819357 - Please re-image the following win64 slaves

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Infrastructure & Operations :: RelOps: General, task)

Description

[Armen [:armenzg]]

They have gone through lots of hand modifications for the Elm branch.
I would like them to have a new beginning.

w64-ix-slave11
w64-ix-slave20
w64-ix-slave42
w64-ix-slave43

Thanks a lot!

Comment 1

[Amy Rich [:arr] [:arich]]

I'll work on these today.

Comment 2

[Amy Rich [:arr] [:arich]]

20 and 42 have been reinstalled.  11 and 34 are waiting on a power cycle in the blocker bug.

Comment 3

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

Don't use 20 and 42 yet - they seem to have the Win 8 SDK installed (despite disabling that step)

Comment 4

[Armen [:armenzg]]

I assume those are the old steps that MaRu had for the old sdk (prior Nov. 15th).

We assume the builders will come without the SDK and then install them by hand:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReferencePlatforms/Win64#Post-reimaging_steps

Comment 5

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

Yes, it was a work-in-progress he did.  I had hoped to experiment with installing it the "right" way today, but things are not going quickly..

Comment 6

[Armen [:armenzg]]

FTR, this is not an urgent request since we have enough win64 capacity.

Comment 7

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

So, I
 * disabled the "Install Windows SDK 8.0" step in the task sequence
 * updated the deployment share
 * installed from WDS

and in the end, it looks like the SDK is installed anyway:

 Directory of c:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\8.0

12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          .
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          ..
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          bin
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          build
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          Catalogs
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          Debuggers
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          DesignTime
12/07/2012  01:38 PM    <DIR>          Include
12/07/2012  01:38 PM    <DIR>          Lib
12/07/2012  01:38 PM    <DIR>          Redist
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          References
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          Remote
06/27/2012  07:06 PM               330 SDKManifest.xml
07/02/2012  07:00 PM            61,548 sdk_license.rtf
06/27/2012  07:06 PM            62,297 sdk_third_party_notices.rtf
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          Shortcuts
12/07/2012  01:39 PM    <DIR>          Windows Performance Toolkit
               3 File(s)        124,175 bytes
              14 Dir(s)  36,917,960,704 bytes free

c:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\8.0>

Comment 8

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

Chris, this was where I was seeing the TS step run despite being disabled.  I'm sure I'm doing something wrong -- maybe some other step is installing it too?

Comment 9

[Armen [:armenzg]]

What is the status on this? where can I help?

Comment 10

[Armen [:armenzg]]

FTR, the drive should be E: rather than D:

Comment 11

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

Last I heard, these weren't a capacity problem at the moment, so I'm saving these for Chris's help with when he's back online.  I just heard that's next Monday, not today as I misunderstood.

Comment 12

[Armen [:armenzg]]

Thanks for the info. WFM.

Comment 13

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

All four have been reimaged.

Comment 14

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Dustin:
is "No module named buildslave.bat" expected on these?

Comment 15

[Dustin J. Mitchell [:dustin] (he/him)]

Nope.  Looks like that happens after slavealloc, so it didn't appear until you enabled.

That's no fun, because the task sequences don't change that :(

Comment 16

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=820992#c6

Not sure how this is installed normally.

Comment 17

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

These were perma-red this morning; I've taken my master down to do other build testing.  The slaves are currently disabled in slavealloc.

Comment 18

[Kim Moir [:kmoir] ET]

Staging tests were successful, back in production.