Closed Bug 660531 (bz-release-402) Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

Release Bugzilla 4.1.3, 4.0.2, 3.6.6 and 3.4.12

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Bugzilla-General, defect)

4.1.2
defect
Not set
blocker

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: LpSolit, Assigned: mkanat)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 2 obsolete files)

We currently have 5 security bugs which are being fixed these days, so it makes sense to do security releases in the coming days or weeks (I would say within 2-3 weeks), see bug 660528 for details.

Also, we have some hard blockers for 4.0.2: bug 655912 and bug 656769, which must also be fixed before we release anything.
Flags: blocking4.2+
Flags: blocking4.0.2+
Flags: blocking3.6.6+
Flags: blocking3.4.12+
Oh, I also would like these releases being available before we branch for 4.2, because it's a pain to commit on several branches, especially security bugs!
Alias: bz-release-402
Blocks: bz-release
  I plan to start working on this release next week.
Depends on: 675751
Depends on: 675752
Depends on: 675754
Attached patch Website Updates, v1 (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Website updates without the secadv.
Assignee: general → mkanat
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #550537 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment on attachment 550537 [details] [diff] [review]
Website Updates, v1

>=== modified file 'Bugzilla/DB/Schema.pm'
>+            id     => {TYPE => 'MEDIUMSERIAL', NOTNULL => 1,
>+                       PRIMARYKEY => 1},

Hum...
Attachment #550537 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review-
Attachment #550537 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #550865 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment on attachment 550865 [details] [diff] [review]
Website Updates, v2

You should update the RC date at http://www-stage.bugzilla.org/releases/4.2/. Otherwise looks good. r=LpSolit
Attachment #550865 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
Release underway.
Attached file Release Announcement, v1 (obsolete) —
Attachment #550909 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Fix the 4.1.2 paragraph.
Attachment #550909 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #550909 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Attachment #550911 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment on attachment 550911 [details]
Release Announcement, v2

r=LpSolit
Attachment #550911 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
Diff files about 3.6.6, e.g. bugzilla-3.6.*-to-3.6.6-nodocs.diff.gz look wrong to me. There are > 100 Kb and contain the removal of files in lib/CGI/. I don't think lib/CGI/ should appear in these diffs.
bugzilla-update.xml updated.
Website updated, announcements sent. Release is done. :-)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #11)
> Diff files about 3.6.6, e.g. bugzilla-3.6.*-to-3.6.6-nodocs.diff.gz look
> wrong to me. There are > 100 Kb and contain the removal of files in
> lib/CGI/. I don't think lib/CGI/ should appear in these diffs.

  So, I looked into this, and there is something very bad about the way diff's --exclude parameter works--it does not match paths, only singular file names. As a result, I can't find a way to exclude the base lib/ dir without the docs/lib dir being excluded. :-/
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: