Implement the processing for BiquadFilterNode

RESOLVED FIXED in mozilla23

Status

()

defect
RESOLVED FIXED
6 years ago
6 years ago

People

(Reporter: Ehsan, Assigned: Ehsan)

Tracking

Trunk
mozilla23
x86
macOS
Points:
---
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(5 attachments, 1 obsolete attachment)

Assignee

Description

6 years ago
No description provided.
Assignee

Comment 1

6 years ago
Assignee: nobody → ehsan
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #742592 - Flags: review?(paul)
Assignee

Updated

6 years ago
Blocks: 866442
Assignee

Comment 7

6 years ago
(Forgot to introduce mDetune to the cycle collector)
Attachment #742598 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #742598 - Flags: review?(paul)
Attachment #742755 - Flags: review?(paul)
Attachment #742592 - Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Attachment #742596 - Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Attachment #742755 - Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Attachment #742599 - Flags: review?(paul) → review+
Attachment #742600 - Flags: review?(paul) → review+
I'm wondering how to test this in a meaningful manner. I'm thinking about a number of generated sines, with biquads set in a way that the RMS level of the output would be well known, considering the filter frequency and slope.

Actually, we can test this node using the AnalyserNode, but first, we need to write tests for the AnalyserNode. Something based on generated sines would do the job, I guess, but I'm going to talk to people who know this stuff to make sure.
Assignee

Comment 9

6 years ago
Sounds good, please file a bug once you come up with a testing plan for either of these nodes.  :-)
Assignee

Comment 12

6 years ago
Mass moving Web Audio bugs to the Web Audio component.  Filter on duckityduck.
Component: Video/Audio → Web Audio
Blocks: 924286
Blocks: 924288
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.