Closed
Bug 865246
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Implement the processing for BiquadFilterNode
Categories
(Core :: Web Audio, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla23
People
(Reporter: ehsan.akhgari, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)
References
Details
Attachments
(5 files, 1 obsolete file)
24.17 KB,
patch
|
padenot
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
15.59 KB,
patch
|
padenot
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
1.69 KB,
patch
|
padenot
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
3.38 KB,
patch
|
padenot
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
11.27 KB,
patch
|
padenot
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #742596 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #742598 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #742599 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #742600 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
Demo/testcase: http://people.mozilla.org/~eakhgari/webaudio/biquad.html
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
(Forgot to introduce mDetune to the cycle collector)
Attachment #742598 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #742598 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Attachment #742755 -
Flags: review?(paul)
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #742592 -
Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #742596 -
Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #742755 -
Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #742599 -
Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #742600 -
Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
I'm wondering how to test this in a meaningful manner. I'm thinking about a number of generated sines, with biquads set in a way that the RMS level of the output would be well known, considering the filter frequency and slope.
Actually, we can test this node using the AnalyserNode, but first, we need to write tests for the AnalyserNode. Something based on generated sines would do the job, I guess, but I'm going to talk to people who know this stuff to make sure.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•12 years ago
|
||
Sounds good, please file a bug once you come up with a testing plan for either of these nodes. :-)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/752f587eeddc
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/d173019355d0
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/e6327ce28b30
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/eb46dc93b5e0
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/35360afebda3
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/752f587eeddc
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d173019355d0
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e6327ce28b30
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/eb46dc93b5e0
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/35360afebda3
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla23
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
Mass moving Web Audio bugs to the Web Audio component. Filter on duckityduck.
Component: Video/Audio → Web Audio
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•