Closed
Bug 757039
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Handle non-uniform scales when doing device space blurs
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla15
People
(Reporter: jrmuizel, Assigned: jrmuizel)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa-])
Attachments
(1 file)
3.71 KB,
patch
|
roc
:
review+
blassey
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The Java screenshoting code draws pages at non-uniform scales. It's not much work to handle these so let's do it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #625639 -
Flags: review?(roc)
Attachment #625639 -
Flags: review?(roc) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/dc8bae2d72e7
Assignee: nobody → jmuizelaar
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla15
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dc8bae2d72e7
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 625639 [details] [diff] [review] Handle non-uniform scales when doing device space blurs [Approval Request Comment] User impact if declined: Very slow box-shadow in java screenshotting code and potential OOM. This is needed to make nonnompaelo.com usable. Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): been on m-c for a while Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Some risk because it impacts desktop as well as mobile. Passes all our tests String or UUID changes made by this patch: None
Attachment #625639 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jeff Muizelaar [:jrmuizel] from comment #5) > Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Some risk because it > impacts desktop as well as mobile. Passes all our tests How should we be on the lookout for regressions here (both mobile and desktop) if approved?
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
rather, the question should be "where" can we expect to find regressions if they do occur?
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #7) > rather, the question should be "where" can we expect to find regressions if > they do occur? Shadow drawing
![]() |
||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 625639 [details] [diff] [review] Handle non-uniform scales when doing device space blurs This caused a regression: bug 759457.
Attachment #625639 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 625639 [details] [diff] [review] Handle non-uniform scales when doing device space blurs Rerequesting aurora approval now that the regression fix has landed on inbound.
Attachment #625639 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Dupe bug 753028 was marked as blocking-fennec1.0+, so setting it to ? here (I don't have access to + for some reason). Given the regression we found previously, let's give this some more bake time on m-c.
blocking-fennec1.0: --- → ?
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 625639 [details] [diff] [review] Handle non-uniform scales when doing device space blurs [Triage Comment] approval to land on where ever 14 is now
Attachment #625639 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
We're opportunistically taking this, but we wouldn't block on it.
blocking-fennec1.0: ? → soft
Comment 14•11 years ago
|
||
Ah, turns out this is already on beta: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/74f5e0d677f2
status-firefox14:
--- → fixed
status-firefox15:
--- → fixed
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [qa-]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•