Closed Bug 152147 Opened 22 years ago Closed 17 years ago
Ability to save session state
8.99 KB, text/plain
26.00 KB, image/png
4.48 KB, patch
|Details | Diff | Splinter Review|
4.47 KB, patch
|Details | Diff | Splinter Review|
19.31 KB, patch
|Details | Diff | Splinter Review|
Galeon and Opera can save the session state when the browser quits so that on the next launch windows are created at the same positions and the same URLs are loaded. It would be nice to have this in Chimera as well. Saving the session is useful if you have to log out and have a lot of windows open or if you want to update to a newer build. Also, if the session state is saved each time a new page is loaded, the feature could serve as a crash recovery method, too.
This seems like a valid RFE for Mozilla in general, and not just Chimera. Anyone know of a similar RFE already in place for Mozilla?
Perhaps this can be a pref? Adding [RFE] to Summary line.
Summary: Ability to save session state → [RFE] Ability to save session state
The Mozilla-wide RFE is bug 36810. But this RFE doesn't need to depend on that one.
May I suggest to add this to Bookmarks rather than a special save as. So it'll be done by add bookmark as now, just add an additional checkbox [x] All Windows with all their tabs In the Bookmarks there is what can be called: - Saved as One Window - Saved as One Window with its tabs via checkmark option Adding - Saved as All Windows with All their tabs I don't think that for All Windows, the checkmark to save their tabs should be enabled, that would become quite difficult to handle/ask which one should and which one should not save its tabs. See also http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156886 to have different icons for each type of bookmark.
I don't think this should be imbued into the bookmark system. Bookmarks don't (and shouldn't) contain info like browser windows' initial positions and so forth. Having a lot of bookmark-related options would also cause confusion for the user. A session auto-save that gets triggered when Chimera quits would be nicer. You could just quit the browser (or logout or shutdown)and go away, and upon returning you could just pick up where you left off with your browsing. That includes open tabs and open windows. This is quite similar to what Apple is doing with the latest version of Mail. If you quit the Mail.app in Jaguar (OS 10.2) while compose windows are open, on the next launch the windows re-appear and you can just continue working with them. This sort of behavior is NeXTish, and it's what Apple is aiming for with a number of changes in the Mac GUI. The Dock, for instance, mixes open apps with closed apps --the state shouldn't matter, an app should just give you what you want when you invoke it.
I agree with Lauri that this shouldn't be handled in the bookmarks system. (However, Galeon offers to create bookmarks from the previous session when starting after a crash, which is a nice feature.) In order to avoid reinventing the wheel, I suggest using Galeon's session format. Besides, at some point someone is going to share OS X and Linux home directories over NFS and is going to want to share Galeon and Chimera sessions. Galeon saves the session in a file called session_saved.xml. The file format is XML-based and doesn't use namespaces (so it can be parsed with Core Foundation's XML parser which might be easier to use than expat when the surrounding code is in Objective-C). The root element is <session>. It contains <window> elements as children. The <window> elements are ordered from back to front. The <window> element has four attributes: x, y, width and height for indicating the location of the top left corner of the window and the size of the window. Each <window> element has one or more <embed> elements as children describing the tabs. The <embed> element has two attributes: title and URL. (Title allow the page title to be restored before the page has been refetched.)
I'm trying to implement a simple parser driver for use with the Galeon-style format and Core Foundation's parser.
Problems: * The code is standalone--not integrated with Chimera * Apple's XML parser doesn't replace NCR and predefined entities with proper chars.
Summary: [RFE] Ability to save session state → Ability to save session state
If you only need one session state to be saved, the last one, this can be implemented in the "File-Open Recent >" menu, see Bug 179673 The sub-menu will be: Last Session State - Last10Closed It's too bad to just be able to save only one. Enhancing the bookmark saving by adding ~"Memorize Windows Layout" is simpler to understand than creating another new system. Now only Tabs can be saved in bookmarks, people browsing with several windows opened (and arranged on screen) don't have any equivalent.
Right now, I see this as being implemented in a fashion that wouldn't actually save the browsers state until the user wants to quit. If a feature such as session state saving was constantly updated, and a keypress-toggle was added to the Chimera startup routine, this could help track some of the pesky tabbed browsing bugs. My idea is that when Chimera crashes, it could look for a pref to auto-load a saved state, and if it goes into a crashing loop, a keycombo at Chimera's startup could force ignore the pref. I started Bug 181646 in an effort to request such a feature, and I'm not sure if that's a dupe, or if it's different enough to warrant a separate report. Ideas?
Status: the current scroll positions of the page(s) Tabs: all the tabs in of the window(s) Windows: all the opened windows All Tabs and All Windows being disabled according to the situation.
The wording of the options in the mockup is ambiguous and non-descriptive. Bad, bad, bad. And as has been stated before, the bookmarks system must not be imbued with magical powers. It has to remain simple and as similar to that of other browsers as possible. The most natural way to save the session state is to remember the number of open windows and tabs and the locations of the sites that were open when the browser was quit, and reload those sites into their respective tabs and windows upon launch. In other words, the session should be saved upon quit and restored upon launch. Nothing more, nothing less. This should be done automatically, without user input at any point. This is what Mail.app does and is what Chimera should do.
Lauri, I don't want to argue here. Find better words, I'm from Belgium. The 'All Windows' is just to be 'fair' with those who don't use tabbed browsing and would like to be able to open several windows without having to resize, position everything each time. The Status (scroll) is not so important but would be great. Your argument is not correct, bookmarks in Chimera have already introduce an extended way, tabbed browsing. What about those who need several arranged windows?
> Your argument is not correct, bookmarks in Chimera have already introduce an > extended way, tabbed browsing. No -- Chimera was not the one that introduced tabbed browsing and the bookmarking solutions that come with it, so that's out of context. Mozilla, Opera and a few others came before Chimera on this front. > What about those who need several arranged windows? I'll take the Mail.app example again. Like Mail, Chimera should remember window positions. If you open a bunch of windows in Mail, quit, and reopen, the windows remember their positions, contents and scroll states. Chimera should work similarly.
Lauri, you are illogic. >Simple bookmark Then the other browsers should not had to introduce multi-tabs savings ? Multi-windows savings is an idea as great as multi-tabs saving. Chimera will then be the first to introduce multi-windows savings. The others will follow. If they have not started already, by spying bugzilla. Or should we wait to see new concepts elsewhere to accept them for Chimera ? Lead or follow. >Mail That's just one session, the last one! Do you only have one multi-tabs bookmark ? No, why then should we only have one multi-windows saving ? Sorry to the devs about my 'arguing' it's my last one.
This RFE isn't about bookmarking. Bookmarks are things that users specifically requests to be created and it would be inapproprate to delete bookmarks automatically. This RFE is about remembering the session state when the app is quit and relauched. It would be inappropriate to store this data in the bookmarks file, because it would either generate a large number of bookmarks that the user hasn't specifically requested or alternatively the app would have to automatically remove the old session bookmarks. Neither polluting the bookmarks with lots of automatically generated bookmarks nor removing bookmarks automatically is appropriate, because bookmarks are considered to be a user-managed collection of data. Ideally, session saving could be extended to work in the background so that it could be used as a crash recovery mechanism as well (as in Galeon). In general it is a bad idea to use a single file both for short-term automatic storage and long-term user-managed storage--especially when losing the long-term storage would be especially bad for the user. People don't want to lose their bookmarks. Doing frequent writes in case of a crash increases the likelyhood that sometimes the crash happens during the write. This could be cured by rotating two files, but there can be a lot of bookmarks so keeping rewriting all that data to the disk frequently when the real bookmarks (bookmarks that are considered bookmarks by the user) don't change doesn't make sense. FWIW, Galeon allows explicit session saving in addition to the automatic session saving and the storage and the UI are separate from the bookmark system.
Sorry, I'm new to this system, but I implemented something very much like this. It auto-saves state to disk every time locationChanged: gets called to a browserWrapper, and then auto-loads that on startup. http://www.osxtreme.net/software/Chimera_Custom/ You can try it out, prebuilt Navigator.app is there, as well as the source. I sent feedback to email@example.com, but just got a generic "thanks for your input" response. *shrug* :)
I was pondering how to avoid a crash-on-auto-load loop for a non-advanced (read: doesn't want to edit prefs by hand to disable auto-load or edit the autosaved windows file) user, and came up with some logic that might work: -touch file cleanshutdown on succesful/clean browser shutdown -if cleanshutdown not present on startup -present the list of windows that were autosaved "Chimera detected an improper shutdown. Remove windows you think will cause a crash, and click OK to proceed or Cancel to abort loading any of them." -allow user to remove (uncheck) some/all via an internal or external plist-like editor -possible to proceed with cancel or ok (up to user pref) after a timer expires? -if present, delete cleanshutdown ASAP in case we crash -open the remaining windows to autoload Dunno if the timer is possible or makes sense, and dunno where I'd get a suitable editor for presenting the Autosaved Window Array (imagining something that looked like OmniOutliner, for instance)
Henri comment 16 : there is no pollution of auto-saved bookmarks. Only one is automatically saved, only one is visible in the menu, the "File-Open Recents > Last Session". See comment 9. Internally, the devs can make severals in a cycle and try to go back to the last valid one.
This patch is to the source. Binary files, and a copy of this patch, will be in the next attachement.
This has: The same .patch file as above, an additional oldpaths.patch for anyone who happened to be using my old Custom application (which wrote files to the wrong place, sorry!), a mainmenu.tgz with three additions to the Window menu in the .nib file, and, as usual, a .txt file describing the features and how to install the whole deal. This implements both a manual save and load window state (which are in the Window menu and hotkeyed as control-cmd-S control-cmd-O), as well as automatic saving of state and automatic loading of that state on startup. auto-save and auto-load are currently separate options, but could be made a single option if simplicity is desired over separability. If you would like a preference pane to test these with, also get my customprefpane from: http://www.osxtreme.net/software/Chimera_Custom/patches/
I've had several good responses on my patch via email. I'm not sure why a good crash-recovery feature isn't a priority for a developing browser, but if there's anything else I can do for this, let me know.
i'm not really a big fan, but i'll keep this around to follow the discussion.
Assignee: saari → pinkerton
Pinkerton: Is there something specific about Michael Scheel's code that needs to be addressed? Why can't it get in?
Why isn't this being pursued? I've spoken to several mac people who have commented about a feature like this, and now Omniweb has. But it's been sitting here for a year gathering dust. Unfortunately I've been unable to get this patch applied since there've been so many code changes since. But this would be a great feature, to leverage against other browsers.
I know this is a bug for Camino but since "Mozilla in general" was mentioned I thought I'd add that there is a plugin for firefox that does this pretty well: http://www.extensionsmirror.nl/index.php?showtopic=166 Someone by the alias Pike first wrote it, it was rewriten and enhanced by someone going by the alias Rue, and then extended (added buttons & shortcuts) by Rowne-Wuff Mastaile. Some features: Remembers all open windows and all tabs Remembers window-chrome settings (toolbars, etc.) Remembers window position / size Remembers every tab's scroll-state Remembers every tab's history scroll-states (in dev.) Stores only 1 pref-string per window Writes prefs to disk for every tab/window open + close Captures complete session-state on shutdown-request Writes flag on shutdown-request / Crash-recovers prior session if flag wasn't written
But of course! Look at: 63094 (In reply to comment #1) > This seems like a valid RFE for Mozilla in general, and not just Chimera. Anyone > know of a similar RFE already in place for Mozilla?
*** Bug 181646 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 300314 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Bump. Comment 25 seems to have gone as yet unanswered, but this is clearly something folks want, as evidenced by the dupes it's generating. I can probably bring Scheel's code up to currency, but I'd like to know I'm not wasting my time. cl
It's veru wise to have a chat about this. Last I heard was that the main reason it never went in or had a serious look at was because it was developed in a time where such features where not a priority at all. I agree that from the look of user responce this is something plenty of people want. But as with all features in Camino it should be as transparant and simple as possible, please not something like what Omni has.
I don't think we need anything as complex as Omniweb, especially as Camino can save a tab group. Restoration of tabs after relaunch (or crash) however would be superb.
Yeah, I'd be more than happy with just a completely transparent auto-save that would allow for recovery from crashes. The rest of the stuff is icing on the cake, but I agree with Jasper that this should be as transparent and as simple as possible. If we don't bother implementing the user-activated session state saving, we should just destroy the file with the saved state in it on a successful quit so we don't clutter up the profile folder any more than we have to. cl
The patch as Stephane Moureau isn't bad at all. Basically he created two Window menu options "Save Window State" and "Open Saved Windows state" I think that an invisible autosave when tabs/windows are created and pages are loaded would be the best way to do a session save/restore. Note that we have the same kind of approach for downloads right now. We neeed to be carefull to not impact pageloading, meaning the session save should be an incremental background process. I'm sure this could be done fast. Looking at Stephanes patch I think the concept of doing a (one) manual save is very interesting. Don't get me wrong, the feature as OmniWeb has it is a great innovation, and of great use in some situations. But I think that Camino's approach to most features is to make sure that it's functional from the start. So maybe it's interesting to do the following. "Auto save session" saves the session inivisbly, and restores after a crash or whatever. "Restore session" Restores to the last save state, this could apply to having closed a window with tabs. "Save/Restore custom session" I'm not sure we want this, but let's talk it over. Finally I think this feature should somehow get some integration with Bug 196359. All in the name of making sure people can restore and go back to "lost" pages.
This discussion reminds me of what John Siracusa wrote at arstechnica a little while ago in his journal. Why not make Camino act more like NetNewsWire in regard to when you quit with open tabs/windows, on re-launch, that state is preserved. Maybe that's what is being looked at, but it's not clear from the discussion. As a follow-on to that, if Camino could synchronize of state across computers like NNW does, that could be a killer feature (like Siracusa points out). The synching could be very transparent to the user--an advanced feature, but one that may prove addicting.
Pink, Simon...any comments on whether we'd like to try to get this into 1.1? There seems to be ample demand for it. cl
Hm, that's a pretty messy patch that needs a lot of cleanup, but the approach seems reasonable. However, I wonder if we could tack this information into the bookmarks plist (which gets saved pretty frequently).
I guess we could save it in the bookmark.plist but wouldn't that cause all kinds of issues with 3d party apps that import our bookmarks? Especially since not many of them have a clue about what it is? Or are you thinking of a special category with it own icon in the left column containing folders (session/windows) and bookmark and tabgroups for the saving of the session? But wouldn't we then also have to save window locations and suchs?
You're right; a separate file would be best.
What about using the history to save the information. Simply mark unclosed tabs until they are closed - if camino quits or crashes the history has to be searched for unclosed entries. I don't know whether this could be done efficiently or if there are other problems involved but it sounds like a good idea to me :-).
Using history would be unefficient; you'd have to look through the possibly hundreds of thousands of history entries on launch, looking for the "open" urls.
Having a feature like this would likely encourage more people to download and test unstable builds as they won't have to worry about loosing data.
can you guys piggy back off the firefox sessionsaver plugin? It does this, plus adds syncing across computers. Not really UI dependent, either.
*** Bug 329218 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Just like to chime in one my desire for this. It certainly doesn't sound too hard to implement. Just reading the comments it seems a holdup is where to save the session info. I don't see what the problem is there. I don't expect anything to be added to my bookmarks unless I add it specifically. Just save the session info in Application support as a new/seperate html file. It's certainly a very, very useful feature. I don't understand why it hasn't been integrated already. Thanks, Adam
Taking. I'm gonna see what I can do about bringing the existing patch up to speed. I'd personally really like this for 1.1. cl
Assignee: mikepinkerton → bugzilla
Targeting for 1.1. I now have Scheel's code building without errors or warnings, although there's quite a bit of cleanup that needs to happen. I'm dedicating tomorrow to getting this up and running. cl
Target Milestone: Future → Camino1.1
Status update: I have a functional patch. There are a lot of little gremlins that need to be chased down, though, but nothing that impairs functionality. Lots of performance stuff, that kind of thing. cl
This patch brings Scheel's code up to date in the current tree. It's functional, but it's by no means perfect. I've made some notes in the process of bringing it up to speed, presented here roughly in order of importance: 1) We should probably save window sizes and positions. This will likely require the use of an NSDictionary, which I know little about, but I'll look into it if folks agree this should be done. 2) We do not currently know anything about previous crashes that may have happened. We need some means of avoiding a crash loop when autoload is on. Right now, all we do is default autoload to false, which helps a little. ;) 3) We currently save all tabs, regardless of content. We might want to think about not saving blank tabs, other about: URLs, view-source: URLs, etc. 4) The methods that do most of the heavy lifting don't really seem like they belong on PreferenceManager, but I don't have a better suggestion at the moment. 5) We should avoid watching for state changes while we're loading a previously saved session (either autoload or manually). 6) We should consider throwing an error in the following circumstances: a) no saved session found when user tries to load (alternatively, and probably better, we should disable the UI for loading a saved session in this case) b) trying to auto-load and failing c) trying to load (auto or manual) when offline. I've already told MainController not to auto-load when offline. 7) The UI needs some serious thought and discussion, particularly how we'll handle the preference toggling. 8) The |maybeAutosaveWindowStateFile| method has the potential to be a performance issue unless we give it some serious optimisation. Caching/saving the profile path and autosave pref value would be a really good idea here, I think. I'd like input from Mike, Simon, Stuart, Mark, and the original patch contributor, if possible. cl
Attachment #110642 - Attachment is obsolete: true
(In reply to comment #49) > 7) The UI needs some serious thought and discussion, particularly how we'll > handle the preference toggling. There are much more fundamental UI issues. This saves state in terms of URLs, and the model of URL===state is becoming less and less accurate. - Will users understand that form data won't saved? - Will users understand that AJAX-y/DHTML pages will likely be completely different on startup? - Will users understand that sites that have a session identifier might just load up as a "Your session expired" page, or on the front page of the site? Users have a hard enough time with this as it relates to bookmarks, and I suspect it will be even less apparent that something that is supposed to save their session won't "just work" the way other OS X apps that save and restore state do.
The concerns raised by Stuart should indeed be used to "teach" our users what to expect. That is why I already advised to turn of auto restore, perhaps we should show either a sheet or a window that explaines our users what to expect. UI wise I will try and make some mockups if needed to see what thing would look like and work, please let me know.
I'm not sure what comments you'd like from me, other than I'm very happy someone is 1) working on this and 2) making use of work I did. I'm interested in the overall user experience, and in particular, the crash-recovery aspects of this feature. I understand that it needs a lot of UI help to make it as intuitive as the rest of Camino, and I don't know what to offer, other than I think it is worth it. Thanks.
One of the things that our friends over at the incendiary mammal are looking at is better use of cache (http://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox2/Features), so that might help here, though not in the crash variant, unless they fix the crashes-discard-cache issue. You also might want to chat with autonome next time you catch him on irc to see what else they might have up their sleeves that might benefit us here.
Just throwing in my 2 cents: Regarding the comment re:saved state = saved URLs... I feel that this still holds true, and most users would understand this on some level. The Firefox session saver works the same, and it's unreasonable to expect we could ever return everything back the way it was, simply due to possible login timeouts etc. I feel it's really the AJAX/DHTML designers responsability to make sure all the data is kept current. Really this is already the case... If I'm editing my wordpress site and I haven't finished and I try to close the window I get a prompt about losing my data. If we are restoring a state after quit then this case will have to have been accounted for (user will be prompted on quit) if the state is being restored after a crash, well... it's unreasonable to expect a crash to have no consequences.
(In reply to comment #54) > it's unreasonable to expect we could ever return everything back the way > it was, simply due to possible login timeouts etc. Users have unreasonable expectations all the time. My point is that the UI needs to be handled carefully to help prevent users from comparing Camino's session saving to the session saving that a variety of other OS X programs do and coming to the conclusion that Camino's is broken.
Comment on attachment 215530 [details] [diff] [review] brings Michael Scheel's code up-to-date Two issues with this patch so far: it doesn't actually write out a saved_windows_auto_last.plist file, so it's not really even saving state yet, and when you enable autorestore, Camino creates no window and it is impossible to create a window manually, so the code for handling "failures" in restoring needs to be much more robust (partially 6b).
*** Bug 336631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to comment #57) > *** Bug 336631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Sorry about the dupe folks. Question: How to implement the patches above? Save the script or compile it and store it in the Camino folders somewhere? I myself will not use a browser that does not save my last locations as I need to swap users and reboot to Boot Camp often. Safari does it with Saft, Firefox does it with an add-on, IE does it with Avant Browser, etc. Thanks for any help, Manny
You patch Camino and rebuild it. Bugzilla isn't the place to get help with making custom Camino builds though; try irc or the forums.
Now that we have http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Session_store_API http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/nsISessionStore in the codebase, do we want to continue working on our own implementation of this, or do we want to use the Mozilla APIs instead? I can see some advantages either way. Pink, Mento, Simon, Stuart? cl
(In reply to comment #60) > Now that we have > > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Session_store_API > http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/nsISessionStore "nsISessionStore is defined in browser/components/sessionstore/nsISessionStore.idl" That doesn't sound like a Mozilla API at all; that sounds like a Firefox-only API.
Taking. In order to make reviewing easier and faster for everyone, I'm going to do this in a series of smaller patches. This is the first step, which creates a class to handle saving and restoring sessions and a (hidden at this point) pref to enable it. At this point, it will only save on quit, meaning it's not a crash recovery mechanism. Once this is in, I'll file bugs for the rest, including periodic auto-saving, safe crash recovery, and a GUI pref.
User's point of view: As has been pointed out Firefox 2.0 already has some sort of session save. It's only apparent if the application unexpectedly quits though. It doesn't have any options visible to the user. If it saved state on a standard quit command (Apple Event) it would be perfect.
(In reply to comment #63) > User's point of view: > As has been pointed out Firefox 2.0 already has some sort of session save. It's > only apparent if the application unexpectedly quits though. It doesn't have any > options visible to the user. > If it saved state on a standard quit command (Apple Event) it would be perfect. > Yes it does; in the Main section of Firefox's preferences I can choose "Show my windows and tabs from last time" for When Firefox starts:
Please don't discuss anything outside the scope of what I described in comment 62--the actual mechanism for persisting window state--in this bug. Anything else, including UI and preferences on save and restore behavior, should be discussed in the follow-up bugs once they are filed.
There's a bit of wonkiness with stack order on the branch on occasion; we think it might be a Gecko focus-stealing bug that was fixed on the trunk.
QA Contact: winnie → general
This looks like a good start. Do you only want to restore state when launched directly? What if Camino gets launched via a GetURL event? Do we restore state (in addition to loading the requested URL)? Can the user manually load that last state ever?
(In reply to comment #68) > Do you only want to restore state when launched directly? What if Camino gets > launched via a GetURL event? Do we restore state (in addition to loading the > requested URL)? That's the idea, and I've tested using the Open URL service; the state will be restored, then the window opened by the service handler will be pulled to the front. Similarly with files given on the command line and the one-time-per-release Camino welcome page. > Can the user manually load that last state ever? My conception of what we want is something with no user interaction beyond checking a box in the prefs, but if that's not the final goal we can certainly add UI to restore manually in a later bug.
Agreed. When launching Camino by clicking a link in another app, the last session should first be restored and then the clicked link loaded in a new window or tab. Doing anything else could lead to data loss.
Stuart, did you look at Firefox's state saving code? I'm wondering if rolling our own is a good idea, since some aspects of state (e.g. scroll position, form field contents etc) may be hard to save and restore from app-level code).
I still need to look into that and see if we can make a "what I was looking at" restore instead of a "what pages I had open" restore; that would certainly be ideal. But pretty much everything this patch saves is our chrome information, which Gecko has no knowledge of, so we'll need a way to store it anyway.
Can the code in the (open-source) CaminoSession plugin [http://willmore.eu/plugins/caminosession.html] be used? It's a good working implementation, IMHO, that would be great to merge into the browser.
Using other portions of that code has since been proposed by the author, and is now being discussed in a follow-up bug. In terms of what it relevant for discussion here (see comment 65), what I have posted is a working implementation of save/restore; if there are specific portions of the the CaminoSession implementation of the actual save/restore mechanism that you feel are better than what I have posted, feel free to point them out and they can be integrated. There's little value in discarding my implementation out of hand and starting over with the CaminoSession implementation (which, based on having looked briefly at that section of the CaminoSession code posted in the other bug, does not appear to handle some portions of the restoration process as well as this version).
I've looked into the FF stuff a bit more. I'm still not entirely sure whether we can use it or not, but the way it works is just by dumping the entire window to JSON string and then restoring it from that later. If there is a way for us to call into it at the right granularity, we can just take that string and stuff it into the dictionary, so I'm still pretty confident that this is the right approach, and that adding it later would be no harder than adding it now.
(In reply to comment #67) > There's a bit of wonkiness with stack order on the branch on occasion; we think > it might be a Gecko focus-stealing bug that was fixed on the trunk. I was able to reproduce this wonkiness manually this morning when loading my bugzilla tab group and opening a new window to do other stuff while it loaded, so it's somebody's bug but not really related to this at all. I filed bug 359429 on it.
*** Bug 359627 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Attachment #243928 - Flags: review? → review?(joshmoz)
Attachment #243928 - Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton)
So you don't have to say it: I'll add comments for the new class and its methods.
Comment on attachment 243928 [details] [diff] [review] phase one +static SessionManager* gSharedSessionManager = nil; rather than a global, you can make this a static var local to the sharedInstance method. so this doesn't help at all with crashes, only when you quit. is that another bug or never the intent? sr=pink
Attachment #243928 - Flags: superreview?(mikepinkerton) → superreview+
(In reply to comment #80) > so this doesn't help at all with crashes, only when you quit. is that another > bug or never the intent? Another bug.
As checked in on trunk and MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH
Attachment #243928 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Bug 358689 and bug 360839 are the follow-ups
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.