Closed
Bug 891185
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
[socorro-bixie] Build Development Environment
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: WebOps: Socorro, task, P1)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
People
(Reporter: bburton, Assigned: bburton)
References
Details
From email
>> For testing Bixie we will need a home for the bixie-collector, bixie-processor, bixie-crontabber, bixie-crashmover, bixie-middleware, bixie-webapp(django). We also need access to RabbitMQ, Postgres, HBase, and ElasticSearch. Existing HBase and RabbitMQ can be reused.
>> I haven't spoken to Adrian, but I'm reasonably sure that existing ES can be used. Selena is nervous about disk space and wants a clone of our staging DB setup before we put the bixie infra under any regular load.
DEV:
1 host
* same netflows to RabbitMQ, Postgres, Hbase, and ES as on socorro-dev)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
:lonnen, :laura, I find three physical boxes in inventory named socorro-queuey[1-3].stage.webapp.phx1.mozilla.com that are marked as "building", was there still plans to use queuey?
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
rhelmer was dealing with queuey, let's ask him. But I don't think so.
Flags: needinfo?(rhelmer)
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Laura Thomson :laura from comment #2)
> rhelmer was dealing with queuey, let's ask him. But I don't think so.
(In reply to Brandon Burton [:solarce] from comment #1)
> :lonnen, :laura, I find three physical boxes in inventory named
> socorro-queuey[1-3].stage.webapp.phx1.mozilla.com that are marked as
> "building", was there still plans to use queuey?
Nope going with rabbitmq instead!
Flags: needinfo?(rhelmer)
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•