Closed
Bug 942342
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
SecReview: WebApps on Android - Synthetic APKs
Categories
(mozilla.org :: Security Assurance: Review Request, task)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 936725
People
(Reporter: mgoodwin, Assigned: mgoodwin)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [in-progress secreview] u= c= p=1 s=Sprint 5)
> 1) Who is/are the point of contact(s) for this review?
Myk Melez
> 2) Please provide a short description of the feature / application (e.g. problem solved, use cases, etc.):
> 3) Please provide links to additional information (e.g. feature page, wiki) if available and not yet included in feature description:
14:34 <bwalker> you can start with 888391: [Meta] Synthetic APKs
14:34 <bwalker> the current implementation work is happening in
14:34 <bwalker> 934756: implement synthetic APK install flow
14:34 <bwalker> 934758: implement synthetic APK launch flow 934760: implement synthetic APK update flow [See
dependency tree for bug 934760]
14:34 <bwalker> 934761: implement synthetic APK remove flow [See dependency tree for bug 934761]
> 4) Does this request block another bug? If so, please indicate the bug number
Bug 888391 I guess?
> 5) This review will be scheduled amongst other requested reviews. What is the urgency or needed completion date of this review?
This is planned for Fx29 as I understand it.
> 6) To help prioritize this work request, does this project support a goal specifically listed on this quarter's goal list? If so, which goal?
> 7) Please answer the following few questions: (Note: If you are asked to describe anything, 1-2 sentences shall suffice.)
> Does this feature or code change affect Firefox, Thunderbird or any product or service the Mozilla ships to end users?
Yes. Firefox for Android.
> Are there any portions of the project that interact with 3rd party services?
> Will your application/service collect user data? If so, please describe
> 8) If you feel something is missing here or you would like to provide other kind of feedback, feel free to do so here (no limits on size):
> 9) Desired Date of review (if known from https://mail.mozilla.com/home/ckoenig@mozilla.com/Security%20Review.html) and whom to invite.
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [pending secreview] → [pending secreview] u= c= p=1 s=sprint 4
changing s=ready (as that is the triage tag) and will note this is a candidate for sprint 4
Whiteboard: [pending secreview] u= c= p=1 s=sprint 4 → [pending secreview] u= c= p=1 s=ready
![]() |
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → mgoodwin
![]() |
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [pending secreview] u= c= p=1 s=ready → [pending secreview] u= c= p=1 s=sprint 4
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [pending secreview] u= c= p=1 s=sprint 4 → [in-progress secreview] u= c= p=1 s=sprint 4
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [in-progress secreview] u= c= p=1 s=sprint 4 → [in-progress secreview] u= c= p=1 s=ready
![]() |
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [in-progress secreview] u= c= p=1 s=ready → [in-progress secreview] u= c= p=1 s=Sprint 5
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•