Closed
Bug 864741
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
After we disable talos jobs (partially) on Fedora minis we should re-purpose some of them
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: CIDuty, task, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: armenzg, Assigned: armenzg)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [re-js][re-nad-20130501])
Attachments
(10 files)
1.28 KB,
patch
|
Callek
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.85 KB,
patch
|
Callek
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
961 bytes,
patch
|
rail
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
867 bytes,
patch
|
Callek
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
578 bytes,
patch
|
Callek
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
544 bytes,
patch
|
rail
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
699 bytes,
patch
|
rail
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
787 bytes,
patch
|
rail
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.25 KB,
patch
|
rail
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.59 KB,
patch
|
rail
:
review+
armenzg
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
In bug 863903 we're disabling talos on FF23 based project branches.
After a couple of days I will be able to determine how many we can re-purpose.
This bug is to track the work after that bug.
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Summary: After we disable talos jobs (partially) on Fedora minis we should re-purpose them → After we disable talos jobs (partially) on Fedora minis we should re-purpose some of them
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → armenzg
update: next action date: 2013-05-01
- 04-25 - fedora talos jobs are expected to be disabled today (Apr 25).
- 05-01 - we'll be in a position to identify the number of machines to be reimaged. Likely in the 30 machine range.
Whiteboard: [re-js] → [re-js][re-nad-20130501]
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
We disabled talos jobs late in the day yesterday (2013-04-25 18:56:31 PDT) so the wait time numbers for yesterday do not help. [1]
Nevertheless, if I tweak this URL I can see how we did in the last 12 hours [2]:
https://secure.pub.build.mozilla.org/buildapi/reports/waittimes/testpool?starttime=1366938000&endtime=1366992000
and I can compare to the same time period for a day before: [3]
https://secure.pub.build.mozilla.org/buildapi/reports/waittimes/testpool?starttime=1366851600&endtime=1366905600
I'm going to disable 15 of our fed64 machines and 15 of the fed32 machines and see on Monday how we do today.
talos-r3-fed-001
-> 002 is loaned
talos-r3-fed-003
talos-r3-fed-004
talos-r3-fed-005
talos-r3-fed-006
talos-r3-fed-007
talos-r3-fed-008
talos-r3-fed-009
talos-r3-fed-010
talos-r3-fed-011
talos-r3-fed-012
talos-r3-fed-013
talos-r3-fed-014
talos-r3-fed-015
talos-r3-fed-016
talos-r3-fed64-031
talos-r3-fed64-032
talos-r3-fed64-033
talos-r3-fed64-034
--> not existent
talos-r3-fed64-036
talos-r3-fed64-037
talos-r3-fed64-038
talos-r3-fed64-039
talos-r3-fed64-040
talos-r3-fed64-041
talos-r3-fed64-042
talos-r3-fed64-043
talos-r3-fed64-044
talos-r3-fed64-045
talos-r3-fed64-046
[1]
fedora: 3592
0: 3464 96.44%
15: 92 2.56%
30: 35 0.97%
45: 1 0.03%
fedora64: 874
0: 857 98.05%
15: 17 1.95%
#####################################
[2]
fedora: 1297
0 1297 100.00%
fedora64: 291
0 291 100.00%
#####################################
[3]
fedora: 1789
0 1789 100.00%
fedora64: 622
0 617 99.20%
15 4 0.64%
30 1 0.16%
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
I removed too many from each pool :(
I will put 10 machines back for each pool.
Friday's wait times:
####################
fedora: 3814 86.37%
fedora64: 1001 54.65%
The list for now will be this (I've added a new machine talos-r3-fed-002):
| talos-r3-fed-001 |
| talos-r3-fed-002 |
| talos-r3-fed-003 |
| talos-r3-fed-004 |
| talos-r3-fed-005 |
| talos-r3-fed64-031 |
| talos-r3-fed64-032 |
| talos-r3-fed64-033 |
| talos-r3-fed64-034 |
| talos-r3-fed64-036 |
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #743093 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #743094 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #743095 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #743096 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743093 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743094 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743095 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743096 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
I forgot this patch.
Attachment #743166 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek)
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 743166 [details] [diff] [review]
[opsi] add winxp machines
Because I like you I'll let you land this, but I will never admit to reviewing an opsi patch, ever.
Attachment #743166 -
Flags: review?(bugspam.Callek) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743093 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743094 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743095 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743096 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #743166 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Today we had better wait times (we didn't have as high of a load though - only 42K jobs).
I will disable another 5 from each and see how we do tomorrow.
mysql> select name from slaves where notes like '%864741%' and envid=2 order by name;
+--------------------+
| name |
+--------------------+
| talos-r3-fed-006 |
| talos-r3-fed-007 |
| talos-r3-fed-008 |
| talos-r3-fed-009 |
| talos-r3-fed-010 |
| talos-r3-fed64-037 |
| talos-r3-fed64-038 |
| talos-r3-fed64-039 |
| talos-r3-fed64-040 |
| talos-r3-fed64-041 |
+--------------------+
10 rows in set (0.11 sec)
Monday's wait times:
####################
fedora: 3346 - 99.13%
fedora64: 857 - 98.95%
Friday's wait times:
####################
fedora: 3814 86.37%
fedora64: 1001 54.65%
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
The following WinXP machines have been added to the production pool:
talos-r3-xp-128
talos-r3-xp-129
--
talos-r3-xp-131
Waiting on imaging for the remaining ones.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
I'm putting 3 fed64 machines back so we won't score so lowly on a high load day.
We won't hit perfect with 3 more but we're OK to have better XP wait times than Fed64 as the end-to-end times are worst on Windows.
This means that I will request 7 more machines to be re-imaged:
| talos-r3-fed-006 |
| talos-r3-fed-007 |
| talos-r3-fed-008 |
| talos-r3-fed-009 |
| talos-r3-fed-010 |
| talos-r3-fed64-037 |
| talos-r3-fed64-038 |
| talos-r3-fed64-039 |
Tuesday's wait times (-10 machines):
####################################
Total jobs: 49k
fedora: 3883 - 93.79%
fedora64: 1112 - 76.35%
Monday's wait times (-5 machines):
##################################
Total jobs: 42k
fedora: 3346 - 99.13%
fedora64: 857 - 98.95%
Friday's wait times (-15 machines):
###################################
Total jobs: 39k
fedora: 3814 86.37%
fedora64: 1001 54.65%
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #745180 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #745181 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #745183 -
Flags: review?
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745182 -
Flags: review?
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745183 -
Flags: review? → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745182 -
Flags: review? → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745186 -
Flags: review?(rail) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745181 -
Flags: review? → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745180 -
Flags: review? → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745180 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745181 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745182 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745183 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #745186 -
Flags: checked-in+
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
In production.
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
All the machines that have been set aside have been re-imaged.
WinXP wait times are in the 90+% close to 95%.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
Product: mozilla.org → Release Engineering
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Release Engineering → Infrastructure & Operations
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•