Closed
Bug 796989
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Memory leak in TB 15 (2GB) in safe mode
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: jberkus, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: memory-leak, regression, Whiteboard: [regression:TB15?][on Mac])
Thunderbird 15 (on Mac) apparently has a creeping memory leak. This includes 15.0.1, which did not cause any change in behavior in this regard. 1. I have multiple accounts with thousands of emails. This means that on startup TB needs about 250MB. 2. I tend to leave TB on all the time. 3. Over the course of 16-24 hours, TB will gradually use more and more memory on the Mac. 4. Eventually it peaks at around 1.8GB real, 6GB virtual on a laptop with 2GB RAM. 5. At that point, the system becomes unresponsive and TB needs to be killed. Note that I did not observe this issue with 14.0.
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Can you install the gecko profiler extension and submit a repoprt so we can analyse what's going on ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Sure, link?
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Unfortunately the profiler doesn't work on 15.x; it's only supported on 16.x and forward. Best results would be if you could reproduce using a Nightly build, but failing that you could test Beta. The profiler extension is available in the Add-Ons library; go to Tools / Add-ons / Get Add-ons and search for "Gecko Profiler" Also, if you could check Help / Troubleshooting Information / about:memory to see if it identifies what sort of memory is leaking.
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
see also http://mikeconley.ca/blog/2012/06/15/gecko-profiler-now-works-in-thunderbird-daily/ I have maybe 3 people reporting memory issues in the past month. But not been able to narrow it down. And in one case for a startup issue a msgdb log revealed no databases causing the high memory I agree with irving, using daily build or aurora would be a plus.
Severity: normal → major
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
beta and aurora listed at http://www.mozilla.org/thunderbird/channel/
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
linux reports http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2543045 http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=2548781 bug 793792 bug 791581 windows reports https://getsatisfaction.com/mozilla_messaging/topics/thunderbird_15_0_1_memory_usage_leakage bug 795590 is windows, but doesn't seem the same class as this bug. plus several reports have been sourced to lightning and google contacts.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Here's about:memory after several hours of running, and apparently memory leak up to 800MB: Main Process Explicit Allocations 608.09 MB (100.0%) -- explicit ├──446.09 MB (73.36%) ── heap-unclassified ├───87.66 MB (14.41%) -- js │ ├──61.43 MB (10.10%) ++ (298 tiny) │ ├──19.25 MB (03.16%) -- compartment([System Principal], about:blank) │ │ ├──11.37 MB (01.87%) ++ gc-heap │ │ └───7.87 MB (01.29%) ++ (9 tiny) │ └───6.98 MB (01.15%) ++ runtime ├───31.54 MB (05.19%) -- storage │ ├──31.53 MB (05.19%) -- sqlite │ │ ├──24.30 MB (04.00%) -- global-messages-db.sqlite │ │ │ ├──24.17 MB (03.97%) ── cache-used │ │ │ └───0.13 MB (00.02%) ++ (2 tiny) │ │ └───7.24 MB (01.19%) ++ (11 tiny) │ └───0.00 MB (00.00%) ── prefixset/all ├───18.09 MB (02.97%) -- window-objects │ ├──11.87 MB (01.95%) ++ (17 tiny) │ └───6.22 MB (01.02%) ++ top(chrome://messenger/content/messenger.xul, id=61)/active ├───13.89 MB (02.28%) -- dom/workers() │ ├───6.95 MB (01.14%) ++ worker(resource:///modules/attachmentChecker.js, 0x14fc07800) │ ├───6.95 MB (01.14%) ++ worker(resource:///modules/attachmentChecker.js, 0x167528000) │ └───0.00 MB (00.00%) ++ (3 tiny) └───10.83 MB (01.78%) ++ (10 tiny) Other Measurements 0.00 MB ── canvas-2d-pixel-bytes 627.11 MB ── explicit 0.59 MB ── gfx-surface-image 0 ── ghost-windows 534.98 MB ── heap-allocated 551.03 MB ── heap-committed 15.90 MB ── heap-committed-unused 2.97% ── heap-committed-unused-ratio 2.79 MB ── heap-dirty 218.88 MB ── heap-unused 0.00 MB ── images-content-used-uncompressed 331 ── js-compartments-system 14 ── js-compartments-user 54.00 MB ── js-gc-heap 2.13 MB ── js-main-runtime-analysis-temporary 28.09 MB ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-allocated 23.35 MB ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-arena-unused 0.00 MB ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-chunk-clean-unused 0.00 MB ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-chunk-dirty-unused 51.44 MB ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-committed 23.35 MB ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-committed-unused 83.13% ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-committed-unused-ratio 2.56 MB ── js-main-runtime-gc-heap-decommitted 0.34 MB ── js-main-runtime-mjit 12.36 MB ── js-main-runtime-objects 14.00 MB ── js-main-runtime-scripts 14.58 MB ── js-main-runtime-shapes 4.36 MB ── js-main-runtime-strings 0.50 MB ── js-main-runtime-type-inference 9,051 ── page-faults-hard 3,095,080 ── page-faults-soft 587.05 MB ── resident 31.53 MB ── storage-sqlite 4,262.83 MB ── vsize 2.43 MB ── window-objects-dom 5.42 MB ── window-objects-layout-arenas 0.22 MB ── window-objects-layout-pres-contexts 4.56 MB ── window-objects-layout-style-sets 0.03 MB ── window-objects-layout-text-runs 5.42 MB ── window-objects-style-sheets
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
This is my work desktop, so I don't feel that comfortable running it on aurora. Therefore I'll try reverting to 14.0 next, instead. Note that this will take a while, because my profile is quite large, so don't expect to see anything from me for a few days.
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
I don't understand what will take a while. You know you don't have to redownloaded messages, right?
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
my profile is ~~ 8GB, and I don't have the space to spare on this laptop, so I need to find a drive with space on it.
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Josh, thanks for the about:memory (and sorry about the crash from leaving about:memory open; did that send in a crash report? If so, can you follow up with the link from Help / Troubleshooting / about:crashes?) What type of accounts are you using? Is most of your mail in POP or local folders, or is it in IMAP? If IMAP, do you have offline use enabled?
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
I've never once had TB fire breakpad on this machine. I've discussed before that breakpad-for-TB-on-mac doesn't seem to work. And IMAP with offline use enabled, correct. Hence the huge profile storage size.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
BTW, I'm "jberkus" on irc.mozilla.org
Reporter | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Wayne, I've upgraded to 16.0.2. Let me make sure the memory leak is still happening.
Flags: needinfo?(josh)
Reporter | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
Hmmm. Ok, leak is still there but it's slower. I left Thunderbird running for 3 days. over that time, memory usage crept up from: 390MB real, 396MB virtual to: 1.53GB real, 2.07GB virtual. I'll proceed with taking memory profiler data both before and after memory bloat. Note that I'm rather an extreme case; I have four active IMAP accounts, with 50+ folders total, and receive ~~ 300 emails/day. OSS developer, what can I tell you? Is attempting to downgrade to 14.0 still a worthwhile test excercise as well?
Reporter | ||
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Wayne, I've installed the profiler, but I have no idea where the results file is, and the profiler docs don't say. Hint?
Reporter | ||
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
Wayne, Ignore the last question. I found the profiler, did "Upload Full Profile", but now I have no idea where the profile is so that I can link you to it.
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
Mike ?
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to [:jberkus] Josh Berkus from comment #19) > Wayne, > > Ignore the last question. I found the profiler, did "Upload Full Profile", > but now I have no idea where the profile is so that I can link you to it. After you upload the profile, just below the "Share" heading and above the "Upload Full Profile" button you should see the line "Success! Use this link"; the word "link" is a hyperlink to the URL where the profile was uploaded.
Reporter | ||
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
Nope. Tried it 3 times, no link.
Comment 23•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to [:jberkus] Josh Berkus from comment #22) > Nope. Tried it 3 times, no link. Which version of the add-on is this?
Reporter | ||
Comment 24•12 years ago
|
||
I have no way to tell. However, I downloaded it last week.
Comment 25•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to [:jberkus] Josh Berkus from comment #24) > I have no way to tell. > > However, I downloaded it last week. If you go into your Add-ons Manager, it should tell you what version of the profiler that you're running.
Reporter | ||
Comment 26•12 years ago
|
||
Ah, I see. It's an Extension, not an Add-on. 0.9.8
Reporter | ||
Comment 27•12 years ago
|
||
Feh, sorry: 1.9.8
Comment 28•12 years ago
|
||
Strange. I have the same version of the add-on, and I'm able to upload a profile using the following steps on Windows 7: http://i.imgur.com/doN7F.png
Reporter | ||
Comment 29•12 years ago
|
||
So, here's a "before" profile. What I did to get it was: Shut down TB. Restarted TB after a few minutes. Enabled the profiler. Waited 3 minutes. Uploaded a profile. http://people.mozilla.com/~bgirard/cleopatra/?1352403914629#report=09b1eeaec8f90e37d76471d262172d9df28301ce Note that having the profiler running make TB eat memory much faster than it did without the profiler running; it went from ~~400MB to 670MB in just the 10 minutes it was running with the profiler on. Normally, it would take a few hours to build up to that amount of RAM. Tommorrow, I will take a profile after TB has been running for 24 hours.
Comment 30•12 years ago
|
||
So, looking at this bug a bit closer, I don't think the Gecko Profiler is going to help us here. The Gecko Profiler allows us to visualize and drill into performance problems caused by inefficient code / patterns. In particular, it helps us to see where Thunderbird is spending most of its time while it r uns. It's not really designed to help us drill into what is allocating memory and not de-allocating it. We might have other tools for this, but again, I don't think the Gecko Profiler is what we want to use to solve this particular problem.
Comment 31•12 years ago
|
||
jberkus, does this memory loss occur if you start thunderbird in safe mode?
Summary: Memory leak in TB 15 → Memory leak in TB 15 (2GB)
Whiteboard: [regression:TB15][needs profile]
Reporter | ||
Comment 32•12 years ago
|
||
I'll try to find out. I need to run TB for 24-36 hours to really see the leak, so be patient.
Comment 33•11 years ago
|
||
Josh ?
Reporter | ||
Comment 34•11 years ago
|
||
Ludovic, Sorry, holidays, you know? Will try running it now.
Reporter | ||
Comment 35•11 years ago
|
||
Ludovic, OK, this looks like it's not an add-on issue. Twice I ran Thunderbird for 24 hours with add-ons disabled (via Help-->restart with add-ons disabled). In both cases, Real Mem for Thunderbird went up by 450MB over the course of 24 hours, from ~~ 400mb to ~~ 850MB (according to top, 660MB of that is pinned and not virtual). This is consistent with the leakage rate I've been seeing since 16.0 (which was half the leakage rate of 15.0). This is currently 17.0.1. NOTE: I am shortly going to deprecate my Mac in favor of a new, Linux laptop. As such, I won't be doing anything on TB for Mac except to follow-up on existing bugs.
Comment 36•11 years ago
|
||
Josh, obtain a log so we can see if folders are being closed. see https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging#Environment_Variables_to_set and use msgdb:1 attach log to bug or email to one of us, and comment in the bug please
Flags: needinfo?(josh)
Whiteboard: [regression:TB15][needs profile] → [closeme 2013-02-28][regression:TB15]
Comment 37•11 years ago
|
||
Josh, if you ever get a crash that doesn't fire breakpad, please file a bug and make it block meta bug 482756. Did you ever get TB14 fired up to see if it reproduces there?
Summary: Memory leak in TB 15 (2GB) → Memory leak in TB 15 (2GB) in safe mode
Reporter | ||
Comment 38•11 years ago
|
||
Wayne, Sorry, I didn't know that we still wanted to try reverting me to TB14. I thought that approach had been dropped. Note that I am no longer using the MacBook as my work machine, per comments above -- I've moved back to Linux, where I don't see the memory leak issue. So I'd need to set up a test where I leave the macbook running with TB on for a couple days, which I can do once I get it back from my wife. Note that this issue has never crashed TB. It just eventually eats all the RAM on the system, which then has to be hard rebooted.
Flags: needinfo?(josh)
Comment 39•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to [:jberkus] Josh Berkus from comment #38) > Wayne, > > Sorry, I didn't know that we still wanted to try reverting me to TB14. I > thought that approach had been dropped. It is sometimes useful to (re)confirm - sometimes we find interesting things :) If it indeed started in TB15, then, it will help to narrow the regression range to where it started in the TB15 development cycle. I'd start by testing TB15.0b1 at https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/releases/ If b1 does NOT fail, then try b3. If b3 doesn't fail try b2. If b3 does not fail, try b4 > So I'd need to set up a test where I leave the macbook running with TB on > for a couple days, which I can do once I get it back from my wife. to save us some time, please get a msgdb:5 log in your next testings of TB17 and TB14. details at https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging
Whiteboard: [closeme 2013-02-28][regression:TB15] → [closeme 2013-02-28][regression:TB15?]
Whiteboard: [closeme 2013-02-28][regression:TB15?] → [regression:TB15?]
Reporter | ||
Comment 40•11 years ago
|
||
Wayne, As it turns out, I'm seeing a memory leak on Linux too. So I'm in a better position to test this now.
Comment 41•11 years ago
|
||
Josh, you could test http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/try-builds/archaeopteryx@coole-files.de-a63ca6826d5a/ which has a memory related fix, and report your results
Comment 42•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #41) > Josh, you could test > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/thunderbird/try-builds/ > archaeopteryx@coole-files.de-a63ca6826d5a/ which has a memory related fix, > and report your results
Flags: needinfo?(josh)
Comment 43•11 years ago
|
||
If you still have the Mac we'd be interested in an update (until then, closing incomplete)... using version 24 Earlybird from http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/channel/ Please see https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Logging and turn on msgdb:1,timestamp log setting - attach msgdb log file - help | troubleshooting information - attach file with results from help | troubleshooting | about:memory | measure and save
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Whiteboard: [regression:TB15?] → [regression:TB15?][on Mac]
Reporter | ||
Comment 44•11 years ago
|
||
Understood. I just haven't had time to follow-up on this and retest. I'll reopen it if I can repro the issue and collect all data requested.
Flags: needinfo?(josh)
Comment 45•11 years ago
|
||
I am running TB24 now and I started seeing this issue. Within 24 hours its killing my 12GB of RAM, half of which is typically free, so, TB is eating north of 5GB real memory. Earlier with TB17, I did not have system come down like this, although I have seen it eat upto 1.5GB of real (RES in Linux 'top') RAM after few days of uptime. Is anybody making any effort in resolving this? Has any developer tried to valgrind the thing? Something drastically changed in 24 compared to 17.
Comment 46•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sunil from comment #45) > I am running TB24 now and I started seeing this issue. Within 24 hours its > killing my 12GB of RAM, half of which is typically free, so, TB is eating > north of 5GB real memory. Earlier with TB17, I did not have system come down > like this, although I have seen it eat upto 1.5GB of real (RES in Linux > 'top') RAM after few days of uptime. Sunil, a disproportionate number of linux users report memory usage issues (as compared to windows users) and they almost always end up not being caused by Thunderbird. If you see this problem when thunderbird is started in safe mode, then please make a new report, but be prepared to answer many questions.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•