Closed
Bug 13047
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
CSS-Visibility can´t be changed
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
INVALID
M17
People
(Reporter: maikmerten, Assigned: pierre)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [nsbeta2+] [new])
Attachments
(3 files)
Hello,
following HTML-Code should work; it doesn´t. I tested it
with Milestone 8 and 9 under Windows 95.
<html>
<head><title>CSS-Test</title></head>
<body>
<div style="position:absolute; top:20; left:40; visibility:hidden;" id="test">
Test
</div>
<script language="JavaScript">
<!--
div = document.getElementsByTagName("div");
div["test"].style.visibility = "visible";
//-->
</script>
</body>
</html>
If I leave out "visiblity:hidden;" I can freely switch the
visibility between "hidden" and "visible".
Sorry, but that´s all I know about that issue...
bye,
Maik Merten
Assignee: don → peterl
Component: Browser-General → Style System
Changing to style system. I'm deciding whether to resolve this as a duplicate
of bug 12194 or the other way around. I think this is the simpler test case...
Updated•25 years ago
|
Assignee: peterl → troy
Comment 3•25 years ago
|
||
Possible dupe of 10961?
I added code to SyncAndInvalidateView() and DidReflow() to make sure they do the
same thing as CreateViewForFrame() does.
That doesn't fix this bug, though. It looks to me like the styles are not
actually being changed.
I'm attaching a test case that tries to change the background-color of an
element during the onload handler, and that doesn't work either.
I don't know what this problem is, so I'm assigning this bug back to you
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
Using 12/2 build with Troy's test case, if color should change to yellow at
'body onload', it is not doing so. Reopening bug. If I am misunderstanding the
result, please resolve with explanation. Also, reassigning to Pierre.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Assignee: peterl → pierre
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Really reassigning to Pierre...
Assignee | ||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Whiteboard: [new]
Target Milestone: M14
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 24093 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Bug 23272 will be closed as dup. It contains an interesting testcase.
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 23272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 31299 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
Bug 32838 will be closed as dup. It contains an interesting testcase too.
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 32838 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16•25 years ago
|
||
Moving crufty m14-m15 bugs out to m16 for proper triage.
Target Milestone: M14 → M16
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 27367 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 18•25 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 35357 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•25 years ago
|
||
The testcase from Troy is wrong. The JS property should be backgroundColor, not
background-color.
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•25 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•25 years ago
|
||
The testcase from the reporter seems to work now...
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•25 years ago
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Target Milestone: M16 → M17
Comment 23•25 years ago
|
||
Adding nsbeta2 keyword since there are a lot of duplicates.
Keywords: nsbeta2
Comment 24•24 years ago
|
||
This should definitely be nsbeta2. Ability to hide/show elements from JS is
critical for creating web app UIs using DHTML.
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
So far, we have:
- Testcase from the reporter: WORKS NOW
- Testcase from Troy: INVALID
- Bug 12194: MISSING TESTCASE
- Bug 24093: WORKS NOW (the url changed; remove the "/design7")
- Bug 23272: INVALID (wrong browser-sniffing code; see the bug report)
We still need to check the other bugs closed as dups:
- Bug 31299
- Bug 32838
- Bug 27367
- Bug 35357
I sent a separate mail to David Baron asking him if he could retrieve the
testcase from bug 12194.
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•24 years ago
|
||
Bug 31299 was invalid too.
Three more bugs to go...
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•24 years ago
|
||
The last three bugs were invalid too. This bug can be closed as Invalid.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 30•24 years ago
|
||
Marking VERIFED INVALID on:
- MacOS9 2000-06-01-20-M16 Commercial Build
- Linux6 2000-06-01-20-M16 Commercial Build
- Win98 2000-06-01-21-M16 Commercial Build
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•