Closed
Bug 61664
(xlink)
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Implement full XLink
Categories
(Core :: XML, enhancement, P3)
Core
XML
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Future
People
(Reporter: dr, Assigned: hjtoi-bugzilla)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
Implement full XLink support in Mozilla. (placeholder)
dependant on bug 59783. also contingent on refactoring of xml content sink,
probably...
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
I just wrote the beginnings of a link manager design at:
http://www.mozilla.org/newlayout/xml/lmdesign.html
It will probably take some time to update...
I removed the dependancy to dynamic XPath. XLink does not depend on XPointer or
XPath. XPointer can augment XLinks, providing ways to point to fragments of
documents, although arguably extended XLinks are nearly useless without XPointer
implementation. Right now we only support the IDLoc short hand fragment identifier.
Also extended XLinks do not depend on content sink refactoring.
No longer depends on: 59783
doesn't look like i'll be doing any xml work anytime soon :( ... reassigning to
heikki for safekeeping.
Assignee: dr → heikki
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Target Milestone: mozilla1.2 → Future
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
I'll slate this for mozilla1.2 for now, as the rest of the XLink/XPointer work.
Target Milestone: Future → mozilla1.2
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
XLINK related. Changing QA contact to bsharma@netscape.com
QA Contact: petersen → bsharma
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Target Milestone: mozilla1.2 → Future
Updated•20 years ago
|
Comment 7•19 years ago
|
||
Simple XLink is enough (and nobody uses that anyway).
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
QA Contact: bsharma → ian
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
Can we consider reopening this? I'm not a Firefox dev, but given that XLink is already supported in SVG, it shouldn't be too hard to implement for XML in general, right? Or am I missing something?
Updated•5 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(peterv)
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
It's not easier or harder if it's already supported in SVG. But I don't think it would make sense to expand the support to XML in general (note also that SVG 2 started to deprecate it).
Flags: needinfo?(peterv)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•