No description provided.
Assignee: nobody → ehsan
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #554210 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Comment on attachment 554210 [details] [diff] [review] Patch (v1) This should be fine, getting an additional review from Simon, though.
Any specific reason why we only add Urdu? A more complete list of languages that we might want to include: "ar", "arc", "dv", "fa", "he", "ks", "ps", "ug", "ur", "yi", "nqo" Maybe some of them occasionally use different scripts, but I think most of these would be useful at RTL. This way we are ready for users when they want to start localisation work.
(In reply to Friedel Wolff from comment #3) > Maybe some of them occasionally use different scripts, but I think most of > these would be useful at RTL. This way we are ready for users when they want > to start localisation work. That's why. We can add any new locales as RTL as soon as somebody decides to work on them, but I don't want to rush to that...
Attachment #554210 - Flags: review?(smontagu) → review+
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 9
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.