Closed Bug 1337166 Opened 4 years ago Closed 2 years ago
stylo: Make sure we don't unintentionally ship new CSS features when we ship stylo
See bug 1337068 comment 3. In general, Gecko's CSS engine is much more feature-complete than Servo's, but we have no reason to believe it's a strict super-set. We need to audit before shipping.
I don't think stylo still supports unprefixed :read-only and :read-write now.
No longer depends on: 312971
Adding dev-doc-needed keyword and ni'ing teoli (who works on CSS and DOM docs IIRC) to keep him informed. Is there or will these be a way to know the complete list of features stylo has implemented that Gecko didn't have?
As far as I was aware, there is very little stylo implements that Gecko didn't have at all. I've already been in discussion with engineering about differences between Gecko and Stylo, and we've started recording them like this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/57#Quantum_CSS_notes I'd like to be involved in the audit mentioned in this bug, so I can document any differences as necessary.
status-firefox57=wontfix unless someone thinks this bug should block 57
All the dependent bugs are closed Is there something else to do here?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.