Closed
Bug 816524
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Do not store information about closed private windows
Categories
(Firefox :: Session Restore, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 20
People
(Reporter: ehsan.akhgari, Assigned: andreshm)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [appcoast])
Attachments
(1 file)
1.44 KB,
patch
|
ttaubert
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Providing the ability to undo closed tabs in private windows is fine, but providing the ability to reopen closed windows seems risky, since by pressing Cmd+Shift+N, the user can see what the previous user was browsing, and we also show this information in the History menu. So, we should not keep any information about the closed private windows.
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Do we want the ability to reopen closed private windows while other private windows are open?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #1)
> Do we want the ability to reopen closed private windows while other private
> windows are open?
No, I don't think so. We don't want to support reopening some of the times and not the others.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → andres
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
With this patch, the browser_394759_privatebrowsing.js test fails. However, it should be migrated, since is based in the global PB. Is there a bug for that?
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/sessionstore/test/browser_394759_privatebrowsing.js
Attachment #687271 -
Flags: review?(ehsan)
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Andres Hernandez [:andreshm] from comment #3)
> Created attachment 687271 [details] [diff] [review]
> Patch v1
>
> With this patch, the browser_394759_privatebrowsing.js test fails. However,
> it should be migrated, since is based in the global PB. Is there a bug for
> that?
>
> http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/components/
> sessionstore/test/browser_394759_privatebrowsing.js
No, can you please do that here, so that when we land this patch the test passes? Thanks!
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 687271 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v1
LGTM, but I'd like Tim to look at it.
Attachment #687271 -
Flags: review?(ehsan) → review?(ttaubert)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #687271 -
Flags: review?(ttaubert) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
On the second thought, I'd like to land this sooner in order for it to go into the hands of our testers sooner.
I filed bug 817472 about the test in question. Since this patch will turn Birch orange, I'd appreciate if you can please prioritize that test, Andres. Thanks!
Depends on: 817472
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 20
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
This change caused many sessionstore failures on birch; ehsan, it should perhaps be backed out.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/077e43a8668b
Backed out. We should be able to get birch green, and then it will be easier to catch similar failures in the future.
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #9)
> https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/077e43a8668b
>
> Backed out. We should be able to get birch green, and then it will be easier to
> catch similar failures in the future.
Thanks, Josh, I concur.
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago → 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•