Closed Bug 116027 Opened 23 years ago Closed 4 years ago

Handle <embed> and <object> with helpers if no plugin is available

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Plug-ins, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: bzbarsky, Assigned: peterlubczynski-bugs)

References

()

Details

(Whiteboard: [Hixie-P4][PL2:P5])

Attachments

(1 file)

6.18 KB, patch
peterlubczynski-bugs
: review-
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
BUILD: any STEPS TO REPRODUCE: 1) Configure a helper application for audio/wav 2) Make sure you have no plugins that handle audio/wav 3) Load a page that <embed>s a wav file (eg http://www.brainless.org) HOPED-FOR RESULTS: Browser uses the helper to display the content (since there is no prompt for a plugin in this case, presumably because no width/height are set on the <embed>) ACTUAL RESULTS: Nothing. No sound, no prompt to get the plugin, no indication that the <embed> is present. It seems to me that we should make the effort to use helper apps to display the embedded content in this case. Similarly, once the XBL plugin placeholder is in place, I feel that it should offer both an "install plugin" option and a "view with helper" option. See related bug 30733. This is distinct from that, since in my opinion there is no reason not to spawn the helpers externally (outside the Mozilla window).
Similarly, if we support a type natively (e.g. SVG) and we don't have a plugin, then we should render the SVG natively. See, e.g.: http://svgmagic.com/demos/chamelion/chamelion.html
Whiteboard: [Hixie-P4]
don't we already do <object> and <embed> correctly for image types (eg GIF) we support natively? The same should work for SVG...
i've heard that moz will render whatever natively-supported <object> types; as for <embed>, it's not yet supported in the same way, even when the <embed>-ed thing has a natively supported MIME type. For the specific case of SVG, this is a thorn in the side of folks who want to make "SVG-enabled" pages that will appear the same, to users of both Mozilla and of the Adobe SVG plugin; apparently, the Adobe SVG plugin uses the <embed> element, which moz does not yet support in the way that the original reporter of this feature-request (and myself, and probably others) would like. Some of the rationale for adding the feature: Mozilla supports inline SVG, and SVG via <object>, which is wonderful, but why should i or anyone else have to install the adobe plugin, just to get moz to render SVG which has been included via <embed> elements? It's not right. Mozilla has /native/ support for SVG, so it should use itself for rendering the 'src' of an <embed> element, when that 'src' has a natively-supported MIME type, e.g.: image/svg+xml, or audio/wav. Proposal: when mozilla encounters an <embed> element, with a 'type' that is natively-supported, then cause mozilla to attempt to "cast" that <embed> element as an <object>, and handle it equivalently.
Um... No. This bug is specifically on using _helpers_ if the browser has no internal means (built-in or plugins) to render content. Please file a separate bug (if one does not already exist, which I doubt) on our broken <embed> handling.
*** Bug 123158 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Attached patch patchSplinter Review
This patch fixes the problem in case of embedded plugins
I added the attachment #67888 [details] [diff] [review]: this patch fixes problem in case of embedded plugins. I think that similar code (as in nsObjectFrame.cpp) should be added to nsPluginViewer.cpp (in case of full page plugins).
The plug-ins triage team (av, beppe, peterl, serge and shrir) have reviewed this issue and have made the following determination: Setting to future, we will readdress this request at a later date
Priority: -- → P5
Whiteboard: [Hixie-P4] → [Hixie-P4][PL2:P5]
Target Milestone: --- → Future
Severity: enhancement → normal
Depends on: 188840
*** Bug 209096 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
That patch (attachment #67888 [details] [diff] [review]) seems to be for Linux. Does anyone have something for Windowz users? Groh.
Comment on attachment 67888 [details] [diff] [review] patch Wow. Way to ignore a contributed patch for a year or so... No wonder getting new developers is so hard. Peter, what do you think of this general approach? I don't really know much about the plugin end of this (see below for the helper apps end). Note that this patch is NOT Linux-only -- it will work on any platform on which nsIExternalHelperAppService::CanHandleContent is implemented in a reasonable way. At the moment, that function returns PR_FALSE on all platforms for all types, but that could be changed without too much trouble...
Attachment #67888 - Flags: review?(peterlubczynski)
Comment on attachment 67888 [details] [diff] [review] patch The approach looks fine but keep in mind that it will be subject to bug 157554. A preference or some placeholder UI would also be nice and this needs to be updated to the trunk. One alternate idea is to use a child frame frame as alternate content to load a xul document to do things like this or replace the default plugin.
Attachment #67888 - Flags: review?(peterlubczynski) → review-
-->default owner
Assignee: av → peterlubczynski
QA Contact: shrir → bmartin
Sergey, do you have time to work with Peter on this?
related: bug 240408
QA Contact: bmartin → plugins
csonne, I think we should probably do this as part of removing PFS.
Priority: P5 → P3
Target Milestone: Future → ---

We're no longer in the plugin business (apart from PDFs).

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: