Closed
Bug 715258
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Favicons are of low quality for local/internal pages
Categories
(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect, P3)
Tracking
(firefox20 verified, blocking-fennec1.0 -, fennec19+)
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 20
People
(Reporter: padamczyk, Assigned: wesj)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files, 4 obsolete files)
Get / use high quality favicons for in-content UI: + Add-ons Manager + About: Firefox + About: Home ... etc.
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
We should be using a high quality version of the _Firefox_ icon here, rather than the "no favicon" favicon. We should also have a higher quality version of the no favicon favicon (the dotted box), of course.
Summary: Favicons are of low quality for → Favicons are of low quality for local/internal pages
Updated•13 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ibarlow
tracking-fennec: --- → 11+
Priority: -- → P3
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
Engineers: What format would you prefer? ico? png?
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ian Barlow (:ibarlow) from comment #2) > Engineers: What format would you prefer? ico? png? PNG
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Unassigning myself as this is ready for dev to pick up
Assignee: ibarlow → nobody
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Just a friendly ping to see if anyone was available to pick this up. Seeing a blank favicon in the start page header is not ideal.
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ian Barlow (:ibarlow) from comment #6) > Created attachment 592151 [details] > screenshot > > Just a friendly ping to see if anyone was available to pick this up. Seeing > a blank favicon in the start page header is not ideal. Blank favicons for internal pages is bug 709250
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) from comment #7) > (In reply to Ian Barlow (:ibarlow) from comment #6) > > Created attachment 592151 [details] > > screenshot > > > > Just a friendly ping to see if anyone was available to pick this up. Seeing > > a blank favicon in the start page header is not ideal. > > Blank favicons for internal pages is bug 709250 Meaning that even if we fixed this bug, we still couldn't see the favicons
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Soft blocking nom? Now that bug 709250 is knocked off, maybe we can revisit this
blocking-fennec1.0: --- → ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
I have these patches from bug 739215 that mfinkle hated there. This one uses high res favicons on internal pages (not the ones ibarlow put up here though...)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
This gives us the ability to specify a jar location for favicons for our default bookmarks. Makes it possible to remove some duplication we currently have.
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-fennec1.0: ? → soft
Updated•12 years ago
|
tracking-fennec: 11+ → 15+
blocking-fennec1.0: soft → -
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → wjohnston
Updated•12 years ago
|
tracking-fennec: 15+ → 17+
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Rolled up patches with new icons. I'm only including the 64x64 icons. Not sure if we need more or not (48x48 seems like overkill, 128x128?)
Attachment #613724 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #613725 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #667276 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 667276 [details] [diff] [review] Patch Why would we want to add two <link> to our HTML files? It seems like that would cause more data to be sent to Java than we care about. Wouldn't we always want to show the larger icon? Or am I missing something?
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Just me being correct. On LDPI devices, the 32x32 one is actually what we would probably want (but it looks like our current code just takes the last one in the file and uses its largest size?). If we ever fix that bug, these things would just work (correctly).
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Remove the 32x32 bits. I mentioned yesterday, but this also moves us to using: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/themes/winstripe/global/icons/blacklist_large.png for blocked pages, as opposed to: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/toolkit/themes/winstripe/global/icons/blacklist_favicon.png
Attachment #667276 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #667276 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Attachment #668078 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle)
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 668078 [details] [diff] [review] Patch >diff --git a/mobile/android/base/Makefile.in b/mobile/android/base/Makefile.in >-RESOURCES=$(RES_LAYOUT) $(RES_LAYOUT_LAND_V14) $(RES_LAYOUT_LARGE_V11) $(RES_LAYOUT_XLARGE_V11) $(RES_VALUES) $(RES_VALUES_LAND) $(RES_VALUES_V11) $(RES_VALUES_LARGE_V11) $(RES_VALUES_XLARGE_V11) $(RES_VALUES_LAND_V14) $(RES_XML) $(RES_ANIM) $(RES_DRAWABLE_NODPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_BASE) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LDPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_HDPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XHDPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_MDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_HDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XHDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_MDPI_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_HDPI_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_XHDPI_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LARGE_MDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LARGE_HDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LARGE_XHDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XLARGE_MDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XLARGE_HDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XLARGE_XHDPI_V11) $(RES_COLOR) $(RES_MENU) >+RESOURCES=$(RES_LAYOUT) $(RES_LAYOUT_LAND_V14) $(RES_LAYOUT_LARGE_V11) $(RES_LAYOUT_XLARGE_V11) $(RES_VALUES) $(RES_VALUES_LAND) $(RES_VALUES_V11) $(RES_VALUES_LARGE_V11) $(RES_VALUES_XLARGE_V11) $(RES_VALUES_LAND_V14) $(RES_VALUES_LARGE) $(RES_VALUES_XLARGE) $(RES_XML) $(RES_ANIM) $(RES_DRAWABLE_NODPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_BASE) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LDPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_HDPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XHDPI) $(RES_DRAWABLE_MDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_HDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XHDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_MDPI_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_HDPI_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LAND_XHDPI_V14) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LARGE_MDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LARGE_HDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_LARGE_XHDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XLARGE_MDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XLARGE_HDPI_V11) $(RES_DRAWABLE_XLARGE_XHDPI_V11) $(RES_COLOR) $(RES_MENU) You added values here, but I don't see them defined: $(RES_VALUES_LARGE) $(RES_VALUES_XLARGE) >diff --git a/mobile/android/branding/aurora/content/fennec_48x48.png b/mobile/android/branding/aurora/content/fennec_48x48.png >deleted file mode 100644 >Binary file mobile/android/branding/aurora/content/fennec_48x48.png has changed I don't think you want to delete fennec_48x48.png from aurora branding Let me know if these changes are needed
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
Not needed. I'll throw up a new patch.
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 668078 [details] [diff] [review] Patch Waiting for new patch
Attachment #668078 -
Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review-
Updated•12 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(wjohnston)
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
Wes, ping again.
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
I am updating the patch with my comments.
Updated•12 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(wjohnston)
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
I updated Wes' patch with the two changes I requested and unbitrotted. Tested and it seems to work as expected.
Attachment #668078 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #692167 -
Flags: review+
Comment 24•12 years ago
|
||
Backed out for breaking robocop & troboprovider: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Inbound&jobname=robo&rev=042b44652822 https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/b1fb4089fa9b
Comment 25•12 years ago
|
||
Fixed test breakage: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=6e8d4a279a35 https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/6fb67e58bad6
Comment 26•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6fb67e58bad6
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 20
Comment 27•12 years ago
|
||
Firefox 20.0a1 (2012-12-17) Device: Galaxy Nexus OS: Android 4.1.1 The favicons has proper quality and are displayed in Nightly (Fx 20) for pages like about:home, about:firefox, about:addons Marking bug as VERIFIED FIXED.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
status-firefox20:
--- → verified
Updated•3 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•