Closed
Bug 815680
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Elm branch should use the whole pool of Win64 builders rather than a subset
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Assigned: armenzg)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files, 1 obsolete file)
1.33 KB,
patch
|
coop
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
3.38 KB,
patch
|
coop
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.49 KB,
patch
|
coop
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
713 bytes,
patch
|
catlee
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Once we use the whole pool again we should take the subset of slaves and re-image them like the rest of the pool.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Depends on: enable-8.0sdk
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
After speaking with dustin, we will push the re-imaging of the custom builders later on as we don't currently have a Windows guy.
For now, we will add post-imaging steps for win64 slaves:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/How_To/Set_Up_a_Freshly_Imaged_Slave#Windows_2008_64-bit_.28MDT_.26_unmanaged.29
which leads to:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReferencePlatforms/Win64#Post-reimaging_steps
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #688003 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #688004 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 688003 [details] [diff] [review]
remove win64-metro platform
wrong patch
Attachment #688003 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #688003 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #688024 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Blocks: metro-releng
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
No longer depends on: enable-8.0sdk
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #688004 -
Flags: review?(coop) → review+
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 688024 [details] [diff] [review]
remove win64-metro platform
Review of attachment 688024 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r+ with the nit fixed.
::: mozilla/production_config.py
@@ -12,1 @@
> MOCK_DL120G7 = ['bld-centos6-hp-%03d' % x for x in range(6,24)] # 5 staging, 17 prod, 17 try
Shouldn't we remove the WIN64_METRO definition from line 11 also?
Attachment #688024 -
Flags: review?(coop) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #688024 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
We're getting some exception on the elm builders, wondering if this checkin might be the cause?
remoteFailed: [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames): <class 'twisted.spread.pb.PBConnectionLost'>: [Failure instance: Traceback (failure with no frames): <class 'twisted.internet.error.ConnectionDone'>: Connection was closed cleanly.
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?noignore=0&tree=Elm
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
The slaves that took the jobs where the known ones:
WIN64_METRO = ['w64-ix-slave%02i' % x for x in [11,20,42,43]]
Unfortunately without this patch those 5 slaves would get the jobs assigned but in reality they had no master to talk to.
They were living dead; caught between two realms.
I will shut them down until this patch makes it into production.
Attachment #689303 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 689303 [details] [diff] [review]
fix list of slaves
Review of attachment 689303 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hrmmm, didn't I suggest this already with the previous patch in comment #6?
Attachment #689303 -
Flags: review?(coop) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 689303 [details] [diff] [review]
fix list of slaves
I completely missed it :S
Attachment #689303 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #688004 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
Attachment #689723 -
Flags: review?(catlee)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #689723 -
Flags: review?(catlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #689723 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•