both branches of the
> > 'if'. Why is this needed?
>
> No idea. Compiler being stupid, I suppose.
Seems like it actually wasn't necessary. Not sure what happened here.
Attachment #484015 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #491902 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #484015 -
Flags: review?(roc)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Merged to tip.
Attachment #491902 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #492051 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #491902 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #492051 -
Flags: review?(roc) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #492051 -
Flags: approval2.0?
Updated•15 years ago
|
Attachment #492051 -
Flags: approval2.0? → approval2.0+
| Assignee | ||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 6•15 years ago
|
||
patching file gfx/thebes/gfxASurface.cpp
Hunk #1 FAILED at 481
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 7•15 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
so, that mathematical impossibility isn't. it's a c feature:
<signed int> <mod> <unsigned int> is underspecified.
e.g. -1 % 2 could be 1 or -1.
Comment 10•14 years ago
|
||
I would have rather we didn't take the qcms changes here. qcms is written in the subset of c99 supported by MSVC which include c++ style comments.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•