Closed
Bug 662015
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Dualbuttons in message header have no right margin
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Theme, defect)
Tracking
(thunderbird6 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird 7.0
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
thunderbird6 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: squib, Assigned: squib)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
14.10 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
12.72 KB,
image/png
|
Details | |
832 bytes,
patch
|
bwinton
:
review+
standard8
:
approval-comm-aurora+
standard8
:
approval-thunderbird5.0-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
As seen in the attached screenshot, the dualbuttons ("reply all" and "save") have no right margin, which looks strange. The "reply all" button also has a too-large left margin. This is a minor issue, but still kinda annoying, especially for the "save" button, which defaults to being the rightmost one.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
In Bug 618611 I solved this. Andreasn hasn't decided, if he wants this change. If not, I can use this Bug.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Here's a patch that fixes this and makes dualbuttons use the same margins as everything else.
Assignee: nobody → squibblyflabbetydoo
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: review?(bwinton)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Oh, good to see that you already noticed this. :) I suppose either way is fine with me, though I think the spacing between buttons in your version matches Firefox, whereas mine doesn't. Still, if bug 618611 doesn't make it into Miramar, this might, since it's a smaller fix...
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 537320 [details] [diff] [review]
A patch to fix this
Review of attachment 537320 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Does this only happen under Aero?
If so, the change looks good to me, although I would prefer getting bug 618611 in instead…
Thanks,
Blake.
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: review?(bwinton) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> Does this only happen under Aero?
I guess it depends on what you mean by "Aero". It happens in the "Windows 7 Basic" theme, but not in the XP theme. At least I think it's ok for XP; everything worked as of a few weeks ago when I was on XP, but I've yet to set up an XP VM to test things out now that I'm on Windows 7.
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> Does this only happen under Aero?
Yes, XP is okay
> If so, the change looks good to me, although I would prefer getting bug
> 618611 in instead…
Andreasn has some problems with his Win machine for the review. If this lands I can update the patch for bug 618611.
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Well, it's been a while. I say we check this in, because it's been reviewed, and update the patch for bug 618611.
Thanks,
Blake.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 537320 [details] [diff] [review]
A patch to fix this
Setting approval flags... I'm not sure if we want this for 5.0 (it's not *that* noticeable), but maybe 6.0?
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird5.0?
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Checked in on trunk: http://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/174e92903cc2
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 7.0
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
Please remember to mark as fixed when something lands on trunk. Branches have their own flags.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 537320 [details] [diff] [review]
A patch to fix this
Too late for 5.0, but we'll take it for aurora/tb6.
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird5.0?
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: approval-thunderbird5.0-
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: approval-comm-aurora?
Attachment #537320 -
Flags: approval-comm-aurora+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
Checked in on aurora: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-aurora/rev/f293f6c073c2
status-thunderbird6:
--- → fixed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•