Here we go again...
This is a long ways off...
Adding dependency on XForms
alias for faster searching
adding dependency on XML Events
Sjoerd Visscher ( firstname.lastname@example.org ) has a XBL based prototype of parts of
the XHTML 2.0 Draft at http://w3future.com/weblog/gems/xhtml2.xml
I don't see any information regarding which license the code is under, but it
would not hurt to contact him and check it out -- I will let you guys know what
You can use my XBL files if you want. But I'm pretty sure it's not the way to
implement xhtml 2.0 in Mozilla. It's too slow to convert each node to it's xhtml
http://w3future.com/weblog/gems/xhtml2.xsl ) and it is more flexible than XBL.
I'd be extremely happy if Composer only wrote XHTML2. It seems like it would be
easier than HTML4 on front and back end.
re #6, I looked at at both the xslt and the xbl implementation.
First of all, let's rule out xslt. It's very unlikely fast, for one. But more
importantly, it changes the displayed document, which makes it impossible
to use js on the original document.
About the performance drag for the xbl version, the attribute foo is probably
really simple and doens't require js, as long as it isn't requiring any
translation of the values.
http://www.xulplanet.com/tutorials/xultu/xblatin.html talks attribute
calls it forwarding, of course ;-)
Adding something like Attribute Value Templates (see
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt.html#dt-attribute-value-template) to XBL sounds like
a bad idea on a second thought, as more complex algorithms in the evaluation
cause trouble to keep stuff synched in dxhtml2. (Yeah, fancy acronym.)
I don't know if this is required by a xhtml2 implementation, though.
Stuff like the object tag, unifying two html tags is probably a bit more
Sjoerd, maybe you could add a relicensed version of the mozilla part of your
stuff to this bug?
*** Bug 186985 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Created attachment 112513 [details]
New XHTML 2.0 tags in res\html.css
I modify the html.css. I add XHTML 2.0 selectors.
From the xhtml 2 spec of the quote element:
"Visual user agents must not add delimiting quotation marks"
So you should remove this part:
Created attachment 112536 [details]
New XHTML 2.0 tags in res\html.css ver 0.2
I remove content from quote.
That patch uses the wrong namespace for XHTML2.
In any case we must not implement this until XHTML2 is in CR.
Namespace in patch is form 3.1.1. Strictly Conforming Documents -
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xhtml2-20021218/xhtml2.html What's wrong with it?
Mozilla should see the most popular formats like: mpeg, avi, mov (video), mp3,
wav, midi, aiff (sound) not only amimation like gif or mng and images like jpeg,
gif or png. Because in XHTML 2.0 there are not <img>, there are <object>. So
XHTML support not only images (or animations) but also video and sound.
adding [meta] and setting component to Tracking
Why was bug 162479 removed from the dependancies?
Because XFrames has nothing to do with XHTML 2.0. It is a standalone XML
language (some published articles get this wrong).
Diff: (changed in green, new in yellow)
Almost a year after the previous update, the 7th draft was published in May 2005:
Diff-marked version compared to 20040722 here:
8th draft :
Diff compared to 2005 05 27 :
Guess this is a WONTFIX now then?
yeah the w3 will be stopping it. I'm not too fond of this xhtml 5 business though :(
> I'm not too fond of this xhtml 5 business
I'm sure you mean HTML 5. It seems you really got attached to XHTML ;-)
no xhtml 5, the html5 talks a bit about XHTML
XHTML2 is not going to happen.